After 16 years under the leadership of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Germany is to vote for a new chancellor at the end of September. The post-COVID-19 economic recovery and immigration are all on the ballot.
However, there is no mistaking this election as a climate vote.
Case in point is the dramatic rise of the Green Party, up from 8 percent in the polls three years ago, to contend for the chancellorship under the leadership of 40-year-old, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)-trained Annalena Baerbock.
The Greens have been in government before, but never standing the chancellor. For climate watchers, such a win would send significant signals well beyond German borders.
With climate ranking unusually high among domestic political considerations, I asked German energy economist Claudia Kemfert for help making sense of it all.
Kemfert is a prominent figure in the nation’s debates over climate policy, and even though we are both native German speakers, she preferred to converse in English — “just simpler that way,” she said — only to switch for the occasional idiom that has no equivalent.
Kemfert threw her hands in the air when asked what will happen in September: “Who knows, it’s campaign silly season.”
Or in a German phrase, loosely translated: “Every day, there’s a new sow being driven through town.”
There is always some scandal of the moment that captures the news cycle. The day we spoke, it was accusations that Baerbock was somehow associating herself with slave masters, invoking vivid images of Nazi ideology and talk of an Aryan “master race,” because she had earned a master’s degree from LSE.
To Kemfert, Germany’s climate approach is largely a question of speed toward decarbonization and the finer details of who pays for what, rather than the US-style debate on whether climate change is real.
Merkel’s successor at the helm of the conservatives, Armin Laschet, “will continue the energy transition,” Kemfert said.
It would not be as ambitious as under a Green chancellor, but Germany’s parliamentary system forces a coalition government, making it all but certain that post-election climate policies would be a mix of party positions.
The small neoliberal Free Democratic Party, for example, would not be in a position to claim the chancellorship.
However, some of their positions might well be reflected in the eventual government, should they be asked to help form a governing coalition. In line with its libertarian leanings, the party is against mandating solar panels on new buildings while focusing on the role of technologies such as synthetic fuels.
This focus on research and development into new technologies, rather than the deployment of existing ones, is somewhat similar to elements of the Republication Party in the US that claim to want to reduce carbon emissions, but it would only delay the inevitable.
In Germany, unlike the US, any delay would need to fit under a national carbon-reduction law.
“The law is the law,” Kemfert said, pointing to a German high court ruling in April demanding that the government speed up its decarbonization plans.
The court was enforcing compliance with Germany’s 2019 Federal Climate Change Act.
Amazingly, Merkel’s government reacted almost immediately by increasing 2030 emissions targets to 65 percent below 1990 levels, up from 55 percent before the ruling. The government also pulled forward its net-zero emissions target by five years to 2045.
Kemfert points to how this rapid move suggests the government had been ready to set more ambitious targets all along.
“These kinds of changes don’t typically happen almost overnight,” she said.
Her hope now is that a new government might be able to set an even more ambitious target than 2045.
Under Merkel’s leadership, Germany has undergone one of the more significant energy transformations. A country dominated for decades by coal energy now gets about half of its electricity from carbon-free sources.
Among large developed economies, only the UK has achieved a faster coal exit — although the British switch embraced natural gas.
Germany made a deliberate push for renewable energy, supported by ambitious policies such as feed-in-tariffs, guaranteeing favorable long-term contracts to wind, solar photovoltaics and other renewable producers.
Not all is rosy in Germany. Kemfert pointed out how much of her country’s decarbonization strategy so far has been focused on transforming the power sector. That alone cannot accomplish Germany’s goals.
Next up are transport and home heating, backed by carbon prices slated to increase from 25 euros (US$30) per tonne of carbon dioxide to 55 euros to 65 euros per tonne within five years.
That generates predictable political debates in relatively car-dependent Germany. It also shows the path forward for others, including potentially the US.
Germany has found success with its sector-by-sector approach to climate policy, with the EU’s Emissions Trading System as an important backbone. Germany adopted targeted and highly technocratic policies at first, and now its early push for renewables allows for ever greater ambition.
German stoicism, including from the very top, surely helped. Merkel was famous for her saying Wir schaffen das — “We can do it”— in the face of the 2015 refugee crisis. The same three words could be applied to the country’s approach to the energy transition. German stoicism in action.
Gernot Wagner writes the Risky Climate column for Bloomberg Green. He teaches at New York University and is a coauthor of Climate Shock.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.