When Chinese police raided the Guangzhou hotel room of Mark Swidan and arrested him on Nov. 13, 2012, he was on the telephone to his mother, Katherine.
Mark Swidan had been in China sourcing building materials for his business, Katherine Swidan said, and they were discussing booking his ticket home to Houston, Texas, for his wedding, when he said there was a knock at the door.
“I heard banging, then I didn’t hear anything after that,” she recalled.
Some excruciating weeks later, she said, the US consulate told her that they had tracked him down — he had been arrested and detained on drug trafficking charges.
It would be a year before Mark Swidan saw trial in the Jiangmen Intermediate People’s Court, and another five — all spent in squalid detention — before he was found guilty, sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve in April last year. The conviction appeared to come out of the blue, at the same time US officials were in Beijing for trade talks.
Amid deepening hostilities between Beijing and the US, Canada and other Western nations, there are fears such cases are being leveraged.
Mark Swidan is by no means the only foreigner to be detained in China. His case has attracted little publicity, but is now discussed in the context of growing hostilities between the Chinese Communist Party, and the US and other Western allies.
Amid tit-for-tat consulate closures, sanctions, and a growing number of criminal prosecutions that appear to be retaliatory or diplomatically strategic, governments are also warning their citizens in China that they are at increased risk of arbitrary detention.
Katherine Swidan said that Mark Swidan has tried to take his own life three times in detention, and was shackled to the floor after one attempt.
“Mark is in a center that is caged with probably 25 other people. There’s a hole in the ground for a toilet. They ration toilet paper. There’s no hot water, even in the winter,” Katherine Swidan said.
“He told me: ‘Mama, I’ve never been so cold in my life.’ I look at his little boy pictures, and I just want him to be warm.”
Mark Swidan’s supporters have said the little evidence supporting his arrest, let alone conviction, was weak and circumstantial.
Humanitarian and prisoner advocacy group Dui Hua said that no forensic evidence has been produced linking him to any drug transaction.
John Kamm, the chairman of Dui Hua, has advocated for about 6,000 prisoners over the past 30 years, and said it has secured clemency for several hundred.
In direct contact with the Chinese government, Kamm’s advocacy is usually limited to political and religious prisoners, but when he was approached by Katherine Swidan about her son’s case he decided to take it on.
“I have never seen such a violation of an individual’s due process rights. It is appalling,” Kamm told reporters from San Francisco. “In my opinion he’s been persecuted, he’s been set up.”
The reprieve in Mark Swidan’s sentence suspends execution for two years, with the possibility it would be commuted to a jail term for good behavior.
It is common enough in China’s legal system, but Mark Swidan is believed to be the first American to receive it.
“We don’t know what’s going to happen at the end of that reprieve,” Katherine said, and feared that if China closes Guangzhou’s US consulate like it did in Chengdu then her son will have even less representation and support.
“He told me: Mama I’m going to come home in a box of ashes or on a plane, but I will come home,” she said.
China’s judicial system is notoriously harsh and lacking in judicial fairness. About 99 percent of cases end in conviction and while there are occasional acquittals, including one last month, they are rare.
Kamm said the authorities are trying to get Mark Swidan to plead guilty by “holding him in an absolute hellhole.”
“I’d stake my life on it, this man is innocent. He’s a victim of serious human rights abuses, and the UN agrees,” he said.
In February, the UN working group on arbitrary detention concluded that Swidan had been arbitrarily detained in contravention of international law, and urged his immediate release “with compensation and other reparations.”
Nothing has happened.
The Swidans are from Houston, Texas, with little financial means for legal assistance.
Mark Swidan’s father died when he was young, and he used a small inheritance to travel, Katherine Swidan told reporters.
She described her son as an artist and a cook, and very smart, proudly saying that he read Dostoyevsky in the eighth grade. He was due to get married in Houston a month after his return from China.
In the years since Mark Swidan was detained, both Katherine Swidan and her other son have been treated for cancer. She was allowed to speak to Mark Swidan before her surgery, but his brother was not before his.
She is angry about the lack of support she feels she has had from successive US administrations to free her son from an oppressive state prison.
In a report on capital punishment last year, Amnesty International said that the death penalty in Chinese drug-related cases “appeared to play a central role in the middle of political stand-offs with some foreign countries.”
In June, Australian man Karm Gilespie — whose seven-year detention in China was until then unknown — was found guilty of drugs charges and sentenced to death.
The sudden ruling five years after his trial coincided with China and Australia having one of their worst diplomatic rows in decades.
Last month, another Australian citizen, business journalist for Chinese state media Cheng Lei (成蕾), was taken into the secretive form of solitary detention by Chinese authorities.
In December 2018, Canadian authorities arrested Huawei Technologies Co chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou (孟晚舟). Just days later former Canadian diplomat Michael Kovrig and businessman Michael Spavor were arrested in a move widely seen as retaliatory.
In January last year, onlookers were horrified when a Chinese court increased Canadian man Robert Lloyd Schellenberg’s sentence from 15 years in prison to execution after he appealed the verdict.
This month, a Chinese court sentenced Canadian Xu Weihong (徐偉洪) to death on drugs charges.
“This is the level of China’s game,” said former foreign correspondent Peter Humphries, who was also detained in China for several years.
China denies the cases are linked to politics.
When asked about Xu’s sentence, a spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that it saw no effect on China-Canada relations.
“I want to stress that Chinese judiciary independently handles the case in strict accordance with Chinese law and legal procedures,” the spokesman said.
“I’ve come to the view that basically all cases involving Americans have a political element,” Kamm said. “Especially these days. The way things are, the Chinese government is in no mood to do anything for Americans.”
Both Katherine Swidan and Kamm spoke furiously of an apparent lack of action, or even interest, from the US government.
Kamm accused an unnamed Washington official of admonishing him for “making waves” when he was pushing for a UN intervention.
The US Department of State declined to answer questions on the case, but said it was providing consular assistance to Mark Swidan.
“The Chinese government does not currently allow in-person consular visits, but we have communicated with Mr Swidan monthly since his arrest,” a spokesman said. “We will resume in-person visits in accordance with guidance from health authorities once the Chinese government lifts its restrictions on consular visits.”
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his