The last time Syria held a presidential election in 2014, there was no question over whether Syrian President Bashar al-Assad would win — but with opposition forces in control of the country’s cities, as well as the suburbs of the capital, Damascus, his future was still far from certain.
Seven years later, after the regime’s Russian and Iranian allies intervened and turned the tide of the country’s civil war, most of Syria is now back under al-Assad’s grip.
Syrians yesterday returned to the polling booths for a sham democratic display designed to give the president a veneer of legitimacy at home and abroad.
“In 2014 the mood was different. Al-Assad could still have gone. Now Syrians still in the country, and all of us who left, know that there will not be a military overthrow,” said Suhail al-Ghazi, a researcher and nonresident fellow at the Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy. “The elections will be used by both the regime and Russia to show that they won, and they claim Syria is safe, so refugees can return. The election is also a factor in rehabilitating the regime among Arab countries, and maybe the Arab League.”
Syria has been ruled by the al-Assad family since 1970, after which the Syrian parliament and government were stripped of many decisionmaking powers and important positions were filled with loyalists as the Baath party worked to consolidate its status as “leader of the state and society.”
Bashar al-Assad was the third choice as successor of his father, Hafez al-Assad, as president, taking over after the latter’s death in 2000.
The mild-mannered ophthalmologist at the time said that he wanted to bring genuine political reform to the country, but ended up inflicting even more brutality than his father.
Street protests during the Arab Spring in 2011 were met with extreme violence from the police state, and spiraled into a complex and intractable civil war.
In the early days of the uprising, large numbers of military and party officials defected in protest against the government crackdown.
As the level of dissent across Syria’s stratified society began to make itself felt, the emboldened opposition in 2013 boycotted parliamentary elections.
A hollow attempt at mollifying public opinion was made in the 2014 presidential elections, when the regime allowed multiparty elections for the first time — but Bashar al-Assad unsurprisingly still won nearly 90 percent of the vote after a campaign in which one opposition candidate told voters the incumbent should remain president.
This year’s campaigning began after the Syrian Supreme Constitutional Court a week ago approved three out of 51 candidate applications: former Syrian lawmaker Abdullah Salloum Abdullah; Mahmoud Ahmad Marie, who is part of UN-sponsored peace talks in Geneva; and Bashar al-Assad himself.
All three candidates have pledged to repair the economy, which last year collapsed under the weight of war, sanctions and COVID-19, and bring the country’s 5 million refugees home.
Abdullah also made a bold promise to tackle corruption, which is systemic in Syria.
An amnesty earlier this month for more than 400 civil servants, judges, lawyers and journalists detained in a crackdown on social media dissent was widely viewed by rights advocates and the loved ones of tens of thousands of detainees still missing in regime prisons as lip-service to democratic norms before the poll.
“My brother disappeared into a regime prison in 2013. We still have no idea if he is alive or dead. They won’t give us any information,” said Saed Eido, a former resident of the country’s northern city of Aleppo who now lives in Turkey.
“All this presidential election does is whitewash crimes and maintain a dictatorship,” Eido said.
Al-Ghazi echoed these remarks, saying that the election is a useful propaganda tool for Bashar al-Assad.
“The regime has always made people do this to prove their loyalty: marching in parades, waving banners, turning up in large numbers to vote. For the new generation it’s also a chance to create a sense of community and nationhood,” he said. “Today’s young people in Syria have never experienced any political activity that is not linked to armed activity. It’s a break from their terrible reality, almost, a way for the regime to make them feel included, bring them into the system, make them feel like they belong.”
A crash in the value of Syria’s currency early last year meant that about 90 percent of people living in regime-controlled areas are now living in deep poverty. Public criticism of deteriorating living conditions is not tolerated, but even so, the situation has triggered unrest in areas of Syria where the regime’s grip is more tenuous.
In Druze-majority Sweida in the country’s southwest, election billboards erected last week were torn and splashed with red paint within hours.
The election also blackballs years of UN-backed efforts to end the war, including forming a transitional governing body and rewriting the Syrian constitution to hold free and fair elections subject to international monitoring.
“Many civilizations, invaders and colonizers have passed through Syria, but today they are just remnants of the past and historical sites,” Eido said.
“The regime is not there to rule, just to steal the livelihoods of its own people. That’s why, like the others, it won’t last. It can’t sustain itself for ever,” he said.
On Tuesday, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) issued a statement criticizing Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a student from Shanghai’s Fudan University, saying she had offended the sensibilities of Taiwanese. It also called for the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation — established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — which had organized the tour group, to remind group members to be careful with their statements. Song, during a visit to a baseball stadium in Taichung, said that the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team (中國台北隊) ... we wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
Late on Tuesday evening, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law. A BBC analysis cited as reasons the opposition parties’ majority in the National Assembly, their continued boycott of the national budget and the impeachment of key officials and prosecutors, leading to frequent government gridlock. During the years that Taiwan and South Korea traveled the road to democratization, our countries hit many potholes. Taiwan cannot return to the Martial Law era. Despite the similarities in our authoritarian past, Yoon’s political travails are far removed from the issues Taiwan faces. Yoon’s actions are a wake-up call to the world about
Imagine that you are fully conscious, but your family, friends and healthcare workers all believe you are vegetative. You hear people discussing euthanasia, cessation of medical treatment, or moving you to a long-term care facility, none of which are able to monitor for signs of recovery. Illness is intrinsically terrifying, but nothing terrifies more than to be fully aware while those you love and those who decide your medical fate regard you as nothing more than an insentient collection of water, calcium and organic molecules. Fifteen years ago, it was discovered that more than 40 percent of patients diagnosed as
RSS