With public awareness of what constitutes sexual harassment growing and discussion about it increasing amid a rise in incidents, it is unfortunate that some universities do not know how to protect people from it or respond with sensitivity toward the victims.
Social media have become a place for victims to speak out, and people in power have greater difficulty hiding experiences of sexual harassment, especially with the media also ready to pounce on the stories.
For example, the boycott of Fu Wan Chocolate over alleged sexual harassment involving a former company president grew out of an Internet post by the alleged victim that went viral.
The latest incident involves a female university student in New Taipei City, who fell asleep in the university library when a male student allegedly masturbated next to her and ejaculated on her jacket. She reported the incident to the police and the suspect was arrested.
While the university’s gender equity committee reportedly said that it would look into the incident, it repeatedly referred to it as a “prank,” and said that the male student was “naughty” and “immature,” and did “not know better.”
Such terms are typically used to excuse improper behavior by young children or teenagers, but he is in his fourth year at university, and it is egregious that the terms would be applied in such a case.
When the victim asked that the perpetrator be expelled, the university said that expulsion only happens in the case of sexual assault. Even if that is the case, it is inappropriate and insensitive to say that to someone who just went through such an ordeal.
The university has denied that a committee member made those remarks, writing on Facebook that it has launched an investigation and is waiting for a report to determine the fate of the perpetrator.
However, Internet users wrote a flood of angry comments to the post, causing the university to shut down the Facebook page.
In September last year, a man who sexually harassed a woman at a train station in a similar fashion was convicted of public indecency and sentenced to 50 days in jail.
The perpetrator in the latest incident is facing several criminal charges, further showing that it was not a prank.
After learning about the case, a former student at the university said that when she complained several years ago to the university about being sexually harassed during a school-arranged internship, she was told that there was nothing the university could do unless she was sexually assaulted.
No department wanted to take responsibility and, eventually, the incident was reportedly swept under the rug.
It remains to be seen how the university handles the latest case — especially after the widespread reporting of such incidents.
Regardless of who said what, the case shows that Internet users generally side with victims. Companies and universities need to exercise caution and show sensitivity, and not think that they can make the incidents disappear.
Meanwhile, a cram school teacher in Taipei has been accused of bringing male masturbation toys to a Christmas party for high-school students.
In an absurd twist, the school vehemently denied that the action was inappropriate, saying that all the students at the party were male and the toys were used to liven up the atmosphere.
How different is that from a teacher bringing dildos to a party for female high-school students? This is simply disturbing and misguided, and needs to be seriously investigated.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press