Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), who has rejoined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) after nearly three decades, has said that he wants to be the KMT’s chairman and presidential candidate.
Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said that Jaw has got it wrong from the start and risks losing everything.
The KMT seems unwilling to amend its requirement that only people who have been a party member for at least one year can stand for election as chairperson.
Furthermore, KMT Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) said he wants to run for a second term.
With his party chairman dream in tatters, Jaw also has little chance of running for president.
Jaw has got himself into an awkward situation that looks like the “Soong Mayling (宋美齡) trap.” After former president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) death in 1975, his wife Soong Mayling was no match for his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), who was a fully fledged politician, so she flew off to the US on a chartered plane. Once she was there, she could no longer influence the political situation in Taiwan.
Following Chiang Ching-kuo’s death in 1988, Soong thought she could make a comeback, but she had to grudgingly accept that the much-changed political environment would no longer allow her to have a say in national affairs. All she could do was dream of her lost kingdom. For all her power and influence, “dragon empress” Soong could not make a comeback after 13 years abroad.
Jaw is not only puny compared with Soong, he has also spent 25 years in the garbage can of history. Does he really think he can make a comeback?
Whereas Soong was stuck in the Chiang-era fantasy of “counterattacking the mainland” and refusing to coexist with “outlaw” communist China, Jaw is stuck in the context of 25 years ago.
Jaw faces a younger generation that believes in “natural independence,” but he wants to link up with China.
He is way out of touch with public opinion. Jaw wants Taiwan to buy COVID-19 vaccines from China, but a poll by Global Views Monthly showed that only 1.3 percent of Taiwanese would receive a Chinese vaccine.
Jaw’s political naivete does not stop there. He has also been clamoring for President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), as chairperson of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), to pledge that she will not pursue Taiwanese independence.
First of all, the DPP has a “Taiwan independence charter” and everyone knows it as a “Taiwan independence party,” so even if Tsai does not wish to pursue independence, she could not defy the party line.
Second, if the DPP ever dropped its demand for Taiwanese independence, it would immediately turn into “KMT 2.1.” The DPP knows full well that the KMT’s niche is already occupied.
Third, whether Taiwan pursues independence would be decided by the public. Even China knows that this is unstoppable, so how could a few phrases of empty rhetoric from Jaw subdue Tsai or crush the Taiwanese independence trend?
Fourth, China’s annexation and poor treatment of Hong Kong prove that being “pro-China” is a dead-end. On an ideological and institutional level, the struggle between independence and unification is also one between democracy and dictatorship. If Taiwan had not been democratized, would there be any such thing as “independence”?
The latest issue Jaw has brought up is that of a parliamentary Cabinet system.
He is unhappy about the president having all the power, with no checks and balances. Alluding to the March 19, 2004, assassination attempt on then-president Chen Shui-bian and then-vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) when they were running for a second term, Jaw went out on a limb by saying: “It feels great to be the president, with all that power. When a president does not want to step down, that is what led to the ‘two bullets incident.’”
Jaw lost the thread even more when he said “President Tsai Ing-wen still has about three years in office and cannot serve another term, so why does not she push for a Cabinet system now?”
Jaw said that if Tsai does not do so, he would push for a Cabinet system in his first year after being elected president.
He also said that if he succeeds in getting the relevant laws amended, he would eventually stand for election as a legislator and aim to become prime minister. He is definitely counting his chickens before they are hatched.
Taiwan’s system of government is not so much a presidential system as a super-presidential one. Why did then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) want to amend the Constitution in 1997 to remove the Legislative Yuan’s power to approve the premier? It was because he thought that former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) of the KMT would be elected president and that the DPP would win a legislative majority. He got it half right.
If Tsai were to amend the Constitution to implement a Cabinet system, the DPP would definitely stay in government forever. Tsai would remain in power in three years’ time, and she could even be in office longer than former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher’s 11 years and the 15-year reign of soon-to-depart German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
Chin Heng-wei is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS