There are few moments in a nation’s history when one decision can heal the wrongs of the past, but in Greece there is mounting hope that a panel of three judges will do just that when at 11am tomorrow they deliver judgement on Golden Dawn, the neo-fascist party that took Europe by storm at the height of the country’s economic crisis.
“It will be good for the mental health of Greece,” said Dimitris Psarras, a left-wing writer whose dogged investigations into the ultra-nationalist force helped expose its sinister ideology and embrace of violence.
“We’re all looking towards three people to do what is right to protect democracy,” Psarras said.
Few verdicts have been as eagerly awaited. Even fewer have been as long in the making. The trial, the largest court hearing of Nazis since Nuremberg, began on April 20, 2015.
In proceedings both dramatic and banal, 68 people, including the party’s entire leadership, have faced charges of operating a criminal organization while at the same time posing as a political group. Police officers who allegedly supported the far-right party are among those in the dock.
The accusations have been vigorously denied. Only Giorgos Roupakias, a Golden Dawn operative, has confessed to the stabbing of Pavlos Fyssas, a popular anti-fascist rapper whose death triggered the group’s unraveling.
Lawmakers who represented the xenophobic bloc until its electoral defeat in July last year are accused of attempted murder, possession of weapons and employing violence to eradicate perceived enemies.
Like Nikolaos Michaloliakos, a Holocaust denier who founded the neo-Nazi movement in the early 1980s, they claim to be victims of political persecution.
NO PLACE FOR NAZIS
Yet nearly five and a half years after the trial began, Athens’ normally divided political class is united in the belief that this week’s decision could be as cathartic as it is decisive.
Writing in Saturday’s Syntakton newspaper, leaders from across the spectrum rejoiced in “the end of Golden Dawn.”
“Greece suffered as few countries from Nazism,” Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis wrote. “It mourned victims, it experienced tragedies, it endured destruction. That is why it fought Nazism. There is no place in our country for [its] mimics and followers.”
Calling the trial’s conclusion “a historic milestone for Greek democracy,” former Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras said that the extremists had been forced to confront their “horrible acts.”
Neighborhoods had been soaked in fear and blood.
“Golden Dawners are no longer in parliament and after the trial’s conclusion the members of this criminal gang must go to jail,” he added.
The verdict is expected to be the denouement of Golden Dawn’s terminal decline. Riven by feuds, defections and factional infighting, the group has all but collapsed since narrowly failing to cross the 3 percent threshold into parliament last year. Yet no country in modern Europe has come as close to an overtly Nazi group strutting the national stage.
For a nation reeling for the past decade from the twin ills of austerity and economic despair — the by-product of wrenching budget cuts and tax hikes enforced in return for international rescue funds to eschew bankruptcy — the rise and fall of the fascist outfit offers a cautionary tale.
Not since the restoration of democracy with the collapse of military rule in 1974 has a party as ideologically extreme, thuggish or brutal been catapulted into Athens’ 300-seat parliament.
At its 2012 peak, Golden Dawn won 7 percent of the vote to become Greece’s third largest political force.
Its tattooed officials sowed fear and hate on the streets. The targets of attacks, often staged by specially trained hit squads, ranged from communist trade unionists and other leftist radicals to “subhuman” immigrants and members of the LGBTQ community.
The politics of hate were the glue that held its black-shirted supporters together — most in working class areas worst hit by EU-mandated austerity.
“Golden Dawn was the expression of blind rage, a primitive roar for people driven by anger and revenge,” said Fotini Tsaliloglou, for years one of Greece’s foremost professors of psychology. “The crisis has ebbed and it has collapsed like a house of cards. I hope what we are about to see will be the end of the end.”
Party fanatics rarely questioned Michaloliakos, who allegedly demanded to be called Supreme Fuhrer, and whose love of Hitler was such he once told a TV station: “There were no crematoria, it’s a lie. Or gas chambers.”
Before Fyssas’ murder in September 2013, countless unknown migrants are also thought to have died at the hands of Golden Dawn.
Such was its brazenness of its tactics that across Europe the far right, including Marine Le Pen’s National Rally party, then known as Front National, looked on with thinly disguised disdain.
Its use of symbols inspired by the Third Reich — its emblem bears an uncanny resemblance to the swastika — its racist rhetoric and refusal to disavow National Socialism, despite casting itself in later years as a far-right patriotic party, were too much for most of the rest of Europe’s far-right groups.
OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE
For the lawyers representing its victims, the goal is the conviction of the party’s leadership, not only low-ranking members who coordinated attacks and attended nights with flaming torches.
The evidence is overwhelming. The case file includes hundreds of incriminating videos and more than 6,000 documents of testimonies describing the party’s hierarchical and military structure.
In one video clip Michaloliakos’ deputy, Christos Pappas, is seen teaching children to give the perfect Nazi salute and chant “Heil Hitler.”
Among a host of Nazi paraphernalia discovered by police in his home, the videos form part of the case file against Pappas, the son of a military officer and close associate of the former Greek dictator Georgios Papadopoulos.
Five Golden Dawn members, now in witness protection schemes, have also provided rich insight into the party’s inner workings.
“The court’s decision is going to send a message to the whole of Greek society,” said Chryssa Papadopoulou, the lawyer representing Fyssas’ family. “If we are to prevent this from happening again, it’s very important that everyone is convicted, not just those lower down the chain, but the leaders who inculcated national socialism, this ideology of hate, into the minds of so many people.”
Aliki Mouriki, a sociologist at the National Center of Social Research, also believes the court decision will help close the door on a dark chapter in the country’s recent past.
“Symbolically it’s going to be a very powerful moment,” she said.
“Though it has taken so long to get here, this belated and protracted process has already united hugely disparate parties. There is a sense that democratic institutions can help remedy some of the racial intolerance and hatred cultivated during the crisis.”
However, like other observers, Mouriki is far from persuaded that the court’s ruling will be the wrecking ball that smashes the allure of far-right extremism in Greece.
A poll released by the Metron Analysis research agency last week showed a breakaway party, Greeks for the Homeland, led by Ilias Kasidiaris, one of Michaloliakos’ most trusted lieutenants, garnering almost 1.5 percent of the vote barely four months after its foundation.
Among its central tenets is the belief that Greeks are soon to become a minority, outnumbered by immigrants in their own country.
“It’s not a good sign that so many hardcore far-right supporters are already flocking to this party,” Mouriki said. “What worries me is the failure of the Greek state to pursue any integration of the thousands of migrants and refugees who land on our shores. It has only focused on reception and that creates the space for extremist groups to step in.”
“Golden Dawn may be over, but the poison of the far right may well not be,” she added.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under