Something big is missing from Singapore’s picturesque and impeccably maintained highway linking downtown with Changi Airport: traffic.
The collapse in international travel has hit the city-state especially hard. Borders are shut to tourists and much of Singapore Airlines’ proud fleet is mothballed.
The idea of “flights to nowhere” had even been floated — effectively three-hour sight-seeing trips that would be bundled with staycations, shopping vouchers and limousine services.
Illustration: Mountain People
Now that has been scrapped for a plan to serve lunch aboard a grounded jumbo jet, a tour of the carrier’s training facilities and home delivery of first and business-class meals.
The ability to get in and out of a nation that takes about 30 minutes to traverse has been a big draw for the more than 1 million expatriates who live there.
Non-Singaporeans make up more than half of senior management roles in financial services.
The idea of being stuck flying in circles has many rethinking the informal bargain they have struck with the city they call home. A big part of that was the opportunity to work in a dynamic region, and experience diverse cultures and nations for a few years.
In return, Singapore got talent, industrialization and unique ties to global networks — vital for a country without a hinterland or natural resources.
Singapore’s modus operandi has been to make itself a base camp for global capitalism and the people who make it tick.
Former Singaporean prime minister Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀), the country’s first leader, laid out the welcome mat for multinational corporations: first for textiles, ship maintenance and petrochemicals, then for electronics, tourism and finance.
Changi Airport, top-notch public transport, a commitment to education and political stability made the city an appealing place to live. Relatively low tax rates only sweetened the deal.
Now Lee’s vision is running into the wall of COVID-19.
Singapore’s economy shrank a record 42.9 percent on an annualized basis in the second quarter from the previous three months, the deepest economic contraction since independence in 1965.
While data point to a bounce before the end of this year, the Singaporean government projects GDP to decline as much as 7 percent this year. This has sharply refocused public discourse. Opportunities for locals are the priority.
When companies do pare headcount, they are prevailed upon to keep Singaporeans at the core of their staffing.
Local press reports of legislative proceedings highlight references to a closely held list of firms on a watch list for their hiring practices. Banking and finance has fallen under heightened scrutiny.
The government of the ruling People’s Action Party, which lost seats in the parliament to the opposition in July’s general election, has tightened rules around employment visas for foreigners by raising minimum salaries twice this year.
Figures released last week showed that Singapore’s population fell slightly to 5.69 million in the year through June, the first drop since 2003. Work permit holders saw the largest decrease.
“We cannot sustain our openness if we do not provide enough opportunities for our own people,” Singaporean Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam told the Singapore Summit on Sept. 14. “It is not socially or politically sustainable. No society can be blindly open.”
Singapore is slowly cranking back to life after a strict lockdown. Throngs pulse through malls and hawker centers in suburbs of central Singapore. Subway trains are often full.
A pilot scheme for international executives to travel in the region — under a strictly controlled itinerary and subject to COVID-19 testing — is in the works. Children under the age of six are no longer required to wear a mask.
However, while the government is to allow more people into their offices, work from home remains the default. As long as that is the case, and the airport remains effectively a no-go zone, the more people realize that they do not need to be in Singapore to do their jobs. If teams across Asia can be managed by Zoom from the living room, then that living room could be anywhere.
This realization is crystallizing as the headlines splashed across Singapore’s major English-language newspaper, the Straits Times, openly debate the role foreigners play in the economy. Far from feeling welcome, expats now spend a lot of time looking over their shoulders. Employers are quietly urging them to avoid anything that might attract attention.
That has left many wondering whether uprooting their families has been worth it. You do not have to come to Singapore for the privilege of getting laid off. Schools fret about families packing up.
However, the regional office executives who are sent to Singapore need to be able to get into them.
The caricature of the European sipping a gin and tonic under a shady tree with rent and school fees taken care of, pampered by maids, is woefully out of date. Relatively few employers these days pick up the tab for housing and tuition. Relocation company staff say that the glory days of the expat packages ended with the global financial crisis.
With economic warfare raging between China and the US, and fashionable talk about the world dividing into rival blocs, is an Asian experience still the resume booster it once was? A gig here feels no more secure than one at home.
As a 10-year-old boy, the flight returning to Australia from a family vacation in Europe stopped at Singapore’s old Paya Lebar Air Base; I remember taking in the exotic night smells and marveling at the lights of hundreds of ships anchored just offshore.
As a newly minted college graduate, Singapore was my first stop on a cross-Asia trip. Living in Malaysia in the late 1990s, visits to the city-state were a balm for the haphazardness of Kuala Lumpur.
Last year, I returned to Singapore with a young family. We pay taxes, live in a middle-class neighborhood and, through our spending, try to support the economy. I hope the shatter zone of the COVID-19 pandemic is not the end of our journey together.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously he was executive editor of Bloomberg News for global economics, and has led teams in Asia, Europe and North America. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry