Diplomatic breakthroughs between Israel and Gulf monarchies have revealed fissures in the relationship between Palestine and Arab governments — and raised questions over whether they can still be relied on to champion the Palestinian cause.
For years, Israel has vigorously pursued ties with the Arab world, focusing on powerful Gulf countries with whom it shares a common enemy in Iran and who crave its high-tech security and espionage products.
Those efforts bore fruit when Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) last week signed accords with Israel at a White House ceremony to establish diplomatic relationships.
While not truly a peace deal — the two Gulf states have never been at war with Israel — the public ties smashed apart widespread isolation of Israel in the region that the Palestinian leadership saw as vital leverage in its struggle for independence.
“We definitely feel betrayed,” Palestine Liberation Organization Secretary-General Saeb Erekat said, condemning the deals as a “tremendous encouragement for the Israeli government to continue their occupation.”
Under a 2002 Arab Peace Initiative, Arab nations declared Israel would only receive “normal” ties in return for a statehood deal with the Palestinians and an end to the occupation.
That longstanding policy had now been undercut, Palestinian Ambassador to the UK Husam Zomlot wrote in an article published in the left-leaning Israeli newspaper Haaretz after the deals were signed.
“Some argue that the ‘old ways’ have failed, that it is time to try something new. But as a matter of basic logic, it is clear that Israel will not end its occupation out of the kindness of its heart — after all, it has had plenty of opportunities,” Zomlot said. “It might have done so given proper incentives, but these incentives are less now that the UAE and Bahrain have rewarded Israel for nothing.”
US President Donald Trump said that several more Arab states would soon announce their intention to sign similar deals, suggesting a more substantive shift.
In the West Bank and Gaza, “the Abraham accords,” as they have been dubbed by Washington, did not come as a surprise.
“Relationships are based on pure interest. Nobody cares about the Palestinian issue,” said Shadi Abu Samra, a 35-year-old social worker from Ramallah. “I am not at all astonished. It was expected one day. There have been relations for a long time between Israel and the Gulf states.”
Dalia Karazon, a mathematics teacher from the same city, said that she understood that Gulf states wanted to build a front against Iran with Israel’s help and also to appease Trump, whose support base in the US includes vehemently pro-Israel evangelical Christians. What frustrated her was that the UAE and Bahrain claimed the accords would help the Palestinians.
“They can do whatever they want, but they should not relate that to our interest, because our interest is to end the occupation and not reconcile with it,” she said.
Arafat al-Daf, a 21-year-old student from Gaza, said that the move simply added to Palestinian disappointment, “from ourselves, from the Arabs, from the world.”
Palestinian officials say that regional pressure is more critical now than it has been for years. Threats of further regional isolation, helped dissuade Israel from going ahead this summer with its much-publicized plans to annex parts of the occupied West Bank, they say.
“The Arabs had a major role,” one Palestinian official said on condition of anonymity.
Under Israel’s deal with the UAE, it agreed to suspend annexation, but critics of the deal say that clause was only added as lip service to the Palestinian issue.
Meanwhile, politicians in Israel argue that the annexation plan is still a priority.
Allies of the Palestinian leadership are also concerned. Jordan, while being the only other country apart from Egypt to have signed a formal peace agreement with Israel following devastating wars, sees Arab world apathy as problematic.
For Amman, whose population is mostly Palestinian, the fallout of annexation could be destabilizing.
“We’ve heard countries say different things in different contexts. But Jordan’s responsibility is to say things as we see it, with all the responsibilities coming down the road,” Jordanian Prime Minister Omar Razzaz said in an interview in July. “Sometimes, it’s hard to say the truth as it is. And people want to avoid it at certain times, but our responsibility is to remind the region and the world that if we look the other way, this will come to haunt us.”
Meanwhile, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has moved into what he sees as a moral vacuum, increasingly styling himself as the Palestinians’ lone international champion.
After Trump’s peace plan — a blueprint for Israel’s annexation plans — was published in January, Erdogan said Turkey would never accept the proposals and accused the Arab Gulf nations of betraying the Palestinian cause.
“When we look at the stance of countries in the Muslim world toward this step and the announced text, I pity us. Saudi Arabia mostly, you are silent. When will you speak? The same goes for Oman, Bahrain, the Abu Dhabi leadership,” Erdogan said in comments to members of his ruling party in Ankara. “Some Arab countries supporting such a plan are betraying Jerusalem, their own peoples and most of all, humanity.”
In a Facebook post on Wednesday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) wrote: “The KMT must fall for Taiwan to improve.’ Allow me to ask the question again: Is this really true?” It matters not how many times Hsu asks the question, my answer will always be the same: “Yes, the KMT must be toppled for Taiwan to improve.” In the lengthy Facebook post, titled “What were those born in the 1980s guilty of?” Hsu harked back to the idealistic aspirations of the 2014 Sunflower movement before heaping opprobrium on the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP)
The scuffle between Chinese embassy staffers in Fiji and a Taiwanese diplomat at a Republic of China (ROC) Double Ten National Day celebration has turned into a public relations opportunity for the government, Beijing and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Although the incident occurred on Oct. 8, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) downplayed it, only for the story to be picked up by the foreign media, forcing the ministry to respond. The public and opposition parties asked why the government had failed to remonstrate more strongly in the first instance. It is still unclear whether the ministry missed a trick
US President Donald Trump and his Democratic rival, former US vice president Joe Biden, are holding their final debate tonight. In their foreign policy debate, China is sure to be a major issue of contention for the two candidates. Here are several questions the moderator should pose to the candidates: For both: In the first televised US presidential debates in 1960, then-Democratic candidate John F. Kennedy and his Republican counterpart, Richard Nixon, were asked whether the US should intervene if communist China attacked Taiwan’s outlying islands of Kinmen and Matsu. Kennedy said no, unless the main island of Taiwan was also attacked.
For most of us, the colorful, otherworldly marinescapes of coral reefs are as remote as the alien landscapes of the moon. We rarely, if ever, experience these underwater wonderlands for ourselves — we are, after all, air-breathing, terrestrial creatures mostly cocooned in cities. It is easy not to notice the perilous state they are in: We have lost 50 percent of coral reefs in the past 20 years and more than 90 percent are expected to die by 2050, a presentation at the Ocean Sciences Meeting in San Diego, California, earlier this year showed. As the oceans heat further and