Decades ago, when I worked as a ranger in Alaska’s Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, each cruise ship that entered the bay carried hundreds of passengers. Today, they carry thousands. They do not look like ships anymore. They look like the boxes the ships came in, huge floating milk cartons, ponderous and white, but once they get moving, they are a force. One that occasionally strikes whales.
In July 2001, the carcass of a humpback whale known as Snow due to the white markings on her fluke was found floating in the bay. An investigation concluded she had died of massive trauma to her skull and cervical vertebrae, consistent with a vessel collision.
Princess Cruise Lines, purchased by Carnival in 2003, eventually pleaded guilty to failing to operate its vessel, the Dawn Princess, at a slow and safe speed while near humpback whales, contravening the US’ Marine Mammal Protection Act and Endangered Species Act. Passengers and crew had spotted humpbacks near the ship, but the ship did not change course or speed.
Illustration: Constance Chou
Pursuant to a plea agreement, Princess was sentenced to pay a US$200,000 fine, plus US$550,000 to the National Park Foundation for “community service.”
Since then, the ships have increased in size.
Before COVID-19, Dream Cruises announced that it was building a ship that would carry nearly 10,000 passengers and have the first cruise ship theme park, with the longest roller coaster at sea. Many ships are already three times the volume they were back in my ranger days — so large they are cities at sea, floating condominiums with hospitality staff always eager to sell you a shore excursion at the next port of call.
The Majestic Princess, due in Alaska late this month, has 19 decks.
Imagine: All that time on the water but never close to it.
For several years, Alaska’s bejeweled Inside Passage, crowned by Glacier Bay, has been ranked one of the most popular cruising destinations in the world. After a 21-month absence — including the quiet COVID-19 pandemic summer last year, when the bay’s whales appeared to prosper — a few big ships are headed back north. By next year, things could be booming again, with thousands of passengers flooding the streets of Ketchikan, Juneau and Skagway every summer day, pouring in and out of gift shops and jewelry stores.
Some locals would welcome the revenue while others would bemoan the crowds and noise, and ask: Is this how it is going to be? Business as usual? Growth forever? Alaska-based pilots who board these enormous ships express concern that strong on-beam winds could make them unsafe in tight navigational areas.
If anything should change after COVID-19 and not go back to normal, it is cruise ships and the voracious industry that operates them. It is an industry that co-opts communities, buys up entire waterfronts, if not private islands such as in the Bahamas and Caribbean, and takes a hefty percentage of every shore excursion it sells.
In Glacier Bay, the US National Park Service (NPS) requires that ships suspend all competing activities, such as casinos, so that passengers can partake of ranger-led activities that focus on education and inspiration.
The NPS also charges a per passenger fee, which makes the park one of the most solvent — and potentially compromised — in the NPS system. The park’s budget now depends heavily on cruise ship money that funds research, salaries and in-park development.
While only two ships are allowed in the park each day, there is no limit on their size. Some would call this “industry capture,” wherein a regulatory authority becomes beholden to an industry it is supposed to regulate.
After the Holland America ship Westerdam accidentally discharged 22,500 gallons (85,172 liters) of gray water into Glacier Bay in 2018, the state of Alaska fined the company US$17,000. The NPS fined it US$250.
Ocean Conservancy said that gray water discharges “can lead to oxygen depletion, spread pathogenic bacteria and viruses, and increase nutrient levels in the surrounding ecosystem. Higher nutrient levels can lead to toxic blooms and dead zones that can cause harmful disturbances throughout food chains.”
Holland America, like Princess, is a subsidiary of Carnival. Glacier Bay, on the other hand, is not only a national park and preserve, but also a UN biosphere reserve and world heritage site. Very few places can boast such international recognition. Those that do deserve stringent protection and the utmost respect. That is why things must change.
Few of today’s big ships are registered in the US, which largely exempts them from federal taxes. If they are going to operate there, take up pier space, burn vast amounts of fossil fuel and dump their waste in sanctified areas and other near-shore waters, they should be required to register in the US, buy carbon offsets, go as green as possible, pay federal taxes, obey the laws and high safety standards and, when in contravention, pay steep fines or forfeit their right to sail into places such as Glacier Bay — forever.
It is time for the federal government to limit the size of ships allowed in US waters. Make them carry more responsibility, not more passengers. For those already too big, buy them and convert them into dockside homeless shelters, veterans’ care facilities and marine research laboratories.
Those still in service should be incentivized to focus more on education and less on entertainment. They should employ historians, scientists, naturalists and indigenous people whose ancient homelands the ships sail through.
Am I anti-cruise ship? No. I am anti-excess, pro-moderation.
I have fond memories of my ranger days in Glacier Bay, telling stories and sharing information. Due to the ships, thousands of people can visit Glacier Bay without setting foot on land. They can have profound experiences.
“It’s so big and beautiful,” a woman said as we stood together at the ship’s rail, her eyes drinking up a majestic blue wall of ice — a tidewater glacier — only 400m away.
“Thank God for our public lands,” she added.
Later, a man said to me: “Say, ranger, these mountains you got here ... they worth anything?”
“They give life to the glaciers that sculpt this bay,” I said. “They’re also important to the indigenous Tlingit, whose heritage is born of this place.”
“No, no,” he said. “I’m talking about minerals and mining. I’m talking about real wealth.”
“So am I,” I said.
This summer, independent travelers are flooding into Alaska before the big ships return, some to Glacier Bay. There, in Bartlett Cove, near park headquarters, they discover the full skeleton of a humpback whale, the one known as Snow, 13.7m long, mounted off the ground in a graceful arc, as if flying.
After much of her body had decomposed on shore, park staff and volunteers, including schoolchildren, donated more than 1,000 hours to clean her 161 bones. The money Princess paid in restitution was then used to build an open-sided outdoor pavilion and to re-articulate Snow into a work of art.
Visitors stand before her, often in awe. They quietly read about her life and death, and find themselves enriched. Not because they have been entertained; they have been educated.
A former ranger in Alaska’s Glacier Bay, Denali and Katmai national parks, Kim Heacox is the author of many books. Portions of this opinion piece are excerpted from his Alaska memoirs, The Only Kayak: A Journey into the Heart of Alaska and Rhythm of the Wild: A Life Inspired by Alaska’s Denali National Park.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS