China Central Television’s (CCTV) prime-time current affairs program Focus Talk this week aired a three-part series of “exposes” on alleged Taiwanese spies operating in China. The programs signal the opening of a new front in Beijing’s information war against Taiwan — and its own people.
In each case, the backstories concocted by the Chinese Communist Party were riddled with holes.
Sunday’s program focused on Morrison Lee (李孟居), a pro-independence native of Hsinchu County, who went missing on Aug. 20 last year after entering Shenzhen from Hong Kong. Lee had traveled to Hong Kong to support pro-democracy protests engulfing the territory. The program claimed that Lee is a township-level political adviser, inferring that he had links to the central government.
It provided no evidence to show which organization he was supposed to have been spying for, and during his filmed “confession,” Lee stated that he went to Hong Kong to distribute posters, because he “believed Taiwan’s government supported the movement.”
If this was supposed to be a smoking gun, it backfired. An excerpt from a Line app group conversation was also shown — hardly the communication method of choice for a trained spy.
According to the program’s own narrative, Lee made a spur of the moment decision to travel to Shenzhen, after hearing rumors that the People’s Armed Police were amassing at a sports stadium. He used his cellphone to film from a street near the stadium. Rather than being a professional spy, Lee appears to be just a rather naive individual, passionate about supporting Hong Kong protesters, and perhaps motivated by achieving notoriety within Taiwan’s pro-independence community by bringing back evidence of an armed police buildup.
Monday’s program featured Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽), with the evidence against him just as flimsy. During his filmed “confession,” Cheng claimed to be an aide to former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). The DPP has said that Cheng was never employed as Cho’s aide.
Another supposed piece of evidence was that Cheng had written a thesis on the Chinese Ministry of State Security while studying at Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Tuesday’s program featured Southern Taiwan Union of Cross-strait Relations Association chairman Tsai Chin-shu (蔡金樹) and retired National Taiwan Normal University professor Shih Cheng-ping (施正屏), both of whom went missing in 2018. The program claimed that they had been recruited by the Military Intelligence Bureau and National Security Bureau respectively, and were collecting “sensitive information.” It turns out that the sensitive information was publicly available: chicken feed.
To an outside observer, the propaganda campaign appears exceptionally clumsy. To a Chinese national without access to alternative news sources, the slickly produced “investigative journalism” format of the shows — which included interviews with pixelated security officials, a timeline of events and confiscated “evidence” — would seem credible.
In Lee’s case, the program seems designed to reinforce the idea that the unrest in Hong Kong is being fomented by Taiwanese provocateurs. The intention is to deflect criticism from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) handling of the territory, and to blacken Taiwan’s reputation.
As with all high-profile show trials in China, the programs also sent a clear warning to the domestic audience: Big Brother is all-seeing and all-knowing. Foreign spies, dissidents or Taiwanese sympathizers who dare to challenge the party’s paramountcy will be rooted out, publicly humiliated and left to rot in jail.
I think it is fair to say there is a widespread sigh of relief among many Americans — particularly those of us focused on foreign policy — that the chaotic and unpredictable Trump years will soon be over. Mr. Trump brought little real knowledge or experience to his foreign policy, and it showed. He also — in my humble opinion — did not err on the side of expertise in his choice of top foreign policy officials. Nor was he particularly open to listening to advice. All in all a poor set of traits for overseeing the complex foreign policy
After more than eight years of talks, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was signed on Nov. 15, combining the individual free-trade agreements signed between ASEAN member states on the one hand, and China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand on the other. Under the leadership of ASEAN and China, most observers did not expect the RCEP to provide a high degree of openness, and the announced agreement lives up to these expectations, containing few surprises. All products covered by the RCEP tariff reductions are agricultural and industrial products, but reductions of agricultural product tariffs are very limited, for example covering
While the nation grapples with its falling birthrate, it is also imperative to address how parents are raising their children. The phenomenon of “dinosaur parents” — who lash out at teachers, store staff or people on the street when confronted about their children misbehaving — has been an issue for a while, but there seems to be an uncomfortably high number of incidents making the news lately. On Saturday, a preschool teacher on an online forum wrote about a mother who often visited the school and screamed at the staff for various reasons — including her child being late to school
On Nov. 14, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) commented on the nation’s low birthrate, claiming that young people would surely have children if only they married first, and that the low marriage rate among young people is the cause of the rapid aging of Taiwan’s society. The Taipei City Government therefore proposed to offer subsidies to couples willing to marry. Ko’s comment stirred up a great deal of protest. As a sociology student, I would like to remind the mayor that his remarks not only decontextualized the population aging issue, but also oversimplified the low birthrate problem. First, a look at systemic