In the German town of Dessau, one of the sites of the Bauhaus art school, an institute was set up in 1921 to mass-produce vaccines that later helped strengthen the German Democratic Republic. Exactly 100 years later, the site is gearing up to be a one-stop shop to produce COVID-19 vaccines for Germany’s pandemic response.
It is just one example of a rash of efforts by governments across the globe to access fragmented vaccine production, after manufacturing setbacks deprived EU members of drugs made on their own soil this year. From Australia to Thailand, states planning home-based vaccine plants are starting to reshape the industry.
The German venture has the backing of the regional government, as part of a national effort to secure supplies and add vaccines to Germany’s exports.
Illustration: Mountain People
Saxony-Anhalt Premier Reiner Haseloff said he believes Germany could become a swing producer of vaccines, in the same way that power companies maintain capacity for times of strong demand.
“Ultimately, this is comparable to the energy industry, where the state also pays to keep power plants in reserve,” Haseloff told reporters.
Unlike the US, where the government’s Operation Warp Speed began funding the expansion and retrofit of pharmaceutical manufacturing sites early in the pandemic, few countries globally have the option to commandeer factories. The German plan is one of more than half a dozen by governments around the world to avert shortages by supporting drug companies’ local production.
Some — including Australia, Brazil, Japan and Thailand — are setting up manufacturing partnerships with Swedish drugmaker AstraZeneca.
Italy has pledged state backing for a public-private vaccine production center, while Austria, Denmark and Israel plan a joint research and development fund, and would explore whether to produce their own next-generation vaccines.
India plays a significant role in vaccine production globally, and the US, Japan and Australia also plan to help finance vaccine production capacity there, a senior US administration official told reporters.
The moves aim to address a global shortage of doses. With vaccines key to restart economies, some countries have pre-purchase agreements to secure their supply.
TWO BILLION DOSES
The vaccine crunch in Europe has shown that states that depend on deliveries from multinationals can be vulnerable. In January, AstraZeneca cut supplies to the bloc by more than half for the first and second quarters of this year, and told Brussels that it was not able to divert Belgian-made drugs that were earmarked for the UK.
The cut heightened tensions between London and Brussels, and prompted European leaders to set curbs on exports of vaccines made in the EU — starting this month, when Italy blocked exports of AstraZeneca’s shot.
Germany is a net importer of all vaccines, with a US$720 million trade deficit in this area. Berlin plans to change that, and Germany’s former “Bacterial Institute of the Anhalt Counties” in Dessau is to help.
Now a family-owned firm called IDT Biologika, it and AstraZeneca plan to invest more than 100 million euros (US$119 million) to expand the plant into a factory for complete vaccines.
The company said it aims to make between 30 million and 40 million doses a month from the end of next year, producing the bulk vaccine and also dispensing it into vials, which chief executive Juergen Betzing told reporters would make it one of Europe’s biggest manufacturers and add capacity for at least 360 million doses a year from within the EU.
Germany has not yet reserved the right to purchase any of these vaccines, but the government wants to come up with a plan on measures to support and incentivize long-term vaccine production capacity by May 1, according to a document seen by Reuters.
A government source said drug company representatives have told Berlin that long-term purchase guarantees would be more important to their investment decisions than aid.
The IDT plant would also be able to produce vaccines for other companies and, together with a cluster of firms in Saxony-Anhalt, form the heart of a government strategy to make Germany a new center for vaccine production in Europe.
Berlin is targeting an annual capacity of 2 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses from IDT and other facilities, a person familiar with the matter told reporters.
For comparison, AstraZeneca has stated its ambitions to produce up to 3 billion doses of its vaccine by the end of this year, which would make it the largest COVID-19 vaccine producer globally.
Berlin’s target could prove to be far in excess of the EU’s needs for its 450 million people, but it is not yet clear how often vaccinations will be needed to bolster immunity.
The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented challenge to inoculate billions.
While the drugs are badly needed in the near term, such piecemeal plans reflect the lack of any coherent global strategy to cover vaccination in a pandemic, which the world needs, said Robert van Exan, a consultant and former Sanofi executive.
“It takes time to build that infrastructure properly, and some thought has to go into it,” Van Exan said.
LESSONS LEARNED
Previous vaccine disputes between allies have served as a prelude to the COVID-19-era fight for supplies.
In a flu scare in 1976, the US blocked vaccine exports, derailing a vaccination plan in Canada. Ottawa learned a lesson: During the H1N1 flu pandemic of 2009, it bought drugs from a local producer, and waited until its outbreak was largely over before donating extra doses to the WHO.
Then, in the years after the 2009 pandemic, Washington paid hundreds of millions to several companies to build or expand private facilities that could be used to make and package a pandemic vaccine on short notice within the country’s borders.
When COVID-19 hit, at least two of those sites became part of Operation Warp Speed, producing vaccines for Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca and Moderna. Federal officials used the Defense Production Act to put participating companies first in line for supplies made by other US companies and the US Army Corps of Engineers directly oversaw some construction projects.
When companies struggled to hire enough qualified staff, 16 employees from the US Department of Defense were sent to work in quality control at two manufacturing sites, according to a federal report.
RUBIK’S CUBE
Globally, vaccines are manufactured across drug firms’ existing networks and often need to pass through several countries — and even between continents — before they are ready to be injected into arms.
Within the EU alone, more than 30 plants from Sweden to Spain are involved in the production of COVID-19 vaccines.
AstraZeneca said it has manufacturing capacity in 25 sites across 15 countries, in a chain of partnerships that one company executive likened to a Rubik’s Cube puzzle.
It is a similar picture for others, including vaccines made by Russia and China, and hitches are common when trying to accelerate production across multiple sites and borders.
Switzerland-based Lonza Group makes the ingredients for Moderna’s vaccine, which then go to Spain to be put into vials. Johnson & Johnson’s shot is made in the Netherlands and sent to the US for bottling. Pfizer-BioNTech has contracted factories across a network of 13 sites to meet production needs this year — their supplies to Europe also briefly fell short when a plant had to be re-engineered.
However, friction between AstraZeneca and the EU in Brussels has continued to chafe since a supplier to the drugmaker in Seneffe, Belgium, ran into difficulty in January.
AstraZeneca’s vaccine production starts with living cells being infected with a modified form of the novel coronavirus. The cells are grown in tanks, or bioreactors, harvested and purified over about two months.
Once the active ingredient is created, water and proteins are added and the liquid is bottled — a stage known as “fill and finish.” Sometimes, different stages happen at different sites.
Problems at the Belgian plant, combined with AstraZeneca’s contractual commitments to supply the UK, meant that even though the product involved was made a short drive from Brussels, EU citizens were left wanting.
The German company IDT Biologika plans to cover all stages of the cycle. Other German vaccine developers BioNTech and CureVac, which are at the forefront of new vaccine technology and have both received government funding, would also be part of Germany’s cluster.
BioNTech has brought a new German plant online to produce up to 750 million doses per year and pharma giant Bayer would help make CureVac’s shot.
The developers of the Russian vaccine, Sputnik V, have also made inquiries about producing it in the region, Haseloff said.
Russian Direct Investment Fund, which is promoting Sputnik V internationally, declined to comment.
AstraZeneca’s arrangement with IDT is similar to other deals the company has reached, for instance in Japan and Australia. Arrangements like this also help reduce the risk for companies.
AstraZeneca declined to comment on the deals it has reached, but one of its executives has said the company tried hard to create independent supply chains to enable full access to the vaccine around the world.
MAKING MONEY
Building up vaccine production capacity makes sense given the need to vaccinate the world, potentially repeatedly, against COVID-19, as well as the threat of future pandemics.
However, large manufacturing sites are the most efficient and at some point, extra capacity spread across many countries might not be economical.
Prashant Yadav, a senior fellow at the US-based Center for Global Development, said the advantages of scale kick in once you can produce at least 100 million doses per year.
He believes four or five countries could likely scale up without raising costs, but if many build small operations, “I think we get to a point where everybody will end up paying a higher price.”
In Canada, the federal government is building a publicly owned facility in Montreal that would make about 2 million vaccine doses per month beginning next year, leaving it well below that 100 million annual dose threshold.
Asked if the small size would raise costs, Canada’s National Research Council said it is not meant to compete with the private sector: “The objective of the facility is to respond quickly to future health emergencies.”
Additional reporting by Ludwig Burger, Douglas Busvine and Polina Nikolskaya
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just