For China, at least, US President Donald Trump is the gift that keeps on giving. His calamitous response to the COVID-19 pandemic has made China, whose government mishandled the initial outbreak in January, look like an exemplar of effective governance.
Moreover, Trump’s “America first” foreign policy has alienated traditional US allies, making it difficult to build a broad coalition to counter China.
To be sure, Trump has delivered painful blows to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). His trade and technology wars are demolishing US-China commercial relations, and his administration’s support for Taiwan has infuriated Chinese leaders.
However, as American voters prepare to head to the polls today, Trump seemingly has one more gift to give to Xi: an election meltdown.
In the run-up to this referendum on his presidency, Trump has repeatedly refused to commit unequivocally to accepting its outcome. He has used his presidential bully pulpit to try to delegitimize voting by mail, and even hinted that the US Supreme Court, which now has a 6-3 conservative majority following the US Senate’s Oct. 26 confirmation of Trump’s recent nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, would intervene and presumably deliver him a second term.
Opinion polls point to a clear victory for Trump’s Democratic challenger, former US vice president Joe Biden.
However, the presidential race is likely to tighten, and — even if Trump trails Biden in the overall popular vote — the outcome in the battleground states that would determine the winner in the Electoral College could be too close to call on election night. That would create an opening for Trump — and the Republican Party — to use their control of many levers of power to cling to the White House.
Although the nightmarish scenarios of a drawn-out post-election battle vary, any of them would irreparably damage the US’ democracy — to the delight of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
At the ideological level, a US election meltdown featuring bitter political clashes and endless litigation would be a propaganda bonanza for the CCP. Chinese leaders would point to the US’ political turmoil as a symptom of its terminal decline.
Trump’s incompetent management of the pandemic has already made the US an object of pity around the world. If he follows through on his threats to defy the will of US voters, the appeal of US democracy to people living under dictatorships, including in China, would be eviscerated.
If heavily armed far-right militia groups engage in large-scale voter intimidation and deadly clashes occur around the US on today, Chinese state-controlled media would gleefully beam such apocalyptic scenes into every Chinese household.
China could benefit even more if Trump emerges as the winner from a contested election — a likely prospect given the archaic and complex rules governing US presidential elections and the US Supreme Court’s potentially decisive role.
Although a second-term Trump administration would further tighten the military and technological screws around China, the continuation of his presidency would nonetheless be a boon to Xi’s regime.
For starters, a majority of Americans would regard Trump as an illegitimate president if he loses the popular vote — as now seems all but certain. Worse still, the country could be plunged into political civil war if he wins a second term through massive voter suppression, dubious political maneuvers by Republican-controlled legislatures in battleground states, such as Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Florida, partisan rulings by Trump-appointed judges and justices, and outright abuse of executive authority.
In the latest example of the latter, Trump has been calling on the US Department of Justice to investigate Biden and his son, Hunter, after a recent New York Post report prompted unsubstantiated allegations concerning Hunter Biden’s business dealings.
Although Democrats and Republicans regard China as the US’ most serious threat, one has to wonder how the US could effectively wage a new cold war against China while engulfed in a political civil war and led by a chief executive whom more than half the electorate regards as illegitimate.
At the very least, further intensification of partisan polarization would make it impossible for the US to rebuild its strength at home through catch-up investments in healthcare, education, scientific research, clean energy and infrastructure — all of which are urgently needed to sustain the country’s competitive advantage over China.
Internationally, a second-term Trump administration ushered in by non-democratic means would widen the gulf between the US and its traditional liberal democratic allies.
The continuation of Trump’s “America first” foreign policy would make it harder for the US to forge a broad anti-China coalition. With the erosion of US democracy likely to accelerate in a second Trump term, US diplomats would find it challenging to persuade other Western leaders that they should join the US’ autocratic strongman in an ideological crusade against China’s autocratic strongman.
Conventional wisdom holds that China’s leaders would prefer a Biden victory. Although China might then face a more unified West, a Biden administration would be more predictable, and open to cooperation on climate change and global public health.
However, the prospect of a US paralyzed by a crisis of political illegitimacy at home, and estranged from its allies abroad, might be even more attractive to the CCP.
Pei Minxin is a professor of government at Claremont McKenna College and a non-resident senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which