The Institute for National Defense and Security Research has published its Special Report on Gray Zone Conflicts, in which it discussed the growing trend for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to employ tactics such as information warfare, cyberwarfare and military force and intimidation against Taiwan, sending in aircraft carriers, initiating maritime conflicts and spreading fake news.
These tactics are reminiscent of those used in Russia’s annexation of the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine, which were regarded by military strategy experts as an example of hybrid warfare.
Beijing is applying this gray zone conflict warfare tactic in the three Asian conflict hotspots — the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the East China Sea — as identified in the “Deteriorated Situations” section of last month’s edition of the International Crisis Group publication Crisis Watch.
Over the past several years, in particular, the CCP has been employing these gray zone conflict tactics in the region, using military and non-military approaches, including the many incursions of People’s Liberation Army Air Force fighters into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone.
This author believes that these tactics are the precursor to Beijing’s execution of hybrid warfare against Taiwan. Taiwanese need to take this very seriously
Beijing began implementing gray zone conflict tactics some time ago. It has combined soft and hard power, through economics and military intimidation, and has done all within its power to sow division in Taiwanese society and amplify ethnic conflict, all in an attempt to turn around the public’s identification as Taiwanese.
These are ways in which the CCP has mobilized non-military means to make up a large percentage of its overall hybrid warfare campaign, with the intention of first infiltrating Taiwan and then using its ability to control discourse to foment social unrest through manipulation of public opinion, and then pave the way for the military aspect of the campaign with its implementation of its “Anti-Secession” Law and the Hong Kong national security legislation.
The CCP is flexing its military muscles: This show of strength is not aimed solely at Taiwan — it is also for broadcast to the whole world.
China has announced its intention to conduct large-scale military exercises in the South China Sea next month to simulate the taking of the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) — which Taiwan also claims — most likely as a way to intimidate the nation’s armed forces and erode their morale.
Fortunately, Taiwanese and their armed forces are quite confident in their ability to defend their nation, and the military was not intimidated by the CCP in the slightest, moving its own military exercises to the Pratas Islands to demonstrate its resolve in protecting the nation.
Many of Taiwan’s allies are also decrying Beijing’s behavior, proving that China is creating a negative image for itself as a neighborhood bully, one that it refuses to acknowledge.
Its behavior is entirely at odds with its stated goal of achieving peace and stability in the Strait.
The ultimate objective of the salami slicing and gray zone conflict tactics China is using to wage its cognitive and hybrid warfare on Taiwan is to create divisions in Taiwanese society and to disorientate the nation.
The government needs to redouble its efforts in the fields of national defense, economy, diplomacy, media, legislation, information and education, and to combine them and bolster the entire nation’s resolve, so that the CCP’s plans are eventually foiled.
Chang Ling-ling is a political instructor at National Defense University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has