British Prime Minister Boris Johnson would be under even greater pressure to strike a Brexit deal with Brussels when US president-elect Joe Biden enters the White House, senior Conservatives and diplomats said on Saturday, amid fears that a no-deal outcome could seriously threaten relations with a new Democratic administration.
The British Foreign Office and No. 10 are urgently trying to assess the implications for British foreign policy of a Biden presidency, including in areas such as Brexit, climate change, the Middle East, China and NATO.
However, after a telephone call on Saturday between Johnson and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen ended with Downing Street saying “significant differences remain in a number of areas,” fears were growing that both sides could be slipping toward no deal.
Pro-EU Conservatives and diplomats are concerned that a no-deal outcome would cause early and serious tension between London and Washington, and put the special relationship at risk, given Biden’s stated opposition to Brexit, support for European integration and support for the Good Friday Agreement.
Biden, who has Irish ancestry, has made it clear that there will be no agreement on a post-Brexit UK-US trade deal if a no-deal outcome threatens the Good Friday agreement that he holds dear.
His concerns over the threat to the agreement in the event of a no-deal Brexit reached new heights after Johnson forced through the internal market bill. Many saw the move as putting Brexit above the interests of peace in Ireland.
Senior Conservatives and other senior pro-EU figures in Whitehall also said that a UK-US trade deal after Brexit could be less likely under Biden than it would have been under Trump.
Senior diplomats believe that Biden might even prioritize a US-EU trade deal over one with the UK as he tries to repair relations with the 27-nation bloc that were badly damaged by the actions of US President Donald Trump.
On Saturday night, one of Johnson’s former Cabinet colleagues, Baroness Nicky Morgan, said that while in many respects Biden could prove a better ally than Trump in areas of British foreign policy, such as NATO, the Middle East and climate change, the thorny matter of Brexit would have to be dealt with very carefully.
Taking into account Biden’s warnings on Northern Irish peace, Morgan said: “I think the PM will not want the first conversation he has with Biden to be about Northern Ireland, Brexit and no deal. Getting a deal will make that conversation much easier.”
Former Cabinet minister Damian Green added: “A deal is better than a no deal for all sorts of reasons, but a Biden White House would be much more receptive to a UK-US deal if we already had one with the EU.”
Brussels and No. 10 on Saturday made it clear that Brexit negotiations remained stuck following the call between Von der Leyen and Johnson before a decisive week of talks, even as tentative signs emerged of agreement around a five-year transition period on fishing rights.
Von der Leyen and Johnson highlighted in their post-call statements the contentious issues of EU access to British waters and agreement on future rules to ensure fair competition.
Von der Leyen wrote on Twitter that “some progress has been made, but large differences remain” with just more than a week remaining before parliamentary ratification on a trade and security deal will need to begin.
A statement from Downing Street emphasized the need to “redouble efforts” when the two sides, led by European Chief Negotiator for the UK Exiting the EU Michel Barnier and his British counterpart, David Frost, re-engaged yesterday.
“The prime minister set out that, while some progress had been made in recent discussions, significant differences remain in a number of areas, including the so-called level playing field and fish,” a Downing Street spokesman said following Saturday’s call.
“The prime minister and president agreed that their negotiating teams would continue talks in London next week, beginning on Monday, in order to redouble efforts to reach a deal,” he said.
The negotiations are entering a decisive phase.
However, Barnier last week privately warned that the talks were not on a “trajectory” for a deal, telling members of the European Parliament that the coming week offered the last opportunity for common ground to be found.
However, it is understood that there are tentative signs of agreement on a five-year transition period on fisheries.
Barnier has told diplomats that the “gap” on fishing is big regarding quotas and that “access to the 6-12 [nautical] mile [11.1km to 22.2km] fishing zone” remains a sticking point for France and Ireland, who point to their fishing fleets operating in those stretch of seas for centuries.
One source said the EU was seeking to help Johnson to overcome his political problems at home to get the deal over the line, but that the gaps in terms of quotas remained too big as yet for Brussels to be able to start selling the deal to the member states.
In Brussels, the greatest concern is the lack of progress on the issues of standards and domestic subsidies, or state aid.
The EU has proposed high-level principles on state subsidies to which both sides would agree. The UK would also establish an independent competition authority and there would be a dispute settlement mechanism, with both sides able to take swift retaliatory action during an arbitration period if there was a clear breach of the rules.
However, Downing Street has suggested that the threshold for unilateral action needs to be a clear impact on trade from a subsidy rather than a mere risk.
Meanwhile on the issue of standards, the UK has agreed to non-regression from current environmental, labor and social regulations, but there has been a clash over how the two sides will develop their laws over time.
“We are nowhere,” one source said.
I think it is fair to say there is a widespread sigh of relief among many Americans — particularly those of us focused on foreign policy — that the chaotic and unpredictable Trump years will soon be over. Mr. Trump brought little real knowledge or experience to his foreign policy, and it showed. He also — in my humble opinion — did not err on the side of expertise in his choice of top foreign policy officials. Nor was he particularly open to listening to advice. All in all a poor set of traits for overseeing the complex foreign policy
After more than eight years of talks, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was signed on Nov. 15, combining the individual free-trade agreements signed between ASEAN member states on the one hand, and China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand on the other. Under the leadership of ASEAN and China, most observers did not expect the RCEP to provide a high degree of openness, and the announced agreement lives up to these expectations, containing few surprises. All products covered by the RCEP tariff reductions are agricultural and industrial products, but reductions of agricultural product tariffs are very limited, for example covering
While the nation grapples with its falling birthrate, it is also imperative to address how parents are raising their children. The phenomenon of “dinosaur parents” — who lash out at teachers, store staff or people on the street when confronted about their children misbehaving — has been an issue for a while, but there seems to be an uncomfortably high number of incidents making the news lately. On Saturday, a preschool teacher on an online forum wrote about a mother who often visited the school and screamed at the staff for various reasons — including her child being late to school
On Nov. 14, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) commented on the nation’s low birthrate, claiming that young people would surely have children if only they married first, and that the low marriage rate among young people is the cause of the rapid aging of Taiwan’s society. The Taipei City Government therefore proposed to offer subsidies to couples willing to marry. Ko’s comment stirred up a great deal of protest. As a sociology student, I would like to remind the mayor that his remarks not only decontextualized the population aging issue, but also oversimplified the low birthrate problem. First, a look at systemic