About this time four years ago, the climate community was in shock. Just when the world seemed to be on the cusp of pursuing serious measures to fight climate change, voters in the US elected a president who would try to reverse all of the country’s previous climate achievements, causing immeasurable damage. We are now finally approaching the end of that bleak era.
Over the past four years, many outside the US federal government have continued to make progress against climate change. State and city governments, major institutions, and businesses large and small ignored the US president’s backward-looking rhetoric and continued working toward a sustainable future. Outside the US, many other countries strengthened their climate commitments and instituted concrete action plans.
The EU is leading the way. Under President Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission has introduced a European Green Deal to achieve climate neutrality (net-zero carbon dioxide emissions) by 2050.
In a speech to the UN on Sept. 22, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) announced a similar goal for China, which is now committed to being “carbon neutral” by 2060. Given China’s starting position, this target is arguably even more ambitious than the EU’s.
In the US, president-elect Joe Biden has been promoting a “Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice,” which aims for 100 percent clean energy and net-zero emissions no later than 2050.
With control of the US Senate dependent on two run-off elections in Georgia next month, it is not clear how much of Biden’s plan would be enacted.
However, either way, the new administration in Washington would take action to reduce emissions wherever it can.
Japan’s new Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga has also committed his country to achieving climate neutrality by 2050, and South Korea followed suit just days later.
All over the world, climate action is near the top of the policy agenda. Now, we must find a way to move forward together to tackle this enormous challenge.
With Biden on his way to the White House, the US, the EU, and China have an historic opportunity to collaborate in ways that are both effective and mutually beneficial. Strategies to reduce overall emissions in each of these three critical jurisdictions would accelerate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis in the near term and drive longer-term growth through a global clean-energy transition.
Coordinated action on this front would offer hope not just for climate stability, but also for international relations more generally. As the world’s three largest industrial powers, the US, Europe and China are grappling with fundamental questions of coexistence across a wide range of issues, including trade relations, technology, geopolitical ambitions, human rights, security and the scope of the free market.
Yet by issuing similar climate proclamations, Biden, Von der Leyen and Xi have implicitly acknowledged their common ground. The next step is to embrace this domain of agreement to launch a summit process through which more contentious issues can eventually be addressed.
With almost a year to go before the UN Climate Conference in Glasgow, Scotland, these three leaders should start preparing the ground for meaningful multilateral action.
In doing so, each party can capitalize on promising advances over the past few decades. Technologies that were recently marginal are now standard features of the emerging 21st-century energy system. The dramatic decline in the cost of solar and wind energy has allowed these technologies to be deployed far and wide, and battery storage systems and electric vehicles are also experiencing rapid uptake.
Moreover, digital technologies are increasingly being used to connect all of the decentralized components needed for a climate-neutral economy.
There are many more cutting-edge technologies on the horizon, including highly efficient solar cells, reduced-cost geothermal energy, floating offshore wind farms and green hydrogen. These innovations would only add to the momentum of the clean-energy revolution.
Investors have taken note and many major companies are racing to stay ahead of the curve.
However, while recent private-sector commitments are promising, we can do even better. One of the most difficult, but promising tasks in the coming years would be to unite different areas of innovation so that we can rapidly scale up deployment of “green” technologies.
Fortunately, because this effort is to be labor-intensive, it can become a major source of jobs and new opportunities for economic development.
Although the direction the world is taking is clear, whether we will move as quickly as the climate crisis demands is not. We have all seen headlines about the disturbing developments in the arctic and Antarctic; as the planet heats up, melting polar ice and glaciers, sea levels are rising, and dangerous tipping points have come into view. The devastating wildfires in the western US and Australia in the past few years are merely a preview of what awaits us. More frequent and severe floods, droughts, hurricanes and other extreme weather will become the new normal if we maintain the “status quo.”
Hope lies with resolute and persistent collective action. By accelerating the clean-energy transition, we would not only avoid the most catastrophic consequences of climate change. We would also benefit from cleaner air and water, better jobs, more secure and resilient communities, and stronger economies long into the future.
In a world beset by crises and uncertainty, it is critical that we seize opportunities for concerted action when they arise. We are now living through one of those moments. Making the most of it would require skilled leadership, backed by a growing community of activists, scientists, entrepreneurs and policymakers who are committed to meaningful climate action. Together, we can navigate the path to a better future for all.
Jules Kortenhorst is CEO of the Rocky Mountain Institute. Andreas Kuhlmann is CEO of the German Energy Agency and founder of the Start Up Energy Transition initiative.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo delivered a very short, succinct and accurate speech in regards to the US relationship with Taiwan in November last year. This information has again angered Beijing, which has stated that the existence of a free and independent Taiwan will not be tolerated. Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin (汪文斌) has said Pompeo’s language is interfering with the sovereignty of China. Pompeo was stating the facts. Taiwan has never been a part of the People’s Republic of China or the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), therefore it is not a territory of China. The
Where is the world’s disposition today vis-a-vis the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)? Is it similar to that in Munich, September 1938 when Europe’s powers appeased Adolf Hitler over the “Sudetenland,” despite existing treaty commitments? In other words, analogous to the failure to recognize the PRC’s aggressive intent and to mobilize in response to serial CCP outrages, e.g., Tiananmen and South China Sea; suppression of Hong Kong in violation of a treaty agreement; the internment and genocide of the Uighurs, and its complicity in the death of nearly 3 million people globally via its Wuhan Coronavirus. Do these “passes” now amount to
The EU on Wednesday cohosted a Global Cooperation and Training Framework workshop with Taiwan and the US. They discussed the restructuring of the global supply chain and joint financing of small and medium-sized enterprises. This was the first time the EU, represented by European Economic and Trade Office in Taiwan Director Filip Grzegorzewski, cohosted such an event. Launched in 2015, the framework aims to help bring Taiwan’s expertise to the global stage. Essentially, it was designed to find ways to include Taiwan in global efforts, as it remains excluded from international organizations. With Taiwan’s successful containment of COVID-19 and its vital role
Foreigners who learn Mandarin mainly do so for one of two reasons — to do business in China, or to understand issues related to China. For those aiming to do business, it is sensible to learn the language in China. If it is to understand, learning in Taiwan is a good option, because such people are likely to be involved in national security or the military of their home countries. Taiwan is a much safer learning environment compared with China, and it is an information hub for issues related to China. There is access in Taiwan to the truth about the Chinese