Seven major European investment firms said they would divest from beef producers, grains traders and even government bonds in Brazil if they do not see progress in resolving the surging destruction of the Amazon rainforest.
The rising threats from investors with more than US$2 trillion in assets under management, including Finland-based Nordea and the UK’s Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM), show how the private sector is taking global action to protect the world’s largest rainforest.
Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has shrugged off diplomatic pressure on the matter.
Deforestation of Brazil’s Amazon surged to an 11-year high last year, Bolsonaro’s first year in office, and has risen a further 34 percent in the first five months of this year, according to preliminary data from the Brazilian National Institute for Space Research. The right-wing populist has weakened environmental protections and called for more mining and farming in the Amazon region.
“The trends we’ve seen in Brazil are very concerning,” said Daniela da Costa-Bulthuis, Brazil portfolio manager for Netherlands-based asset manager Robeco. “You have a dismantling of the regulatory mechanisms of environmental control since last year.”
Bolsonaro’s press office declined to comment on the investors’ concerns.
Bolsonaro last year defended Brazil’s environmental record against criticism from world leaders as destructive fires in the Amazon drew global outcry. So far, corporate pressure has proven more effective in turning Brasilia’s attention to the environment.
A bill Bolsonaro originally proposed to grant property deeds for irregularly settled public land, a measure seen encouraging deforestation, last month failed to reach a vote and is delayed indefinitely after more than 40 mostly European companies threatened to boycott Brazilian exports.
In September last year, 230 institutional investors signed a letter calling for urgent action to combat the fires surging in the Amazon rainforest, capturing global attention.
However, seven asset management firms — Storebrand, AP7, KLP, DNB Asset Management, Robeco, Nordea Asset Management and LGIM — went further in laying out the threat of divestment if there is not progress. The firms hold more than US$5 billion in investments linked to Brazil, including global grains traders with major operations in the country.
Norway’s largest pension fund KLP said it was engaging with trading firms Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), Cargill and Bunge and judging if their environmental policies are adequate.
“If our conclusion is negative, divestment can be the likely result, potentially as soon as this year and we’d expect such a move to trigger other larger investors to follow our lead,” KLP head of responsible investment Jeanett Bergan said in an e-mail.
In response to questions on divestment, Bunge and Cargill described a range of efforts to root out deforestation from their supply chains, citing their adherence to the “Amazon Soy Moratorium.”
In that voluntary agreement, major trading firms including Cargill, Bunge and ADM pledged not to buy soy from parts of the Amazon deforested since 2008.
ADM did not respond to request for comment.
Norwegian insurance and pension provider Storebrand and Sweden’s largest national pension fund AP7 also said they could divest from ADM and Bunge if the companies do not take adequate measures to combat deforestation.
Norway’s DNB Asset Management AS said that index funds it manages, which include holdings in Bunge, could exclude companies that fail to meet its sustainability standards.
Other investment firms mentioned concerns related to Brazilian meatpackers, which have drawn scrutiny in the past for sourcing beef from deforested areas of the Amazon.
LGIM is pushing Brazilian companies, including the world’s largest meatpacker, JBS, and smaller rivals Marfrig and Minerva for “robust climate targets and land-use policies, with inaction potentially leading to voting sanctions and targeted divestments,” LGIM senior sustainability analyst Yasmine Svan said in an e-mailed statement.
JBS, Minerva and Marfrig said in separate statements they are committed to eliminating Amazon deforestation from their supply chains and detailed their efforts.
The asset management arm of Nordea, one of the Nordic countries’ biggest banks, halted purchases of Brazilian sovereign debt last year after forest fires flared, putting its roughly 100 million euros (US$112.1 million) of Brazilian government bonds in “quarantine.”
However, Nordea Asset Management head of emerging-market debt Thede Ruest said the firm could go further.
“The next level of escalation from quarantining actually means selling our Brazil government bonds, which could trigger other funds following suit,” Ruest said. “We are disappointed by the lack of progress by the current administration, with deforestation rates continuing to soar ahead of another major fire season.”
Da Costa-Bulthuis of Robeco, which manages at least 3 billion euros in Brazilian equities and up to 5 billion euros when including debt and other assets, declined to comment on specific holdings.
She said the firm could reduce its exposure to Brazil if its environmental record deteriorates further.
Da Costa-Bulthuis, along with Svan and Ruest, expressed alarm about a video of a Brazilian cabinet meeting, made public due to a federal investigation.
In the recording, Brazilian Minister of the Environment Ricardo Salles told Bolsonaro and other ministers that the government should accelerate environmental deregulation while the public is distracted by the current coronavirus pandemic.
“He’s working against the environment. What he said was unacceptable,” Da Costa-Bulthuis said. “If they [the government] will be sensible or not, I think one way to start would be to change the environment minister, because this guy does not have credibility.”
Salles and his press office did not respond to requests for comment on the statement. At the time, the minister said he was only calling for cutting unhelpful bureaucracy that hinders investment.
Bolsonaro last month dispatched the military to combat destruction of the Amazon, although deforestation last month rose again compared with a year earlier for the 13th straight month.
Da Costa-Bulthuis said that the deployment was “the minimum” the government could do and not an adequate replacement for strengthening agencies specialized in environmental enforcement.
“We don’t think they’re doing enough,” she said.
Unless Hollywood movies like Greenland, Deep Impact, and Armageddon have predictive powers and a rogue space rock is heading our way, stopping Chinese Communist Party expansionism is likely to prove the single most challenging and dangerous problem of our lifetimes. How can the United States, Taiwan, and other liberal democracies prepare for and prevent attacks from China? How can Washington bolster Taipei’s confidence when it doesn’t recognize Taiwan as a real country and, so far, lacks the political will to make major adjustments to its ossified China policy and Taiwan policy? How can Taiwan make itself heard on the world stage when
Hypersonic weapons are defined as armaments capable of traveling at speeds faster than Mach 5 and can be broadly classified into two types: hypersonic glide vehicles (HGV) and hypersonic cruise missiles. The former are launched into the upper atmosphere by ballistic missiles. The vehicle is then separated from the booster to maneuver, or glide, toward its target. The latter can be launched from a jet plane or rocket to reach supersonic speed before igniting a scramjet engine to achieve hypersonic speeds. As the US engages in a great-power competition with China and Russia, all three countries are racing to field hypersonic
As a Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) cadet, I frequently get asked how quickly the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might overrun Taiwan if it invaded before 2040. My answer is that the PLA will not be able to take over Taiwan within that time frame, because the more eager the PLA is to complete the task in a short period, the more likely it would fail — and fail big. Having a slim chance of winning is what keeps the PLA from taking action. From time to time, some PLA leaders or keyboard fighters make threats — one of the
The number of people emigrating from Hong Kong has been rapidly increasing, Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department data show, with the territory’s population dropping by 110,000 people from 2019 to this year. China’s imposition of a National Security Law has clearly triggered a massive population outflow. However, not only people but also foreign businesses are leaving Hong Kong. For example, Vanguard Group, the world’s second-largest asset management company, VF Corp and Sony Interactive Entertainment have moved their top regional management from Hong Kong to Singapore. LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, the world’s largest luxury goods company, has also relocated staff