TRA fares the answer
Consumers’ Foundation honorary chairman Cheng Jen-hung (程仁宏) on Saturday last week weighed in on the debate over whether the Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA) should raise fares to stabilize its business model and make more funds available to improve safety.
Cheng called on the TRA to implement a comprehensive review of its operating model before adjusting fares.
Cheng’s argument contains a logical fallacy, as adjusting fares and implementing a review are not mutually exclusive. They can be done in parallel.
The TRA last adjusted its fares 26 years ago. Does Cheng really mean that until a review is carried out by the Executive Yuan, fares should continue to be frozen into eternity?
There are several reasons to support a reasonable increase in fares:
As regards the nearly three-decade fare freeze, there is an old saying that “you cannot expect a horse to gallop on an empty stomach.”
The TRA’s financial model is clearly broken. A reasonable fare hike would relieve pressure and help quicken the pace of reform. TRA Director-General Du Wei (杜微) has said that “increasing fares would be an important measure to allow the TRA to maintain normal operations.”
If the public wants high-quality services, then it must accept a reasonable increase in fares. Demanding safe and high-quality service when the TRA loses NT$4 million (US$143,113) a day is completely unreasonable.
Moreover, the TRA’s losses are being plugged by the central bank. In other words, the public is subsidizing rail travel through general taxation, whether they use the TRA or not. Surely, those who use the service should pay for it.
The government should establish a stable and transparent long-term fare adjustment structure for the TRA, similar to how gasoline and electricity prices are regulated, which would return the TRA to being a market-oriented organization.
In the same way that a rising tide lifts all boats, fare increases would help elevate the service quality and safety on the network.
Tsai Chi-keng
Taipei
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
During an impromptu Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) rally on Tuesday last week to protest what the party called the unfairness of the judicial system, a young TPP supporter said that if Taiwan goes to war, he would “surrender to the [Chinese] People’s Liberation Army [PLA] with unyielding determination.” The rally was held after former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng’s (彭振聲) wife took her life prior to Pong’s appearance in court to testify in the Core Pacific corruption case involving former Taipei mayor and TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). The TPP supporter said President William Lai (賴清德) was leading them to die on