Chinese social media users took great delight in the scenes of rioters breaking into the US Capitol building on Wednesday, which they were allowed to see. It is too bad that they are unlikely to have been able to read or hear about another incident earlier that day, Hong Kong Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma’s (馬道立) final appearance on the bench, when he delivered a second strong defense of the rule of law and judicial independence in the territory in as many days.
Ma’s words carried even more resonance as they came just hours after more than 1,000 police officers were deployed across Hong Kong to arrest 53 democracy advocates, former lawmakers and academics for contravening the National Security Law by organizing an unofficial primary in July last year to nominate opposition candidates for the Legislative Council elections in September, which were later postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
While Ma’s remarks were targeted at the pro-Beijing politicians, media and other forces in the territory — as well as those in China’s nomenklatura — who have been pushing for “reforming” Hong Kong’s judiciary, they should also be heeded by those in the US who filed a series of baseless lawsuits seeking to overturn the results of the US presidential election, as well as those calling for legislative changes to back such demands.
His words should also be taken to heart by people in many nations, including those in Taiwan, who have all too often in recent years argued, as Tam Yiu-chung (譚耀宗), Hong Kong’s sole delegate to the National People’s Congress Standing Committee, did last summer, that courts should be in the business of making “down-to-earth” rulings that suit the prevailing situation in society.
At a news conference on Tuesday, Ma said: “It’s not particularly satisfactory if there’s a call for reforms simply on the basis of a result one doesn’t like. It is certainly not a good starting point or acceptable to say: ‘I want reforms to ensure that I will always get the result which I want.’”
He went even further the next day, stressing three points: one, that the rule of law is about recognizing and enforcing human rights and fundamental freedoms; two, that it is not just about being conducive to business and investment, or only about law and order; and, three, that the concept of an independent judiciary is not related to politics.
Judicial independence means “the responsibility and duty imposed on the courts to adjudicate on the law and legal disputes fairly, evenly and strictly in accordance with legal principle and the spirit of the law,” Ma said during an hour-long ceremony at the Court of Final Appeal to an audience of lawyers, judges and government officials, including Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥).
It must have made for a few uncomfortable moments for Lam, who has repeatedly said that the legislation would not undermine the territory’s autonomy or its judiciary, or be retroactive, despite Beijing’s obvious intentions to the contrary.
Ma’s comments were similar to the judicial rebuffs delivered over the past two months to Republicans in several US states who sought to overturn election results based on claims of improprieties with mail-in ballots or ballot verification and counting. As a Washington Post article early last month, headlined “The Last Wall,” pointed out, there had been a “remarkable show of near-unanimity” among 86 judges across the US, from low-level state courts to the US Supreme Court, some elected, others appointed by Democrats and Republicans, that “comprehensively dismantled the arguments advanced by [US President Donald] Trump in his efforts to get the courts to subvert [US president-elect Joe] Biden’s victory.”
Since that article was published, even more judges joined the list of 86, upholding the rule of law and judicial independence.
Chinese citizens can only fantasize about having such a judiciary, which is why Beijing is working so hard to stamp it out in Hong Kong.
Americans and Taiwanese should be proud they live in nations where such “last walls” exist, even if they do not always agree with the verdicts.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry