To the world’s investors, the saga over Didi Global has made China’s biggest technology firms a riskier bet as President Xi Jinping (習近平) seeks to control one of the country’s most valuable resources: big data.
Didi is by most measures an appealing success story. The firm controls almost the entire ride-hailing market in China, and counts Softbank Group and Tencent Holdings as major shareholders.
Didi was actually profitable in the first quarter, a rarity for the industry. Its initial public offering (IPO) last week was the second-biggest in the US by a company based in China, and it was well received. Didi sold 317 million shares — about 10 percent more than planned.
Illustration: Tania Chou
Yet the listing on the eve of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) centenary did not appear to trigger celebration back in Beijing. Instead, two days after the IPO, China’s cyberspace regulator said it was reviewing the company on national security grounds. Two days after that, the regulator said the firm had committed serious contraventions in the collection and usage of personal information. It then ordered the company’s app to be removed from stores.
The stock plunged 28 percent in pre-market trading on Tuesday as US markets reopened.
What made Didi so valuable to investors is the same thing that makes it and other tech companies a potential threat to Beijing: It holds vast amounts of sensitive data from half a billion annual active users, mostly in China. Over the past year, Xi’s government has sought to gain control of this data, to protect users from abuse and find a way to use it to spur broad-based economic growth rather than simply enrich a cohort of billionaires that could potentially challenge the CCP’s authority.
The Cyberspace Administration of China suggested Didi delay its IPO weeks before the debut to check its network security, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people with knowledge of the matter. The watchdog was particularly concerned that listing in the US would require Didi to disclose its major vendors and suppliers, which could leave it vulnerable to security breaches, it said, citing unidentified people.
Didi said in an e-mailed statement on Monday that it was unaware of the Chinese watchdog’s decision to suspend user registrations and remove Didi Chuxing from app stores ahead of its listing.
Didi, like many other Chinese tech giants, grew rapidly in the absence of comprehensive oversight. Beijing is seeking to plug regulatory loopholes, but it needs more time. By listing in the US, Didi effectively sidestepped an extensive approval process by China’s securities watchdog at a time when officials have pushed for more firms to raise funds at home.
“Beijing is not pleased to see its national champions cozying up to foreign stakeholders,” said Xiaomeng Lu (魯曉萌), a senior analyst at Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy. “It also wants tech companies to keep their core assets — data and algorithms — in China.”
Some projections show China will hold a third of the world’s data by 2025, giving it potentially a massive competitive advantage in areas such as artificial intelligence that would drive the modern economy.
The geopolitical stakes are also high: US President Joe Biden’s administration is reviewing what user data should be off limits to China, and Beijing is similarly concerned about handing over information that could be used by its adversaries.
China’s campaign to impose tougher controls on the nation’s tech firms accelerated late last year as the country recovered from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and tensions with the US intensified. Officials launched a powerful broadside on the fintech sector when they pulled Ant Group’s US$35 billion dual listing in Shanghai and Hong Kong at the 11th hour.
Like Didi, Ant dominated its field. In just a decade, the firm, an affiliate of Jack Ma’s (馬雲) Alibaba Group, had grown to reshape the lives of millions of Chinese through its Alipay app as well as the giant Yu’ebao money-market fund.
By March, it was clear authorities were widening the offensive. Xi, at a meeting of the CCP’s top financial advisory committee, warned that Beijing would go after so-called “platform” companies that have amassed data and market power. This term effectively covers a range of firms that offer services to hundreds of millions, from Didi to food delivery giant Meituan and e-commerce leaders such as JD.com.
The crackdown has weighed heavily on the tech sector.
Alibaba’s Hong Kong-traded shares have lost 33 percent since their October high, while Tencent — which is China’s leader in social media, games and music publishing — is down 28 percent since a record in January. Didi fell as much as 11 percent on Friday last week.
China is not alone in trying to control the dominance of large technology firms. US Congress is seeking to force companies such as Amazon.com and Apple to radically change their business models, while Google faces a sweeping EU probe into its advertising technology.
“We have entered a new period globally where the regulatory scrutiny on tech has increased and will be ongoing for some time,” said Joshua Crabb, a senior portfolio manager at Robeco in Hong Kong.
The scale and speed of Xi’s campaign speaks to the CCP’s obsession with control. The party is battling what it sees to be multiple threats to national security, and its five-year plan in October included a focus on security issues for the first time. A rivalry with the US is only intensifying under the Biden administration, which recently rallied allies to present a more united front against Beijing.
The issue is Chinese entrepreneurs often turn to US stock exchanges, which offer founders something they cannot get at home. A deep pool of international capital and lower barriers to entry mean the world’s largest market remains a key destination for Chinese and Hong Kong firms, who were fundraising at a record pace earlier in the year.
Potential forced delistings by the New York Stock Exchange and tougher requirements on the NASDAQ have been no deterrent to Chinese companies in need of cash.
Although the CCP has little say over the US listing process for its private companies, it can often nudge top-level management. Exerting influence over a business’s operations — like it did for Didi — is a far bolder move and puts the government’s stamp on the US stock market.
China’s cyberspace regulator “is trying to step in to exert their influence in this whole process,” said Feng Chucheng (馮楚城), cofounder and partner of Plenum, a research firm specializing in China’s politics and economy. “They’re trying to use Didi to set up this example of how a company will become listed in New York moving forward.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and