When an airliner carrying passengers from the UK arrived in Taiwan on Dec. 27, some critics unreasonably compared it with last year’s chartered flights from Wuhan, China. This is a fine example of forgetting the pain once the wound is healed. Perhaps these people need to be reminded of a few things.
First, does the UK compare with China in terms of their transparency of information? For example, the UK warned other countries as soon as it discovered a new variant of COVID-19, although it only knew that the variant had a relatively high basic reproductive number (R0 value, the average number of other people who get infected by each infected person), while other information had not yet been confirmed. This stands in contrast with China, where a pneumonia-causing virus was circulating for two months, but China only conceded that this was the case when it was forced to do so.
Second, in February last year, when there was a worldwide shortage of personal protective equipment, one could only buy two masks at a time in Taiwan and they were often sold out everywhere. Today, who does not have a stock of two or three boxes of masks at home? In February, medical alcohol was also in short supply, but now supermarkets sell a bottle of alcohol for just NT$79. A box of double-debossed masks costs just NT$199 and they even come in pink.
The third and most important point is that at the beginning, the world was facing a completely unknown virus. For example, no one was certain of its incubation period, clinical expressions, infectiousness, mortality rate or cycle threshold. No one knew how long a sick person would remain infectious or whether the virus spread through droplet transmission or, even more seriously, airborne transmission.
When Chinese ophthalmologist Li Wenliang (李文亮) revealed the breakout in Wuhan, even he thought it was a new outbreak of SARS. A research paper originally published on April 7 last year and republished by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in the July issue of Emerging Infectious Diseases found that the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, has a median R0 value of 5.7, which is not just higher than SARS, but even in the same league as poliomyelitis (R0 value 4.9) and smallpox (R0 value 5.2). However, the most recent information is that SARS-CoV-2 has an R0 value ranging from a little more than 1 to a little more than 3.
Tens of millions of pieces of data about COVID-19 were collected by the US CDC from around the world last year, and have been collated and clarified. For example, the virus does spread through droplet transmission, the incubation period rarely exceeds 10 days, and those who become ill, testing positive, are typically infectious for no more than 10 days.
Such revelations finally allowed Taiwanese to feel a little reassured, while confirming that the government’s strategy of a 14-day quarantine followed by a seven-day period of self-health management, as well as wearing a mask, is the most effective containment method.
However, these important pieces of information were unknown back in February.
Over the past six months, Taiwan has only had one case of local transmission [until yesterday], which was completely traceable. This is not just good luck; it is because Taiwanese have been extra cautious from the very beginning.
Despite going partly by guesswork, Taiwan did the right thing in some key aspects. That is how Taiwanese achieved today’s disease prevention results, which have won the world’s admiration.
Nonetheless, some people are using newly discovered information to question why Taiwan could not relax its restrictions 10 months ago. This is a ridiculous attitude to take. The truth is that Taiwan’s disease prevention team is clearly the world’s busiest.
It has persevered in the face of one challenge after another, yet it must still deal with verbal assaults from pundits who care little for the facts, as well as the insincerity of the “soy paste pot culture.” It really is a shame to behold.
Liu Ying is a physician.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.