The British government privately told Chinese technology giant Huawei that it was being banned from Britain’s 5G telecoms network partly for “geopolitical” reasons following huge pressure from US President Donald Trump, the Observer has learned.
In the days leading up to the controversial announcement on Tuesday last week, intensive discussions were held and confidential communications exchanged between the government and Whitehall officials on one side and Huawei executives on the other.
As part of the high-level behind-the-scenes contacts, Huawei was told that geopolitics had played a part, and was given the impression that it was possible the decision could be revisited, perhaps if Trump failed to win a second term and the anti-China stance in Washington eased.
Illustration: Mountain People
Senior Huawei executives have gone public since the decision, saying that they hope the British government will rethink, apparently encouraged by the results of back-channel contacts.
The government’s private admissions are out of kilter with public statements last week by ministers, who said that Huawei had been banned because of new security concerns raised by the British National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), which is part of the Government Communications Headquarters.
In the British House of Commons, British Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Oliver Dowden said that new sanctions forbidding the sale of US-produced components to Huawei — meaning the Chinese company would have to source them from elsewhere — had changed the balance of security risk.
“The new US measures restrict Huawei’s ability to produce important products using US technology or software,” he said. “The National Cyber Security Centre has reviewed the consequences of the US’ actions.”
“The NCSC has now reported to ministers that they have significantly changed their security assessment of Huawei’s presence in the UK 5G network,” Dowden said. “Given the uncertainty this creates around Huawei’s supply chain, the UK can no longer be confident it will be able to guarantee the security of future Huawei 5G equipment affected by the change in the US foreign direct product rules.”
Last week’s move reversed a decision made in January when the government announced that Huawei equipment could be used in its new 5G network on a restricted basis.
This led to fierce criticism from Tory lawmakers, including former Conservative Party leader Iain Duncan Smith, who described Huawei as an arm of the Chinese Communist Party and a risk to the UK.
The reversal of the January announcement pleased all but the most hardline anti-Huawei Tory lawmakers, but it has called into question British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s manifesto promise to supply superfast broadband to every home and business across the country by 2025, and led the Chinese to warn of retaliation.
However, Beijing’s response was more muted than many on the UK side had feared.
The decision has also led to accusations that the UK government is putting its loyalty to Trump — who is waging a diplomatic war against China over COVID-19, human rights, trade, its stance on Hong Kong and Huawei in the run-up to the US presidential elections — before its commitment to put the UK in the vanguard of global technological advances.
At a news conference at the White House on Tuesday last week, Trump immediately claimed credit for the UK decision — “I did this myself, for the most part” — and said that he was trying to force other nations not to use Huawei.
Rejecting claims that the UK government was kowtowing to Trump because of the UK’s need to sign a post-Brexit trade deal with Washington, British Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Matt Hancock dismissed the president’s claim.
“We all know Donald Trump, don’t we, but I think this is a sensible decision. All sorts of people can try to claim credit for the decision, but this was based on a technical assessment by the National Cyber Security Centre about how we can have the highest quality 5G systems in the future,” he told Sky News.
Lord O’Neill, an economist who was brought into the government as commercial secretary to the Treasury in 2015, said that the private explanations given to Huawei made the decision seem “more rational.”
“Given that the prime minister continues to describe himself as a Sinophile, one would think that he is trying to minimize the damage. Otherwise, the decision does not make any sense whatsoever. China has been the biggest contributor to global GDP in the last 20 years. So why would we want to cut ourselves off from that?” O’Neill said.
However, Tory lawmakers would be infuriated by any suggestion that there could be another U-turn on Huawei.
Several have vowed to push Johnson further to ban Huawei from the UK altogether, including from existing 2G, 3G and 4G networks.
Labour lawmaker Kevan Jones, a former British shadow minister for the armed forces who now serves on the British Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament, said it was clear that US pressure had swayed the government.
“Of course security should be the number one priority, but it is clear this decision was taken for geopolitical reasons, rather than taking into account the economic costs to the UK,” he said.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Monday arrived in London to hold talks with Tory lawmakers, including Duncan Smith, who are opposed to Huawei. He is expected to try to lobby other European governments on his visit.
Huawei refused to comment on its talks with civil servants and ministers and pointed to a statement issued last week saying: “This disappointing decision is bad news for anyone in the UK with a mobile phone. It threatens to move Britain into the digital slow lane, push up bills and deepen the digital divide. Instead of ‘levelling up’ the government is levelling down and we urge them to reconsider. We remain confident that the new US restrictions would not have affected the resilience or security of the products we supply to the UK.”
A British Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport spokesperson said: “We have banned the purchase of any new 5G Huawei equipment after 31 December this year, and will remove all Huawei equipment from 5G networks by the end of 2027.”
“This was a decision taken by ministers at the National Security Council, based on technical, security analysis from the world-leading National Cyber Security Centre,” he added.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs