The wildfires, power outages and extreme weather that have ravaged California are setting the stage for a deepening economic crisis for an engine of US growth.
Blazes that scorched 1.66 million hectares, more than the past three years combined, have cost a record US$1.1 billion to battle.
S&P Global Ratings is warning that a new fund to help utilities cover liabilities might fall short.
California’s finances are already battered, with the COVID-19 pandemic busting a US$54 billion hole in the budget and hope fading for federal stimulus anytime soon.
Meanwhile, the state’s financial needs and strains with US President Donald Trump’s administration came to the fore on Friday last week after the White House denied a request for disaster aid for six blazes last month.
That decision was later reversed, California Governor Gavin Newsom said.
Taken together, the crises hammering the world’s fifth-biggest economy signal dismal possibilities about a recovery in a state suffering from rolling blackouts, smoke-filled air and apocalyptic skies.
The tacit trade-offs of living in California — tolerating higher costs and deepening inequality for a good quality of life and jobs — are being compromised by climate change, raising the scenario that residents and businesses will flee.
“Policy action in the next one to five years would be optimal, and probably sooner rather than later to move the economy in the right direction,” said Scott Anderson, Bank of the West’s head economist. “Otherwise we’re going to be facing a pretty bleak economic future here in California.”
For years, California has stood out as a symbol of economic success, with budget surpluses, record-low unemployment and booming industries from technology to entertainment.
The reversal from having the best recovery among states after the previous recession should serve as a “wake-up call” on how the effects of climate change are coming to fruition more quickly than once thought, Anderson said.
He said that the “one-two punch” of the fires and pandemic would push the state’s unemployment rate to 10.4 percent this year and 8.8 percent next year, higher than his US forecast of 8.4 percent and 6.9 percent respectively.
A trend of departing residents exceeding incoming people, typical for California during downturns, could be more prolonged than in the last recession and deal a blow to the state’s growth for decades, he said.
Frequent fires “may have inhabitants, insurers and government questioning the viability of living there and continually rebuilding,” said Patricia Healy, senior vice president of research at Cumberland Advisors.
The pandemic might trigger structural changes that could also fuel the exodus from the Golden State, such as the rise of remote work.
California, of course, has a long history of booms and busts, and it might yet emerge from the calamities with relative strength.
Credit-rating companies are still holding its rating to its highest in about two decades, because the state has built up reserves and overhauled practices to reduce political dysfunction.
For all the talk of people leaving, the median home price in August hit a record US$706,900, according to the California Association of Realtors.
Newsom, when asked earlier this month about the prospect of people leaving, said that the state has the ability to prosper well into the future, adding that a special edition of Time magazine in 1994 declared that California’s best days were behind it.
“This state six, seven months ago was dominating in so many different sectors,” he said at an Oct. 5 briefing. “Those core tenets of this state remain still as alive and enlivened as they ever have been despite some of these situational challenges that we face.”
Newsom, a Democrat, has made addressing climate change a key part of his administration’s goals.
Last month, he announced a target to ban new gas-fueled cars by 2035, a first among states, in a bid to mitigate carbon emissions, as well as a pledge to conserve 30 percent of state land and coastal water.
Yet these long-term initiatives face uncertainty and difficulties in implementation.
The mandate on cars is “unlikely to address near-term issues such as wildfire management, climate preparedness and electric power grid reliability,” Breckinridge Capital Advisors senior analyst Andrew Teras said.
The state needs “more immediate and proactive solutions,” he said.
California is spending about US$205 million in fire prevention and management programs this fiscal year, down from US$354 million in the previous year.
The decline was driven by the budget gap and inability of the administration and legislature to reach an agreement on how to spend cap-and-trade dollars, which boosted the funding last year, California Department of Finance spokesman H.D. Palmer said.
This year’s spending levels show that it is a priority given that other budget items were cut significantly, he said.
The US$1.1 billion in emergency spending by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection this fiscal year marks the first time that those costs have topped US$1 billion.
It is more than triple the original budget allocation of US$372.7 million, and is projected to grow to US$1.3 billion, the department wrote in a letter to legislators this week.
Barring significant action, California’s fire trends are only expected to intensify.
About 69 percent of the state’s economic output was exposed to fire risk in 2018, and that is estimated to rise to 71 percent over the next two decades, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco said.
So far, the state has boosted homeowner protections in insurance policies and emergency response plans for counties.
Legislators last year established a US$21 billion fund to help utilities such as PG&E and Edison International cover future liabilities when their equipment ignites disastrous blazes, a move that shored up market confidence.
That fund is likely to run out of money sooner than expected, given “the lack of sufficient rainfall, the dry environment and the apparent ease that relatively routine wildfires can develop into catastrophic wildfires,” S&P said last month.
Meanwhile, investors are assessing whether to buy securities sold by communities most at risk from climate change, which could lead to higher borrowing costs for them or even loss of access to the market.
Bond giant Pacific Investment Management demands greater compensation to hold such debt, said Sean McCarthy, head of municipal credit research at the company.
“It’s impossible to deny that these risks are not here now,” McCarthy said. “We’re going to see the collision of climate change with the recession.”
Liberal democracy and communist autocracy are at the initial stages of a historic battle. Taipei has chosen its side in this fight and has sought to frame “cross-strait relations” as an international issue, while Beijing says that Taiwan is an “internal issue” and a hangover from the Chinese Civil War. Taiwan’s status as a nation has new clarity and the international community is beginning to defend Taiwan’s democracy. The Washington Post has praised Taiwan’s diplomatic achievements and Australian Minister for Defence Peter Dutton has said that it would be inconceivable for Australia not to join Taiwan and the US in a conflict with
Thanks to the communist side of the Strait, awareness of the threats facing Taiwan is higher than at any time in the last 50 years. It’s an opportunity to educate the world about all the country has to offer, from public health and disaster relief to entrepreneurship and democratic governance. One of Taiwan’s greatest strengths — its semiconductor industry — however, is also potentially a terrible political liability. Taipei and friends of Taiwan should be careful how they wield it. The idea that China could shut down large swaths of the global economy with an attack on the center of 60%
At a time when China continues its assertive policy toward its neighboring countries, the regime of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Bhutan last month to resolve a longstanding border dispute. However, this is not the first time China and Bhutan have taken such efforts on this issue. Over the years, China has expanded its claim over territory in Bhutan. China claims over 764km2 of Bhutan’s territory, which includes Doklam, Sinchulung, Dramana and Shakhatoe in the northwestern region and the Pasamlung and Jakarlung Valleys in the central part of Bhutan. Although the two sides held
The world community has just seen an election victory with more than 90 percent of the vote under a dictatorial regime, but Dolqun Isa’s large election win was for a good reason. The World Uyghur Congress’ (WUC) 7th General Assembly was held in Prague, Czech Republic, from Nov. 12 to Nov. 14. The WUC was formed in exile to re-establish the independent state in East Turkestan — officially called Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region by China. At that meeting, Isa was re-elected to the presidency. He was the only candidate, and before the vote, another well-known Uighur advocate, Abduwali Ayup, said: “Are we living