A China Airlines Airbus A330 nearly overran the runway at Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport) on June 14 after its three primary computers, its thrust reversal and automatic braking systems, and its spoilers failed during landing. The pilot decelerated the plane by applying its manual braking system, which stopped it 9m short of the end of the runway, preventing a serious incident.
The plane’s three primary computers work independently, so they are unlikely to fail at the same time, and it is even rarer for the braking and reverse thrust systems to fail simultaneously.
Survey data about worldwide aviation incidents show that they are usually caused by one or more of three kinds of factors:
The first includes human errors, such as the ones likely made by pilots lacking sufficient experience on a particular aircraft. Other factors of this kind are whether flight data was correctly entered, how well air traffic controllers managed traffic flow and whether accurate weather data was provided.
One matter to thoroughly investigate in this incident is also whether the crew correctly calculated how much fuel the plane was carrying, and the weight and balance of its load.
Any one of these errors might cause a serious incident.
The second kind of factor includes mechanical failure and computer malfunctions.
The world’s two major manufacturers of large passenger aircraft — Boeing and Airbus — are established companies whose planes can be considered relatively safe. The question, then, is whether maintenance and repair tasks were properly performed.
An aircraft has more than 10,000 components, so proper maintenance and the timely replacement of potentially deficient parts are crucial.
For example, an incident on a flight from Italy to Tunisia occurred after maintenance personnel mistakenly replaced the fuel indicator of an ATR 72 turboprop plane with one designed for an ATR 42. This caused the ATR 72 to run out of fuel and crash.
Both planes are made by the same manufacturer, but that does not mean that the same component can be used in either aircraft.
This shows how maintenance crews’ professionalism and adherence to standard operating procedures have direct impact on aviation safety.
The third kind of factor includes weather phenomena. Danger can arise from hurricanes, thunderstorms, wind shear, turbulence or the relatively rare phenomenon of microbursts beneath cloud formations that can push aircraft toward the ground. Weather-related risks can be minimized by technological advances and improved airline safety standards.
Any of these factors might have contributed to the A330 incident. The pilot might have accidentally pressed the wrong button. Maintenance staff might have made a mistake when the plane was being serviced, or the aircraft might have been struck by lightning, causing its control system to malfunction.
The incident could have been caused by a problem with the plane’s original design, but that is unlikely: A330s have been in service for 28 years.
The plane was only carrying about 80 passengers, making it fairly light and relatively easy to slow down in time. If it had been fully laden with passengers and cargo, the greater weight would have made it more likely that the brakes would not have been able to decelerate the aircraft in time.
In view of this, the Civil Aeronautics Authority and other departments must thoroughly investigate the incident to prevent a recurrence.
Anderson Fu is a senior traffic manager at an airline.
Translated by Julian Clegg
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
Taiwan ranks second globally in terms of share of population with a higher-education degree, with about 60 percent of Taiwanese holding a post-secondary or graduate degree, a survey by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development showed. The findings are consistent with Ministry of the Interior data, which showed that as of the end of last year, 10.602 million Taiwanese had completed post-secondary education or higher. Among them, the number of women with graduate degrees was 786,000, an increase of 48.1 percent over the past decade and a faster rate of growth than among men. A highly educated population brings clear advantages.
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS