Calls by animal welfare groups have intensified over the past month for Wanpi World Safari Zoo in Tainan to reconsider its plan to import 18 giraffes, among other animals, from Eswatini.
The largest private zoo in southern Taiwan has long been scrutinized by the groups regarding its treatment of animals — four of the five giraffes obtained by the zoo have died in the past 10 years due to disease or accidents.
More concerns were raised last week over the nation’s image and role in global wildlife conservation, as the International Union for Conservation of Nature had in 2016 listed giraffes as “vulnerable” after their population dropped significantly over the past few decades. The reticulated giraffe, the subspecies the zoo plans to import, has been listed as endangered since 2018.
That year, a seven-year-old male giraffe named Xiaoshun suddenly collapsed and died in front of visitors at Wanpi World. An autopsy found that it had choked to death, which experts considered a rare cause of death for the animal.
Wanpi World was not the only institution to have trouble with giraffes during that period — Taipei Zoo also saw a number of fatalities, including Xiaoshun’s brother Xiaojiu, which died due to stress while being transported to another location in 2016.
Xiaoshun’s death sparked calls to review and reconsider the role and functions of zoos in Taiwan, as well as their ability to care for giraffes.
However, Wanpi World imported two more giraffes less than a year later to appease the “disappointed children” visiting the zoo. The new arrivals were touted as an opportunity for younger visitors to learn about the protection of animals — but with no improvements made, one of them died in an accident in March, while the other lost its tail in an unexplained incident.
Wanpi World has acknowledged its shortcomings and said it hired a new team to run the zoo last year under the spirit of “protecting animals.” A presentation last month showed upgrades and new educational programs toward that goal.
However, the bottom line is that Wanpi World’s managers have a business to run, and their decision to import so many animals at once, despite having had so much trouble with only a handful, seems hasty and contradicts the zoo’s self-proclaimed principles.
At the very least, the new team should demonstrate to the public and animal welfare groups that the zoo has really changed its ways before making such a large purchase.
The zoo already has plenty of animals to care for, and if their living conditions are poor, it should focus on the welfare of its current residents first. Otherwise, it would be perpetuating the idea that animals are merely replaceable commodities to entertain humans, and that nothing has really changed at the zoo.
Questions also need to be raised regarding the import permit application process: Have the authorities made sure that the transaction follows international covenants on the trade of endangered species? Have they checked how Eswatini got hold of the giraffes? What is Eswatini’s purpose behind breeding them, as the subspecies is not endemic to that country?
The authorities have said everything was done by the book. However, many questions remain unanswered, which necessitates putting the purchase on hold for further inspection. If the purchase does go through, the zoo needs to be closely monitored to make sure it lives up to its promises.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has