Misquoted
I was badly misquoted by your newspaper (“Ezra Vogel is on the wrong side of history,” Nov. 3, page 8).
I did say that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) said that the Taiwan issue cannot wait for future generations to decide. I do not agree with his view.
I agree with former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) that the issue should be solved by future generations.
I do think that Taiwan must deal with the issue seriously, for there are people in China who would like an excuse to use military means to bring Taiwan under their control.
I was in Taiwan recently and was impressed with the comfortable feeling of life there.
Ezra Vogel
Social sciences professor emeritus at Harvard University and former director of the Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies
Vogel’s words
On behalf of Global Views Monthly’s editorial division, I would like to call to your attention a recent article by Gerrit van der Wees (“Ezra Vogel is on the wrong side of history,” Nov. 3, page 8).
We understand that the piece was based on Vogel’s exclusive interview in the November issue of Global Views Monthly, but we strongly disagree with the content therein.
In particular, Global Views Monthly has always been committed to promoting peace, exchange and interaction across the Taiwan Strait.
We defend Taiwan’s sovereignty and are dedicated to our responsibilities as a media organization in being fair and objective without presuppositions or biases.
We thereby strongly protest Van der Wees’ article, accusing our magazine of being “pro-unification.”
In addition, the content of our interview with Vogel is fair and objective.
If the report is read in full, it is obvious that Vogel simply points out that the leadership across the Strait does not necessarily have a lot of patience with cross-strait issues, and once argued that “cross-strait issues will not be resolved by the next generation.”
This is far from a personal opinion of Vogel. It is but a gentle reminder to President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) that she should handle cross-strait issues carefully.
Van der Wees’ article exaggerated this one sentence and overinterpreted its meaning, baselessly criticizing Vogel for being “on the wrong side of history.”
We solemnly protest that the content of the interview has been misinterpreted and criticized without grounds.
Mary Yang
President, Global Views – Commonwealth Publishing Group
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Chinese Ministry of National Defense spokesman Wu Qian (吳謙) announced at a news conference that General Miao Hua (苗華) — director of the Political Work Department of the Central Military Commission — has been suspended from his duties pending an investigation of serious disciplinary breaches. Miao’s role within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) affects not only its loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but also ideological control. This reflects the PLA’s complex internal power struggles, as well as its long-existing structural problems. Since its establishment, the PLA has emphasized that “the party commands the gun,” and that the military is
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question: