Defend the islands
I am writing in response to Yao Chung-yuan’s (姚中原) article (“Taiwan needs new approach on islands,” June 30, page 8).
I concur fully with Yao’s assertion, and by extension that of Ian Easton, that the Ministry of National Defense should permanently station personnel on the outlying islands of Taiwan.
Despite periodic training, Coast Guard Administration personnel do not have the combat skills to engage in the defense of the islands.
Taiwan’s sovereignty is at stake, be it on the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島), Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島), Kinmen, Wuciou Island (烏坵), Matsu, Pengjia Islet (彭佳嶼) and all outlying islands under Taiwan’s control. All are tempting targets for China to grab, which would result in a huge loss of face for President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
The prevailing notion in the ministry that it would not defend the outlying islands because of logistical resupply difficulties and other excuses is unacceptable. Whatever happened to the spirit of the Berlin airlift?
Interpreted another way, it reads: “Yes, we know you are Taiwanese citizens, but do not count on us to defend you.” What a sellout.
For its part, the US needs to buttress its security commitment to Taiwan by resurrecting the Formosa Resolution which was rescinded in 1974.
The resolution authorized the US president to militarily assist in securing all territories and other possessions under the control of the Republic of China.
Some look upon the islands as worthless piles of rock and sand, totally dismissing their defensive value. Each island has its own strategic value. Dongsha, for example, sits at the southern tip of the Taiwan Strait and the northern entrance of the South China Sea.
Control of Dongsha would enhance China’s ability to block access to both waterways impeding rapid transport of Middle Eastern oil to Japan and South Korea, provide a convenient stage for launching a blockade of Kaohsiung, and ensuring passage for submarine launched ballistic missiles aboard Chinese submarines transiting the Bashi Channel into the Western Pacific.
Such submarine movement is of crucial importance to the US since it would put Hawaii and the US mainland into closer range of Chinese nuclear missiles.
Defend the islands.
Bill Sharp
Visiting scholar at National Taiwan University and Taiwan Fellow
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under