In celebrating the US’ liberation from former US president Donald Trump’s misrule, we must not forget that Trump’s presidency embodied the raw politics of US white supremacy.
He often spoke like a segregationist Southern governor from the 1960s, and, after losing last year’s election, like a secessionist senator on the eve of the Civil War.
To sustain the victory over Trump’s destructive politics, the US must overcome the racism that brought him to power. That urgent challenge faces not only the United States, but many multiethnic societies around the world.
Trump sold a segment of US society — white, older, less educated, Southern and Western, suburban and rural, evangelical Christian — on the idea that they could reclaim the US’ racist past.
That group of voters, some 20 to 25 percent of American adults, became Trump’s ardent base in the 2016 election. That base was large enough for Trump to capture the Republican Party and then to squeak to victory in the Electoral College, despite losing the popular vote by 3 million.
Other quirks of US politics enabled Trump’s 2016 win. If a high proportion of Americans voted, as in countries where registration is automatic and voting is encouraged or even mandatory, Trump would not have come close to victory in 2016.
However, impediments to voting that burden African Americans, the poor and the young are a long-standing part of US politics, their purpose being to maintain the political and economic supremacy of wealthy white people. In short, their purpose is to enable the election of the likes of Trump.
VULGAR POLITICS
Trump’s vulgar politics demonstrated the persistence of his racist appeal to older white evangelicals, and to some younger voters as well, such as those who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 and threatened to lynch then-US vice president Mike Pence for not blocking the certification of Joe Biden’s victory in the Electoral College.
Too few pundits emphasized the continuity of Trump’s racist nostalgia with the similar politics of former US president Ronald Reagan, who used the nearly identical slogan — “Let’s Make America Great Again” — for the very same purpose.
Yet racist politics is not only a US problem, although the US has been exceptionally affected by it since originating as a slaveholding society. Trump’s political style finds counterparts in other multiethnic countries where racism similarly shapes the structures of power.
Consider Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, another corrupt and manipulative politician. Netanyahu has held on to power by denigrating Israeli Arabs and denying the most basic justice to Palestinians.
White evangelicals in the US have held a deep kinship with the Israeli right, and Trump and Netanyahu have shared the same exclusionary politics.
Consider, too, Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, widely known as the “Trump of the Tropics.” Here, too, the connection with Trump is more than just style and temperament.
US white evangelical groups saw in Bolsonaro one of their own and worked assiduously to help him win. Bolsonaro now governs by attacking Afro-Brazilian culture and Brazil’s indigenous populations.
There is also Trump’s close relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Some claim that Putin has kompromat (compromising material) on Trump. Others see shared financial interests.
Another part of the story is obvious political affinity. A major ingredient of Putin’s success has been to remind ethnic Russians that they are the true leaders of Russia’s multiethnic society. Putin’s political embrace of Russian Orthodoxy mirrors Trump’s political embrace of white evangelicalism.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been another fulsome admirer of Trump, and the two lavished praise on each other during Trump’s visit to India last year. Modi’s base includes far-right Hindu nationalists who preach hate against India’s Muslim-minority population.
The Modi government’s military occupation of Muslim-majority Kashmir in 2019 generated little international concern, but offers a stark example of violent ethnic repression for domestic political gain.
Alas, ethnic chauvinism can be found in almost every multiethnic society. It is no accident that Trump actually praised China’s repression of the mainly Muslim Uighur population in Xinjiang. Likewise, Myanmar’s violent expulsion of the Muslim Rohingya population elicited mainly silence from the Trump administration.
If there is one constant in racist politics worldwide, it is this near-universal persecution of indigenous populations. Around the world, indigenous peoples have been robbed of their lands, forced into servitude, brutally killed and pushed into poverty by late-arriving settlers.
Yet this dispossession was never enough for the conquerors. In addition to the infliction of harm, and even genocide, the conquerors also blamed the indigenous peoples for their woes, maligning them as lazy, untrustworthy and dangerous as their lands were being stolen.
There is also good news. Trump’s defeat, and the overwhelming US public opprobrium that met the Capitol insurrectionists, holds the lesson that people can move beyond their worst instincts, fears and biases. White racists in the US are losing their grip on power, and they know it. The times really are changing. The American people voted Trump out of power.
HATE-MONGERS
The day before the insurrection, Georgia’s voters elected an African-American and a Jew as US senators — both firsts for the state that came at the expense of two pro-Trump incumbents.
Trump’s departure is therefore an opportunity for a new beginning, not only in the deeply wounded US society, but in multiethnic divided societies everywhere. There is no excuse anywhere to govern by racial hatred and ethnic chauvinism. In the post-Trump era, governments everywhere should expel the hate-mongers.
The world should also look back in history to help move forward. In 1948, in the shadow of the atrocities of World War II, all member states of the new UN adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
This magnificent declaration is based on the principle of universal human dignity, “without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.”
The Universal Declaration must be our lodestar. Its 75th anniversary in 2023 is approaching, and we have the means to say no to the haters, the demagogues and the dividers.
Trump left the US in a shambles, with 400,000 dead from COVID-19, asking his followers to dispense with masks. Now that the US has instead dispensed with Trump, it can get on with the task of ending the pandemic and healing its deeply divided societies.
Jeffrey Sachs, a professor of sustainable development and a professor of health policy and management at Columbia University, is director of Columbia’s Center for Sustainable Development and the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs