The slate of candidates vying to succeed German Chancellor Angela Merkel is now clear — and so is the unenviable pile of global problems the eventual winner is to inherit.
Merkel’s impending departure after 16 years as chancellor brings into play not simply the direction of Europe’s biggest economy, but the balance of power on the continent. With the world increasingly defined by a great power rivalry reminiscent of the 19th century, the winner of September’s federal election is to face international demands from the get-go.
The administration of US President Joe Biden is already seeking a clear line from Berlin on issues from China and Russia to the tussle for control of key technologies.
Illustration: Mountain People
Germany is faced with questions of how closely to cleave to Washington as the EU tries to carve out a bigger global role for the 27-nation bloc.
The COVID-19 pandemic adds another layer of pressure as the race to secure vaccines, coupled with the ongoing fallout from the UK’s departure from the EU, signals a return to countries acting for themselves, the sort of nation-state era that Germany has long repudiated.
Those external burdens land at the door of Berlin in the run-up to the most unpredictable vote arguably since a Cold War spying scandal in 1974 forced then-West German chancellor Willy Brandt’s resignation.
His successor, Helmut Schmidt, two years later took on then-Christian Democratic Union (CDU) leader Helmut Kohl in his first electoral test since the affair, and won.
The question is whether the next chancellor is prepared to build a level of global responsibility that befits Europe’s dominant power. Providing an answer will fall to one of an array of candidates relatively untested in the international sphere.
Armin Laschet, minister president of Germany’s most populous state of North-Rhine Westphalia, is the pick for Merkel’s CDU-led bloc, and — at least until a poll released on Tuesday — the favorite to succeed her as chancellor.
While he would normally be expected to maintain Merkel’s centrist course, a bruising and very public battle for the conservative ticket leaves him at the head of a campaign troubled from the start, potentially staying his hand even if he wins the top office.
The risk is that the next leadership in Germany turns further inward to deal with political divisions at home, leaving Europe without one of its biggest anchors for problems that affect the continent.
While Merkel’s bloc this year plunged in the polls amid the wrestling to replace her, the full effect of the chancellor’s departure is yet to come, said Jacob Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
The conservative alliance could have further to fall, especially with the spectacle of what was “a pretty unsavory knife fight” between Laschet and his rival for the candidacy, Bavarian Minister President Markus Soder, Kirkegaard said.
That means that the German election remains “incredibly open,” he added.
Kirkegaard spoke before a Forsa poll conducted on Tuesday showing that a 4 percentage point lead for Merkel’s bloc over the Greens had turned into a 7 percentage point deficit within just one week. Even with the caveats of polling volatility, that raises expectations on Greens candidate Annalena Baerbock, a German lawmaker who has not served in government at federal or state level.
German Minister of Finance Olaf Scholz, the Social Democratic candidate, has the most government experience, but his party is a distant third.
With the general polling trend suggesting that the Greens are poised for a role in government, either as “a very senior partner” to the conservative bloc or occupying the chancellery, that would mean a harder line on Russia and China, “which would herald that the mercantilist approach to foreign policy that Merkel in many ways, certainly vis-a-vis China, espouses is really coming to an end,” Kirkegaard said.
Times of crisis also see Europe looking to Germany for strong leadership, and the fiscal and economic challenges from the pandemic are to require a strong hand.
Merkel’s concession to allow limited European debt sales opened the way to the EU’s recovery fund, a step that remains contentious among her bloc if not for the Greens.
She helped steer Europe through the eurozone debt crisis, along with then-European Central Bank president Mario Draghi, who is now Italian prime minister.
Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin has sent geopolitical tensions spiking with a buildup of Russian troops on the border with Ukraine, while Kremlin critic Alexey Navalny is in poor health in a prison hospital outside Moscow.
Western leaders have warned of a fresh downturn in ties with Moscow if Navalny were to die, and further reprisals.
Equally, Merkel has repeatedly argued for keeping the lines of communication open with Moscow and has been someone Putin is at least willing to talk to.
Her successor would need to take a lead role in navigating ties with Russia at potentially one of the trickiest times since the Cold War.
Questions about the country’s role are as old as the German Empire, forged in 1871 out of its constituent states from “blood and iron,” in the words of Otto von Bismarck, its architect and first chancellor.
The empire, also known as the Second Reich, brought together territories from west of the Rhine River to present-day Russian Kaliningrad Oblast, with Prussia the dominant force.
However, the unity that allowed its formation was won through Bismarck’s deployment of targeted military aggression against Denmark, followed by Austria and France.
Commemorations of the 150th anniversary of its founding are muted. German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who in January held a symposium with historians to mark the event, noted some contemporary parallels.
The empire’s development as “a global military and economic power” reminds us of China’s rise today, he said.
Germany’s rapid modernization also spurred feelings of anxiety, nationalism and populism that are showing up again, this time fueled by concerns over globalization.
The German empire’s creation “completely tilted the power balance and created this heavyweight right in the middle of Europe,” said Katja Hoyer, a historian and author of the book Blood and Iron: The Rise and Fall of the German Empire 1871-1918.
The question of its geopolitical positioning “remains essentially unresolved,” she added.
Germany adopted a reticence in foreign affairs in the second half of last century as a counterpoint to its belligerence of the first half. That hesitancy became all the more acute when reunification in 1990 recreated a European power still reluctant to assume a more active international presence on matters other than trade.
Former German chancellor Gerhard Schroder inched Germany forward, and Merkel has raised the country’s horizons further, but topics such as defense spending remain highly controversial with the public.
Merkel’s successor is to face pressure to coax Germany into becoming more actively involved.
German Ambassador to the US Emily Haber sees China and the race between “tech democracies and tech autocracies” as the defining issue of our times.
Germany is already on board, helping Europe shift its position so that it and Biden now “agree on the fundamentals,” she said during a German Marshall Fund event on transatlantic relations.
It is long overdue for Hoyer.
“Germany has this eternal problem, I think since 1871, of what it wants to be, and where its place is in the world and in Europe,” she said. “It’s going to be interesting to see what the next chancellor does going forward.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry