Peace deals that entrench injustice, punish the weak, and are propelled by greed, blackmail and weapons sales have precious little to do with peace — and are unlikely to endure. Yet the Middle East in the past few months witnessed a spate of such dodgy deals.
All concern Israel and all were hastily cobbled together by the White House. As his curtailed presidency grinds to an unlamented close, US President Donald Trump appears engaged in a frantic foreign policy fire sale.
Peace is always a welcome prospect — but never at any price. Trump’s horse-trading on Israel’s behalf has made a cruel mockery of Palestinian rights.
Illustration: Tania Chou
By agreeing to normalize relations with Israel, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain broke with the 2002 Arab peace plan that makes recognition conditional on the creation of a viable, independent Palestinian state.
The deal was sweetened with offers of advanced US weapons and money-spinning business, and trade opportunities.
Israel’s new chums are nothing to be proud of.
Both countries are autocratic monarchies. Both have a history of jailing and abusing those who disagree with them. Women’s rights, and the rights of migrant workers, are disregarded.
Neither regime could be counted on in the event of war between Israel and their mutual enemy, Iran — part of the deal’s supposed raison d’etre. The UAE’s military is mostly famous for bombing civilians in Yemen and Libya.
Trump in October also bullied Sudan into embracing Israel in return for lifting a veto on desperately needed assistance from the World Bank and the IMF. Khartoum first had to pay US$335 million that the US said it owed to US victims of terrorism. Sudan has also been taken off the US list of state sponsors of terrorism.
This is hardly generous. Washington should have done all this for free last year, after the dictorship of then-Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir was overthrown.
Trump’s latest “peace in our time” scam echoes the UAE-Bahrain “stab in the back” experienced by the Palestinians.
To secure Morocco’s formal recognition of Israel this month, he reneged on a decades-old US commitment to a UN-supervised independence referendum in disputed, mostly Moroccan-occupied Western Sahara — and unconditionally recognized Rabat’s sovereignty over the entire area.
In doing so, Trump ignored UN resolutions, and failed to consult Sahrawis, neighboring Algeria and Mauritania, the African Union (AU) or the EU.
The immediate, predictable reaction of the Polisario Front, the Western Sahara independence movement that proclaimed the AU-backed Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic in 1976, was to declare a resumption of hostilities with Morocco, ending a 29-year ceasefire.
Like the Palestinians, Sahrawis trusted the international community’s promises. Like them, they have been betrayed. Few in the wider world appear to have even noticed.
Trump did not need to offer these inducements to Morocco, which has done little to deserve them. Backed by France, it has persistently thwarted UN attempts to organize a credible referendum.
In another echo of the West Bank, it encouraged northern settlers to move to Western Sahara, changing the region’s demographic and ethnic profile.
Like Palestinians in Lebanon, tens of thousands of Sahrawi refugees remain in camps in Algeria 45 years after Spanish colonial rule ended and Morocco moved in. Nor did Israel have any great need of Morocco’s diplomatic endorsement, having long maintained back-channels to Rabat.
Trump forced through this shoddy stitch-up for the purposes of self-glorification, hoping to compensate for four years of foreign policy failures and further bolster his supposedly pan-Arab, anti-Iran alliance.
Not everyone in Washington is looking the other way. In an excoriating critique, John Bolton, Trump’s sacked national security adviser, last week said that his old boss had thrown the Sahrawi people “under the bus.”
Trump’s rash decision risked reigniting a frozen conflict in a combustible region on the edge of the Sahel that is vulnerable to militant influence. Fighting has not yet resumed, but might do so imminently, Bolton said.
“This is what happens when dilettantes handle US diplomacy, and it is sadly typical of Trump’s nakedly transactional approach,” Bolton said.
“To him, everything is a potential deal, viewed in very narrow terms through the attention span of a fruit fly,” he said. “Fully weighing all the merits and equities in complex international scenarios is not his style. Fortunately, Trump made no nuclear deal with North Korea or Iran. One can only imagine what he might have given away.”
Bolton urged US president-elect Joe Biden to reverse course and swiftly rescind US recognition of Moroccan sovereignty in Western Sahara.
Such a correction would matter little to Israel and would expose the “underlying reason for the [Moroccan] occupation — which is that it wants control over possible substantial mineral resources,” he said.
A US volte-face would certainly gain regional approval. Algeria, the Polisario Front’s main backer, said that the US move had “no legal effect.”
Spain and the EU are calling for resumed, UN-supervised talks, even though the process has been stuck in the sand for years.
Palestinian officials have been scathing.
“Any Arab retreat [from the 2002 peace plan] is unacceptable and increases Israel’s belligerence and its denial of the Palestinian people’s rights,” Palestinian People’s Party General-Secretary Bassam al-Salhi said.
Yet with the damage done, Trump has already moved on. His eye is now fixed on the biggest prize of all: a Saudi Arabia-Israel peace deal.
This would be welcome if it were done for the right reasons and honored previous undertakings.
Given Trump’s record, that is too much to hope for. Saudi leaders, who are split on the issue, are so far publicly refusing his blandishments.
However, he will keep trying. For Trump, bringing Israel and Saudi Arabia together, on what he personally calculates to be politically and financially advantageous terms, would be his dodgy “deal of the century” — regardless of what promises are broken or who gets hurt.
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known affectionately as “Big S,” recently passed away from pneumonia caused by the flu. The Mandarin word for the flu — which translates to “epidemic cold” in English — is misleading. Although the flu tends to spread rapidly and shares similar symptoms with the common cold, its name easily leads people to underestimate its dangers and delay seeking medical treatment. The flu is an acute viral respiratory illness, and there are vaccines to prevent its spread and strengthen immunity. This being the case, the Mandarin word for “influenza” used in Taiwan should be renamed from the misleading