Children’s judo injuries
I am Keiko Kobayashi, a founding member of the Japan Judo Accident Victims Association (JJAVA). The article about the severe judo injury of a seven-year-old boy in Taiwan was a great shock to us (“Boy ‘near brain-dead’ after judo training incident,” April 25, page 2). The JJAVA is an organization that aims to eliminate children’s judo injuries in Japan, and it was started five years after my son was severely injured by a judo coach during club practice at a junior-high school 16 years ago.
Unfortunately, a surprising number of children have sustained serious judo injuries in Japan over many years. Since 1983, 121 children under the age of 18 have died in relation to judo under school supervision, not including children who died due to injuries at private judo clubs. It is a significant issue in Japan.
According to professional studies, many judo instructors in Japan have not learned how to teach judo safely, particularly to beginners. Since judo is a martial art, if coaches apply techniques to children without consideration, it might easily lead to serious injuries.
The following is a paper I wrote on the possible causes and mechanism of judo injuries, which also explains how they occur in Japan: https://safety.nagaokaut.ac.jp/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/anzen_03-04.pdf
It is written in Japanese, but if you read it using DeepL translation it might help you understand how children like the seven-year-old boy in your country are seriously injured in judo practice. It is an attempted murder, not an accident. The criminal responsibility of the coach should be investigated to prevent these terrible injuries.
For your reference, no child under 18 has died due to judo injury in the UK, France, Germany, the US, Canada or Australia in the past 20 years, according to our study.
Japan Judo Accident Victims Association
Legislator’s careless words
During a discussion forum at the legislature on April 23, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lee De-wei (李德維) asked where imports of US pork have ended up in the nation, following the government’s relaxation of controls on US pork imports with ractopamine residues.
“Is it possible that the pork knuckles sold on Wanluan Street [a street in Pingtung County famous for pork knuckles] are a mixture of US and domestically produced pork?” Lee asked.
It just so happens that I went to Wanluan Street a few days ago to feast on pork knuckles. I noticed prominent signs outside every vendor proudly displaying the “Taiwan pork” logo. I walked into one shop and ordered a plate of pork trotters, which arrived glistening in stewed sauce. The fatty meat was not overly greasy, and the lean meat was moist. Dipped into the restaurant’s special preparation of garlic soy sauce, the combination was a heavenly delight. I can still taste the wonderful flavors as I write.
I wonder how many of the Wanluan Street vendors have been left emotionally wounded and their businesses damaged by Lee’s careless words?
Lee was wrong to cast aspersions on pork knuckle vendors without a shred of evidence. Consumers who had no reason to be concerned, after Lee’s intervention, might be worried about the origin of pork knuckles and less willing to eat them.
In Taiwan, pork knuckle is a favorite delicacy and the industry is sizable, employing many people. How many livelihoods have been affected by Lee’s careless remarks? It is also unfair to vendors who honestly label the origin of their meat.
In addition to making a formal apology to Wanluan Street pork knuckle vendors, Lee should visit the famous street to inspect it for himself and sample its delicious Taiwanese pork delicacies.
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has over the past few months continued to escalate its hegemonic rhetoric and increase its incursions into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone. The US, in turn, has finally realized how its “strategic ambiguity” is increasingly wearing thin. Similarly, any hopes the US had that the PRC would be a responsible stakeholder and economic player have diminished, if not been abandoned. Taiwan, of course, remains as the same de facto independent, democratic nation that the PRC covets. As a result, the US needs to reconsider not only the amount, but also the type of arms
Taking advantage of my Taipei Times editors’ forbearance, I thought I would go with a change of pace by offering a few observations on an interesting nature topic, the many varieties of snakes in Taiwan. I will be drawing on my experiences living in Taiwan five times, from my teenage years in Kaohsiung back in the early sixties, to my last assignment as American Institute in Taiwan Director in 2006-9. Taiwan, with its semitropical climate, is a perfect setting for serpents. Indeed, one might say serpents are an integral part of the island’s ecosystem. Taiwan is warm, humid, with lots of
China constantly seeks out ways to complain about perceived slights and provocations as pretexts for its own aggressive behavior. It is both victimization paranoia and a form of information warfare that keeps the West on the defensive. True to form, China objected even to the innocuous reference to Taiwan at April 16’s summit meeting between US President Joe Biden and Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga. Neither leader’s prepared remarks even mentioned Taiwan, out of deference to the Japanese side. Biden’s opening statement was modest: “Prime Minister Suga and I affirmed our ironclad support for US-Japanese alliance and for our shared security.
Determined to keep a permanent grip on power, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has abandoned former paramount leader Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) dogma of “hiding our capacities and biding our time” along with the “peaceful development” line that prevailed under former Chinese presidents Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and Hu Jintao (胡錦濤). Instead, he is treading a “wolf warrior” path of diplomacy that resorts to coercion, debt entrapment and hostage-taking. Externally, Xi’s China has claimed that it would never seek hegemony, yet it challenges the free, rules-based international order wherever it can. While insisting that it will not export its ideology, it has