In recent years, I have searched for podcast news programs, even though news podcasts with frequent updates and rich content are difficult to find, due to a business model that mainly relies on commercial sponsorship.
I find myself instead listening to the New Folder (新資料夾), a podcast news series hosted by independent Taipei City Councilor Chiu Wei-chieh (邱威傑), who is also a YouTuber better known as “Froggy” (呱吉).
Although the show offers more entertainment than news, and Froggy and cohost Liou Cai-ling (劉采翎) have no journalism background, they do not cut corners on fact-checking.
If they did not verify the news in advance, all of the discussion, analyses, laughing and cursing would be of no value.
In late January, the English journal Information, Communication & Society published an article titled “Legitimating a Platform: Evidence of Journalists’ Role in Transferring Authority to Twitter.” The study found that journalists are transferring their authority to social media.
After an analysis of hundreds of US news stories containing tweets in 2018, the article said that “journalists have come to treat tweets more like content, an interchangeable building block of news, than like sources, whose ideas and messages must be subject to scrutiny and verification.”
Journalism is a profession based on facts, but facts do not verify themselves. After verification, the journalist can analyze the facts, comment on them and provide guidance based on them.
However, over the past year, headlines containing phrases such as “exposed on the Internet” or “stuns the Internet” have become common, and some news stories are simply credited to “coordinated reports” or “comprehensive reports,” without being attributed to a journalist.
These news stories typically use social media content as sources, while the reporters are acting like any other Internet user.
The widespread use of such content might be related to the survival strategies and division of labor in today’s media.
However, those in the news business have neither the time nor the interest to run their social media accounts, while editors in social media look down on the media’s content and productivity. As a result, the media have begun to use platforms for their large volume of irresponsible content, which generates a higher flow of news stories.
As journalists continue to transfer verification to social media, and social media are incapable and unwilling, under their business model, to take greater responsibility for fact-checking, who becomes the victim?
If the media are untrustworthy and social media are irresponsible, people in democratic societies do not have access to reliable information. How can they judge whether to support government policies?
There is an increased risk that Internet users will end up supporting Chinese propaganda, becoming “little pink ones” (小粉紅), or young Chinese nationalists online, without even joining Beijing’s “50 Cent Army” (reportedly what it pays Internet moderators in yuan per post).
Of course, the responsibility does not rest solely with the news media and social media.
In the Internet era, when almost anyone can disseminate information online through social media, everyone must responsibly distribute information, and not just give in to their emotional reactions. That way, each and every person makes at least some small contribution to democracy.
Chang Yueh-han is an assistant professor in Shih Hsin University’s Department of Journalism.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs