In May, facing urgent international demands for action after a string of massive wildfires in the Amazon, Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro put the army in charge of protecting the rainforest.
Instead, The Associated Press found that the operation dubbed “Green Brazil 2” has had the opposite effect.
Under military command, Brazil’s once-effective, but recently declining investigation and prosecution of rainforest destruction by ranchers, farmers and miners has come to a virtual halt, even as this year’s burning season picks up.
Illustration: Yusha
The Brazilian army appears to be focusing on dozens of small road-and-bridge-building projects that allow exports to flow faster to ports and ease access to protected areas, opening the rainforest to further exploitation.
In the meantime, there have been no major raids against illegal activity since Bolsonaro required military approval for them in May, according to public officials, reporting from the area and interviews with nine current and former members of Brazil’s environmental enforcement agency.
The AP also found that:
‧ The number of fines issued for environmental crimes has dropped by almost half since four years ago, especially under Bolsonaro.
‧ Two high-ranking officials from the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA), said they have stopped using satellite maps to locate deforestation sites and fine their owners — a once-widely used technique.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the press.
‧ IBAMA is no longer penalizing the heads of big networks of illegal logging, mining and farming, two other officials said, while three IBAMA officials said that meat packers who sell beef from deforested areas now operate freely.
The order putting the military in charge of fighting deforestation was initially due to end in June, but it was recently extended by Bolsonaro until November, despite widespread criticism that it is making the problem worse.
After the AP story came out, the government went a step further, announcing that all operations against illegal deforestation would be stopped as of yesterday — effectively gutting IBAMA and leaving just the army in place in the Amazon.
The decision of Brazilian Minister of the Environment Ricardo Salles came after the Brazilian Ministry of the Economy and chief of staff blocked about US$11 million to be spent on protection, the equivalent of 1,346 firefighters, 77 environmental inspection agents and dozens of vehicles nationwide.
“It is a lie that there is no money,” said Claudio Angelo, spokesman for Brazilian advocacy group Climate Observatory. “They are finding a perfect justification to not fulfill their constitutional obligation to protect the Amazon. This is also a vaccine for the minister to excuse himself from responsibility for the raging deforestation.”
At stake is the fate of the forest itself and hopes of limiting global warming.
Experts say that blazes and deforestation are pushing the world’s largest rainforest toward a tipping point, after which it would cease to generate enough rainfall to sustain itself.
About two-thirds of the forest would then begin an irreversible, decades-long decline into tropical savanna.
The Amazon has lost about 17 percent of its original area, and at the current pace, is expected to reach a tipping point in the next 15 to 30 years. As it decomposes, it will release hundreds of billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
“From the occupation of the land to mining and the fires, it is all connected,” said Suely Vaz, who headed IBAMA between 2016 and last year and is now a specialist at the Climate Observatory, which is comprised of 50 non-governmental groups. “IBAMA should fight the whole network of deforestation, but it just doesn’t now.”
Bolsonaro’s office and IBAMA did not respond to requests for comment, but Bolsonaro said in May that “our effort is great, enormous in fighting fires and deforestation.”
He also called reports of the forest being on fire “a lie.”
The Brazilian Ministry of Defense defended its record, saying that its deployment was “an operation of multiple agencies” involving 2,090 people a day, along with 89 vehicles and 19 ships.
“Those figures are rising by the day, as resources become available and operations are gradually intensified,” the defense ministry said.
It said that the operation had led to the destruction of 253 machines involved in illegal logging as of Monday last week, but did not specify what type of machines or say anything about other illegal activities such as mining.
While the threat under Bolsonaro’s administration is the latest and most severe, efforts to preserve the Amazon have been struggling for years.
In the 2003-2011 administration of former Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Brazil developed a multiagency plan to slow Amazon deforestation that worked well, according to virtually all observers.
That ended in 2012 when the government of his successor, Dilma Rousseff, pardoned illegal deforestation prior to 2008, among other measures that emboldened violators.
Many believe Bolsonaro will issue new pardons.
IBAMA once had more than 1,300 agents. That has dropped to about 600 since 2012, when the agency stopped hiring under Rousseff in an attempt to rein in spending.
The weakening of IBAMA accelerated after Rousseff was ousted in 2016 and replaced by right-wing former Brazilian president Michel Temer.
Observers on all sides say that the change has been far more fast-moving and dramatic since Bolsonaro was elected in 2018, after a campaign that dismissed the threat of deforestation and pledged more development of the rainforest.
In the field, IBAMA has hundreds of inspectors who are supposed to conduct investigations, raid illegal sites, issue fines, destroy equipment and request arrests by local and federal police, along with a corps of temporary contract firefighters.
However, after the last major raid by IBAMA against illegal mining in April, the two inspectors in charge were fired by the Brazilian Ministry of Environment, allegedly for “political-ideological bias.”
A former Brazilian secretary of government under Bolsonaro, General Carlos Alberto dos Santos Cruz, said that the army is best at supporting inspections in the Amazon, not leading them.
“In some places you cannot find any other institution, no police or IBAMA. There’s no structure and the military steps up,” he said. “The armed forces can help and they are helping, but inspections need to be done by those that are experts, and you have to work with local authorities, they are the ones who know who the criminals are.”
In 2016, the year Temer took office, there were almost 10,000 fines nationwide for environmental crimes, IBAMA’s Web site said.
Last year, the first year of the Bolsonaro presidency, that shrank to 7,148. In the first six months of this year, it stood at 3,721.
Brazilian Ministry of Defense figures confirm that fines under operation Green Brazil 2 have continued at a lower rate, with 1,526 fines so far over about three months worth almost US$80 million.
“There is a reduction in fines because the president doesn’t like them, campaigns against them,” an IBAMA inspector based in the Amazon said.
He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak with the press by agency heads in the capital, Brasilia.
“Appointees to local IBAMA offices know that,” the official said. “If a given unit fines too much, they get a call from Brasilia.”
Last week, a group of five soldiers and five IBAMA firefighters drove into Nova Fronteira, a remote district in Para state. Satellite images showed a big fire threatening part of the forest on the edges of a private property.
Upon arrival, they saw a wooden gate closed with a single padlock. In the past, IBAMA staff would enter private properties in emergencies, as allowed by Brazilian law. That policy has changed with the army’s arrival.
“We can’t come in if the owner is not here,” said one soldier, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the press.
A simple, but effective change could be issuing fines to land owners through satellite imagery-aided investigation.
An IBAMA data specialist said that 70 percent of deforestation in many areas can be located on aerial maps by Brazil’s space agency.
That alone would allow IBAMA to find who owns the land and hold them accountable — which is not happening under the army, agency veterans said.
“We are not even trying now,” one high-ranking official said.
A former top IBAMA official said that the army did not know how to lead investigations and could not legally issue fines, seize equipment or block construction.
He spoke on condition of anonymity because he has received death threats from people involved in Amazon development.
“The army could use their technology to see where deforestation is growing, map it all and go after who is responsible, but they spend their time either stopping IBAMA from doing that or working on construction projects,” he said.
Another IBAMA agent who has organized hundreds of raids nationwide said that the agency is also no longer investigating the heads of big networks of illegal logging, mining and farming.
That type of high-end investigative work slowed down under Temer, with a few prominent exceptions, and stopped entirely under Bolsonaro, with new regional leaders of IBAMA offices tending to be former or active military or police officials seconded to civilian positions.
Those who support development applaud the army’s foray into the Amazon.
Part-time farmer Antonio Silva has noticed the changes in the operations of Brazil’s environmental enforcement agency — and he loves them.
Silva struggled for years doing odd jobs in northern Brazil before he moved to the country’s Amazon frontier and bought himself a 1.62 hectare poultry farm outside the city of Novo Progresso, where he also works as a security guard.
As ranching and mining ate into the rainforest, the city grew from a few thousand to 25,000 residents, and the market for Silva’s chickens and turkeys grew.
There are now three electronics stores in town, instead of just one.
He said that IBAMA used to aggressively patrol around his little farm, seeking out those who seized public land and chopped and burned the rainforest for profit.
A few years ago, they came in by helicopter, bringing police with machine guns. They arrested people and destroyed machinery.
“It was shocking,” Silva said. “It is better now ... they come twice a week to put out some fires, talk and that’s it.”
Every morning the city is covered in smoke from the previous days, which dissipates before fires start again in the afternoon. Novo Progresso has a dozen IBAMA inspectors and firefighters.
Residents say that inspectors have barely left the office since the army arrived and firefighters are being called only in urgent situations or long after the blazes are out.
Last week, a group of IBAMA firefighters drove two hours to a fire started three days earlier. An area equivalent to eight soccer fields had already been burned and some trees were still on fire, endangering a region of dense forest.
A man who did not identify himself blamed a neighbor for starting the blaze, but did not name the person or file a complaint.
Agents saw a chainsaw on the ground and the man took it away, without answering whether he had a license for it, as required by Brazilian law. Records show no investigation was opened and no fines were issued.
The former top IBAMA official said that the professional corps of inspectors used to have little fear of fining violators, confiscating their equipment or even destroying the whole operation.
After the inspectors had their powers cut back, poorly paid and locally hired firefighters started giving them less information on wrongdoing.
“The firefighters would do it at their own risk, and what for? After that gig ends six months later they have to live in the same place,” the former official said.
Additional reporting by Tatiana Pollastri, Marcelo Sousa and Ricardo Coletta
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals. For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion. In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC). Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues. During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the