Mention the Boxer Rebellion nowadays and most people in the West would look baffled. Not so the Chinese, who have longer memories.
They have not forgotten the invasion launched in 1900 by the US, Britain, Germany, France and other members of the so-called Eight Nation Alliance to suppress the anti-foreigner, anti-missionary uprising.
Mass atrocities against Chinese ensued in the name of upholding “civilized” Christian values.
That bitter legacy was recalled last week by Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Hua Chunying (華春瑩) after a not dissimilar Western coalition, including Britain, imposed limited sanctions on China over human rights abuses in Xinjiang.
“Their actions have reminded people of the history of the Eight Nation Alliance, but China is no longer what it was 120 years ago,” Hua said. “No one should dare to offend the Chinese people.”
Yet many do dare — and now the boot is on the other foot.
It is Beijing that stands accused of atrocities, with the US and others alleging a genocide of Xinjiang’s Uighurs.
And it is mostly the same Western countries, plus Canada and minus Tsarist Russia, that are on the receiving end of Chinese aggression.
For the new sanctions provoked an unexpectedly sharp, escalatory response. Beijing targeted members of the European parliament, diplomats, academics and non-governmental institutions critical of China — and on Friday last week added some British members of parliament to the list.
The EU, which had limited its measures to officials only, was shocked.
It had expected a reciprocal slap on the wrist. Instead it received a hard kick right up its boxer shorts.
Nor was this the worst of it. Outraged by comments posted on Twitter by Chinese Ambassador to France Lu Shaye (盧沙野), Beijing’s “wolf warrior” envoy, in which he described a respected French academic as a “crazed hyena” and “small-time hoodlum.”
French Secretary of State for European Affairs Clement Beaune summoned the wayward diplomat for a customary dressing-down.
Imagine his horror when Lu, ignoring protocol, said he was too busy to go.
The French were aghast.
“This is not how things are done,” Beaune spluttered. “Neither France nor Europe is a doormat.”
DISPENSABLE
Yet this increasingly appears to be how Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the Chinese Communist Party view the EU.
Or if not exactly a doormat, then a decidedly second-rate, fractious power bloc whose business and goodwill are dispensable.
The way they see it, Europe needs China more than China needs Europe.
So when livid members of the European Parliament last week threatened to tear up a new investment deal, the reaction was a contemptuous shrug.
Like the old imperial powers that tormented it, China plays divide and rule. It is an influential investor in southern EU countries, notably Italy, Greece and Portugal, that are poor relations to the wealthier north. It has cultivated recalcitrant EU members, such as Hungary and EU wannabes such as Serbia.
It dangles trade and investment carrots in return for a blind eye.
This appeals to a self-described “fervent Sinophile,” British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who, as always, wants to have his cake and eat it.
Johnson seeks the freedom to increase trade with China and simultaneously strike a noble pose on human rights.
As a result, he achieves neither.
Johnson, the man who gave up Hong Kong without a fight, risks becoming Beijing’s useful idiot.
By adding British MPs and organizations to its sanctions list, China shows how unimpressed it is by his feeble, Brexit-warped balancing act.
While last week’s chastening events reminded Europe that it lives in a reborn age of unequal treaties, it also seems clear that a bullish Xi seriously overplayed his hand.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, making a first visit to NATO and the EU, took full advantage.
RETURN TO THE US
Fresh from a bruising encounter with his Chinese counterpart in Alaska, Blinken sought to refortify the transatlantic alliance vis-a-vis China and Russia following the corrosive years of former US president Donald Trump — and it appears that he succeeded.
Blinken’s call to close ranks against China’s threat to “the international system and the values we share” was lapped up.
Chummy and grinning, US President Joe Biden reinforced it by video link from Washington.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel paid routine obeisance to “European sovereignty.”
Yet despite the best efforts of French President Emmanuel Macron, the EU still lacks an agreed vision for an independent global strategic role.
European leaders seem only too happy to scuttle back under the US security umbrella.
Weakened by the COVID-19 pandemic, facing a power vacuum in Berlin and handicapped by inept leadership in Brussels, it is unsurprising that the EU, shoved hard by China, has again flopped into the US’ outstretched arms.
But pause right there.
The Biden-Blinken approach to China looks remarkably similar to Trump-style confrontation.
There have been no conciliatory gestures, no olive branches since the new guys took charge in Washington.
Trump’s tech and tariff wars persist today. The Taiwan and South China Sea timebombs are still ticking away. China has not given an inch, either.
In truth, relations are steadily deteriorating — with polarizing effect.
Washington and Beijing are busily strengthening rival global alliances — the US with Europe, Japan and South Korea, China with Russia and in the Middle East.
Significantly, Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) is visiting Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iran, all three at odds with Biden.
It would be nice to be wrong, but this looks like a geopolitical warm-up for Cold War No. 2.
Has Europe signed up for this? Not really, but its desire for business as normal with Beijing is coming up hard against the ugly reality of Xi’s swaggering authoritarianism.
There is diminishing wiggle room for leaders who do not say where they stand.
Which brings us back to Britain’s “fervent Sinophile,” who dares not utter the word “genocide.”
Whose side is Johnson actually on?
Poor fool. It is entirely possible that he does not know.
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use