British Prime Minister Boris Johnson would be under even greater pressure to strike a Brexit deal with Brussels when US president-elect Joe Biden enters the White House, senior Conservatives and diplomats said on Saturday, amid fears that a no-deal outcome could seriously threaten relations with a new Democratic administration.
The British Foreign Office and No. 10 are urgently trying to assess the implications for British foreign policy of a Biden presidency, including in areas such as Brexit, climate change, the Middle East, China and NATO.
However, after a telephone call on Saturday between Johnson and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen ended with Downing Street saying “significant differences remain in a number of areas,” fears were growing that both sides could be slipping toward no deal.
Pro-EU Conservatives and diplomats are concerned that a no-deal outcome would cause early and serious tension between London and Washington, and put the special relationship at risk, given Biden’s stated opposition to Brexit, support for European integration and support for the Good Friday Agreement.
Biden, who has Irish ancestry, has made it clear that there will be no agreement on a post-Brexit UK-US trade deal if a no-deal outcome threatens the Good Friday agreement that he holds dear.
His concerns over the threat to the agreement in the event of a no-deal Brexit reached new heights after Johnson forced through the internal market bill. Many saw the move as putting Brexit above the interests of peace in Ireland.
Senior Conservatives and other senior pro-EU figures in Whitehall also said that a UK-US trade deal after Brexit could be less likely under Biden than it would have been under Trump.
Senior diplomats believe that Biden might even prioritize a US-EU trade deal over one with the UK as he tries to repair relations with the 27-nation bloc that were badly damaged by the actions of US President Donald Trump.
On Saturday night, one of Johnson’s former Cabinet colleagues, Baroness Nicky Morgan, said that while in many respects Biden could prove a better ally than Trump in areas of British foreign policy, such as NATO, the Middle East and climate change, the thorny matter of Brexit would have to be dealt with very carefully.
Taking into account Biden’s warnings on Northern Irish peace, Morgan said: “I think the PM will not want the first conversation he has with Biden to be about Northern Ireland, Brexit and no deal. Getting a deal will make that conversation much easier.”
Former Cabinet minister Damian Green added: “A deal is better than a no deal for all sorts of reasons, but a Biden White House would be much more receptive to a UK-US deal if we already had one with the EU.”
Brussels and No. 10 on Saturday made it clear that Brexit negotiations remained stuck following the call between Von der Leyen and Johnson before a decisive week of talks, even as tentative signs emerged of agreement around a five-year transition period on fishing rights.
Von der Leyen and Johnson highlighted in their post-call statements the contentious issues of EU access to British waters and agreement on future rules to ensure fair competition.
Von der Leyen wrote on Twitter that “some progress has been made, but large differences remain” with just more than a week remaining before parliamentary ratification on a trade and security deal will need to begin.
A statement from Downing Street emphasized the need to “redouble efforts” when the two sides, led by European Chief Negotiator for the UK Exiting the EU Michel Barnier and his British counterpart, David Frost, re-engaged yesterday.
“The prime minister set out that, while some progress had been made in recent discussions, significant differences remain in a number of areas, including the so-called level playing field and fish,” a Downing Street spokesman said following Saturday’s call.
“The prime minister and president agreed that their negotiating teams would continue talks in London next week, beginning on Monday, in order to redouble efforts to reach a deal,” he said.
The negotiations are entering a decisive phase.
However, Barnier last week privately warned that the talks were not on a “trajectory” for a deal, telling members of the European Parliament that the coming week offered the last opportunity for common ground to be found.
However, it is understood that there are tentative signs of agreement on a five-year transition period on fisheries.
Barnier has told diplomats that the “gap” on fishing is big regarding quotas and that “access to the 6-12 [nautical] mile [11.1km to 22.2km] fishing zone” remains a sticking point for France and Ireland, who point to their fishing fleets operating in those stretch of seas for centuries.
One source said the EU was seeking to help Johnson to overcome his political problems at home to get the deal over the line, but that the gaps in terms of quotas remained too big as yet for Brussels to be able to start selling the deal to the member states.
In Brussels, the greatest concern is the lack of progress on the issues of standards and domestic subsidies, or state aid.
The EU has proposed high-level principles on state subsidies to which both sides would agree. The UK would also establish an independent competition authority and there would be a dispute settlement mechanism, with both sides able to take swift retaliatory action during an arbitration period if there was a clear breach of the rules.
However, Downing Street has suggested that the threshold for unilateral action needs to be a clear impact on trade from a subsidy rather than a mere risk.
Meanwhile on the issue of standards, the UK has agreed to non-regression from current environmental, labor and social regulations, but there has been a clash over how the two sides will develop their laws over time.
“We are nowhere,” one source said.
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
US president-elect Donald Trump is inheriting from President Joe Biden a challenging situation for American policy in the Indo-Pacific region, with an expansionist China on the march and threatening to incorporate Taiwan, by force if necessary. US policy choices have become increasingly difficult, in part because Biden’s policy of engagement with China, including investing in personal diplomacy with President Xi Jinping (習近平), has not only yielded little but also allowed the Chinese military to gain a stronger footing in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. In Xi’s Nov. 16 Lima meeting with a diminished Biden, the Chinese strongman signaled little
On Tuesday, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) issued a statement criticizing Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a student from Shanghai’s Fudan University, saying she had offended the sensibilities of Taiwanese. It also called for the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation — established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — which had organized the tour group, to remind group members to be careful with their statements. Song, during a visit to a baseball stadium in Taichung, said that the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team (中國台北隊) ... we wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
RSS