Kindergartens, handicrafts markets, high-tech companies, hydroelectric dams and even political indoctrination camps — these are some of the sights international journalists are whisked around when they take part in all-expenses paid tours to China.
The motive of these invitations is, in the mantra of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), to “tell a good China story” to the outside world.
In the past, that story would have been told through clumsy Chinese Communist Party propaganda broadcast on its state-run news outlets.
Illustration: Yusha
However, during our research for the International Federation of Journalists, we found that Beijing is increasingly outsourcing the storytelling to foreign journalists, who often end up amplifying its messages in their own languages on the pages of their own news outlets.
At a roundtable discussion in Myanmar, all journalists present had been on all-expenses paid tours to China. One had been nine times. This was when we realized how systematic and sophisticated China’s global outreach campaign had become.
Journalists in half of the 58 countries we surveyed said they had been on such trips, and much of the reporting that came out was positive. While some were bowled over by China’s modernity and technological developments, others said they had signed agreements promising not to write critical reports.
It is worth noting that at a time when foreign-reporting budgets are shrinking, almost all those who took part believed these tours to be beneficial to their national media.
More than 120 US journalists have been on such tours, as well as at least 28 Australian journalists.
However, our analysis suggests that Beijing is especially targeting journalists from developing countries with repressive and ineffective governments, in particular those who have signed up to China’s massive global infrastructure project, the Belt and Road Initiative.
Under the title “Silk Road Celebrity China Tours,” Beijing has even taken Muslim journalists to visit the re-education camps where it is holding as many as 1 million Uighurs. In many cases, the reports they then wrote faithfully repeated Beijing’s talking points.
“They all wrote about how beautiful [Xinjiang is] or certain stories praising China for cracking down on terrorists,” one Filipino journalist said.
These journalists often end up doubly co-opted, with their presence harnessed for domestic propaganda purposes. After visiting a re-education camp in January last year, a group of 12 reporters saw their faces all across China’s television news as they smilingly interviewed detainees in tracksuits.
Across the globe, journalism unions and organizations are having their needs — whatever they might be — met by Chinese entities, often with the involvement of local Chinese embassies.
This spans the whole gamut from a couple of computers and tape recorders donated to a journalism union in Guinea-Bissau, all the way up to a state-of-the-art studio built with Chinese funding for Kenya Broadcasting Corp.
A third of the journalism unions surveyed had been approached to sign memorandums of understanding with Chinese entities.
China’s involvement in foreign media is growing almost faster than it can be tracked. There are co-productions, joint ventures, Chinese-sponsored television and radio shows, and even Chinese-funded news outlets such as the Pauk Phaw newspaper in Myanmar. Chinese companies are also using apps and Web browsers to capture digital audiences.
In India, the UC Browser news feed — which is in Hindi and 15 other local languages — has 50 million users. Despite clashes at the border, it is hard to find a single story on China-India border tensions.
Such media ventures risk becoming choke holds on global news delivery systems, potentially denying other narratives outside Beijing’s favored version while embedding Chinese influence in media ecosystems far outside its borders.
In this way, Beijing is reshaping the global news landscape. We often use English-language output as our yardstick, yet Beijing’s inroads in other languages has gone largely unnoticed.
In the past few months, disinformation campaigns are being waged not just in English, but also in for example Italian or Arabic.
The ultimate aim is ideological and geopolitical: China is pushing its own model of journalism as an alternative to the liberal western way of reporting, while hoping to translate positive coverage of its projects into votes in its favor in multilateral institutions such as the UN.
At a time when news organizations are being pauperized, reporters who accept Chinese hospitality might risk compromising their journalistic ideals.
It is perhaps hubris that independent-minded reporters believe they can take part in these tours without internalizing Beijing’s messages. Yet their very presence makes them tools of a Chinese government that uses them in domestic propaganda to shore up its own legitimacy.
As China multiplies its investment in news production and distribution across the world, its advances can only weaken the “fourth estate” model of journalism.
Louisa Lim and Julia Bergin are the authors of the International Federation of Journalists report “The China Story: reshaping the global media.” Lim is an audiovisual journalism lecturer at the University of Melbourne.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations