In 2011, Ethiopia launched construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) along the Blue Nile to secure its water resources and generate hydropower, but the project has been highly controversial, with Egypt, located downriver, objecting strongly to it.
Unless the two countries can reach a negotiated settlement, the entire region could be plunged into conflict.
For Ethiopia, the GERD could ease a chronic energy shortage that has left more than 55 percent of the country’s population without access to electricity.
The dam also has emotional significance, promising to fulfill a dream long etched in the public’s imagination.
However, the Nile River is strategically significant for every country it touches.
Egypt’s agricultural sector depends heavily on its waters. Dam building raises serious concerns for everyone downstream.
That shared dependence on the Nile is why, in 1999, 10 countries created the Nile Basin Initiative as a forum to discuss the sustainable management and development of the river’s resources.
The initiative then began developing a Cooperative Framework Agreement (CFA), which outlined countries’ principles, rights and obligations and sought to establish a permanent Nile River Basin Commission to facilitate the CFA’s implementation.
However, in 2010, Egypt and Sudan rejected the CFA. A year later, Ethiopia began building the GERD, choosing to self-finance the US$4.8 billion project.
The first filling of the reservoir was completed last month, and the remaining 25 percent of the project is scheduled be finished when the dry season arrives.
Meanwhile, tripartite talks, mediated by the African Union, have continued, but have yielded no progress, owing to two sticking points.
The first is drought mitigation: Egypt wants to secure a much higher flow of water during dry years than Ethiopia is willing to concede.
The second is dispute resolution: Should a binding arbitration clause be included in a treaty?
Mistrust between the parties has reinforced the impasse, fueling tensions that could lead to violence. Yet experience elsewhere shows that a better outcome is possible.
In the 1970s, Brazil and Paraguay initiated a binational effort to construct a massive hydroelectric dam on the Parana River, located on their shared border.
The Itaipu Dam — completed in 1984 — today generates about 88 percent of Paraguay’s electricity and more than 11 percent of Brazil’s supply, making it a world leader in renewable-energy production capacity.
However, the Itaipu Dam project faced considerable resistance from Argentina, a downstream country that, like Egypt today, worried about its water supply.
Owing to its objections, international financial institutions initially refused to finance the dam’s construction. The problem was resolved with the conclusion of the Acuerdo Tripartito between Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay, which the three signed in 1979.
The agreement established acceptable changes in water levels, as well as environmental protections and water-quality standards.
To monitor compliance, the agreement established a mechanism for the three countries to exchange information on hydrological conditions.
Moreover, an institutional framework for cooperation and transboundary water management was created for the Parana Basin.
The instruments and institutions established at the Itaipu Dam’s inception continue to support dispute resolution.
Today, extreme drought has severely reduced the Parana River’s water flow, reducing Argentina’s water supply and making it difficult in landlocked Paraguay to navigate the river, which is essential for its agricultural export industry.
While no independent arbitration body is in place to manage this crisis, the affected countries have negotiated an amicable solution, based on the 1970s treaties and international law.
The binational council managing the dam agreed to release just enough water from the reservoir to ease the drought’s effects for downstream countries, without compromising energy production.
The work of technical commissions and exchange of data on hydrological conditions among institutions in all affected countries were critical to the negotiations’ success.
This experience offers valuable lessons for Egypt and Ethiopia, including the value of treaties and international law for long-term dispute resolution.
More broadly, it shows how institutionalization and cooperation can help to build trust — and bring shared benefits.
The Itaipu project has contributed to regional economic integration, by providing the resources to finance infrastructure, such as international bridges, airports and highways, as well as social and environmental development projects.
Likewise, once the GERD reaches full capacity, it can contribute to creating a regional energy market.
As the effects of climate change become increasingly apparent, so does the imperative of using natural resources more efficiently and equitably, and shifting to renewable energy sources.
By following in the footsteps of Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay, the Nile countries can make important progress toward those goals — and set a powerful global precedent for the use of transboundary resources to foster sustainable development.
Biniam Bedasso is a researcher and public-finance specialist at the Collaborative Africa Budget Reform Initiative. Maria Gwynn is on leave from the Institute for Public International Law at the University of Bonn to serve as Governing Council member of the Binational Entity Itaipu.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In November last year, a man struck a woman with a steel bar and killed her outside a hospital in China’s Fujian Province. Later, he justified his actions to the police by saying that he attacked her because she was small and alone, and he was venting his anger after a dispute with a colleague. To the casual observer, it could be seen as another case of an angry man gone mad for a moment, but on closer inspection, it reflects the sad side of a society long brutalized by violent political struggles triggered by crude Leninism and Maoism. Starting
If social media interaction is any yardstick, India remained one of the top countries for Taiwan last year. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has on several occasions expressed enthusiasm to strengthen cooperation with India, one of the 18 target nations in her administration’s New Southbound Policy. The past year was instrumental in fostering Taiwan-India ties and will be remembered for accelerated momentum in bilateral relations. However, most of it has been confined to civil society circles. Even though Taiwan launched its southbound policy in 2016, the potential of Taiwan-India engagement remains underutilized. It is crucial to identify what is obstructing greater momentum
In terms of the economic outlook for the semiconductor industry, Taiwan has outperformed the rest of the world for three consecutive years. This is quite rare. In addition, Taiwan has been playing an important role in the US-China technology dispute, and both want Taiwan on their side, reflecting the remaking of the nation’s semiconductor industry. Under the leadership of — above all — Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the industry as a whole has shifted from a focus on capacity to a focus on quality, as companies now have to be able to provide integration of hardware and software, as well as
The US last week took action to remove most of the diplomatic red tape around US-Taiwan relations. While there have been adjustments in State Department “Guidelines on Relations with Taiwan” and other guidance before, no administration has ever so thoroughly dispensed with them. It is a step in the right direction. Of course, when there is a policy of formally recognizing one government (the People’s Republic of China or PRC) and not another (the Republic of China or ROC), officials from the top of government down need a systematic way of operationalizing the distinction. They cannot just make it up as