MTV went dark for 8 minutes and 46 seconds. Goldman Sachs pledged US$10 million “to help address racial and economic injustice,” and Nike reworked its well-worn slogan for these troubled times: “For Once, Don’t Do It,” it said.
Major corporations have moved with unusual speed to position their brands and messaging for the US’ latest crisis over racism and police brutality.
Since May 25, when the death of George Floyd at the hands of white police officers ignited protests across the country, all but a handful of the 50 largest companies in the US have responded publicly to the events.
Illustration: Mountain People
While their responses have, predictably, varied from business to business and industry to industry, one thing is clear: Silence on race is no longer an option. Many companies worry they might fall out of step with customers and employees if they do not take a public stand.
Yet each social media post can set off an online skirmish that mimics the battle lines being drawn across the US as people struggle with rapidly changing events and entrenched fears. Unlike syrupy messages in support of nurses and essential workers fighting the COVID-19 pandemic or a call for unity after Sept. 11, 2001, there is no happy medium for a position on white privilege.
“The rule of the day is just do it,” Karen Boykin-Towns, senior counselor at public relations firm Sard Verbinnen & Co, said about engaging on the issue. “It’s about social responsibility, it’s about corporate responsibility.”
Black Americans, already ravaged by a fatal virus that is two or three times more deadly in their communities, have spread the protests from the streets to social media, contending that corporate silence is the same as complicity.
Their messages have been blasted out under hashtags such as #WeAreDoneDying, urging companies and others to show support for changes.
While Starbucks, JPMorgan Chase and others responded after teenager Michael Brown was shot in 2014 by police in Ferguson, Missouri — sparking protests that spread to other cities — engagement this time has been exponentially bigger.
That is partly because the protests have been more widespread and also because battles over LGBT rights, the polarization created by US President Donald Trump and the congressional gridlock on social issues were already pushing businesses to fill the void.
Among the 50 largest US companies, all but Berkshire Hathaway, Costco Wholesale, Exxon Mobil and Nvidia had as of Thursday last week made some sort of public statement in support of black Americans.
Almost US$1.1 billion has been pledged to Black Lives Matter, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), community rebuilding or outreach — and this does not include monetary promises without a set price tag.
Goldman Sachs chief executive officer David Solomon released a transcript on LinkedIn of a May 28 voicemail he sent employees.
“I am horrified by continued attacks against the black community, highlighted most recently in the US with the deaths of Ahmaud Arbery and George Floyd, and with what Christian Cooper experienced in Central Park in New York City this past Monday,” he said.
On Wednesday last week, the company announced the Goldman Sachs Fund for Racial Equity “to support the vital work of leading organizations addressing racial injustice, structural inequity and economic disparity.”
“The fund will be launched with US$10 million from Goldman Sachs Gives, a donor-advised fund that allows the firm and its current and retired senior employees to direct grants to support underserved communities around the world,” the company said.
ViacomCBS on Monday last week turned 10 of its networks — including MTV, Nickelodeon and Black Entertainment Television — dark for 8 minutes and 46 seconds, matching the amount of time police officer Derek Chauvin kneeled on Floyd’s neck.
Ice cream maker Ben & Jerry’s said that Trump must disavow white supremacists and urged government leaders to call for unity, pass new laws to bolster civil rights protections and conduct a federal study on reparations that would close the book on slavery.
Apple chief executive officer Tim Cook called for justice to help Minneapolis heal.
Intel pledged US$1 million for social justice causes, while Microsoft used its Twitter page to promote perspectives from its black employees.
Other organizations have directed contributions to Floyd’s family: UnitedHealth Group created an education fund for his children, along with donating US$10 million toward helping the businesses and people of Minneapolis and St Paul.
The Bank of America’s US$1 billion commitment over four years is the biggest pledge to date, with funds going mainly toward communities of color — those hardest hit by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Target — which closed six of its hometown Minneapolis stores because of damage and looting — said that it would distribute food and other supplies and help local small businesses rebuild through grants from its nonprofit foundation.
Employees affected by store closures would be paid for as many as 14 days of scheduled shifts.
Vail Resorts chief executive officer Rob Katz said that his company and industry have not done enough to improve racial diversity in skiing, calling his own lack of action a “personal failing.”
“As much as I have been saddened seeing these acts of racism across our country, I am also confronted by the fact that our company and our sport are overwhelmingly white, with incredibly low representation from people of color,” Katz wrote in a memo this week.
The reactions played out in fits and starts at some companies. L’Oreal’s Maybelline on May 30 posted support for “inclusivity, equality and justice,” and promised donations to the NAACP after a night of unrest that left many US cities smoldering.
Urban Decay, another of the French giant’s brands, followed that evening with a message of financial support for Black Lives Matter.
It was not until two days later, after nail-care brand Essie put out a morning tweet, that the namesake L’Oreal Paris USA brand posted a corporate message.
A company memo reviewed by Bloomberg showed that L’Oreal USA chief executive officer Stephane Rinderknech let each brand make its own decision about whether to weigh in.
Garnier and Giorgio Armani posted black squares for #BlackOutTuesday on social media.
As of Wednesday last week, Lancome and It Cosmetics — two of L’Oreal’s most followed brands on Twitter — did not have a visible statement.
“Some brands may be afraid, but this feels totally different” from the aftermath of other times when black men and women have been killed by police, said Tiffany McGhee, chief executive officer and cochief investment officer of institutional investment services at Momentum Advisors, which follows retail and other consumer-facing companies.
Brands that are silent have more to risk than those that weigh in, because “people are at home and watching.”
The reactions have not all been positive. L’Oreal detractors brought up past complaints about its own racism when it fired a transgender model in 2017 for saying she was tired of the racial violence of white people — “Yes, ALL white people.” — on Facebook.
Ben & Jerry’s faced a backlash from some who claimed it was sowing racial division by calling attention to white supremacy.
PepsiCo’s statement on Twitter offering support for George Floyd was deflated somewhat by a social media post that resurfaced ridicule of a 2017 Kendall Jenner commercial in which the reality star seemingly ends a protest by handing a police officer a Pepsi.
Some companies that want to show their support might have awkward moments if the racial makeup of their c-suite or progress of their corporate culture does not match their aspirations, said Boykin-Towns, who is also vice chairman of the NAACP board.
Nike was criticized for its own employee relations record and mostly male, white leadership.
That discomfort could mean businesses would want to stay on the sidelines, wary of digging up past controversy, Boykin-Towns said.
Instead they should seek partners who can help them craft their response.
If they are “sincere and authentic” in outrage and willingness to fix what is wrong within their own companies, “that will be appreciated, that will be rewarded,” she said. “There’s no hiding, and I think most CEOs see that.”
Far fewer chief executive officers are consistently activist than might be supposed, with less than 30 percent of those at S&P 500 companies and even fewer at smaller businesses taking controversial positions, according to a 2018 Stanford University survey that tried to quantify the risks and rewards of executive activism.
Even though it is guaranteed some will be upset regardless of how they act, Kim Wright-Violich, a managing partner at consultant Tideline, who was an adviser on the Stanford report, said that pressure is growing for them to take a stand amid the likelihood consumers will notice if they do not.
“Brands should know that people are watching,” said Rashad Robinson, president of Color of Change, the civil rights organization formed after Hurricane Katrina to advocate for political rights of black Americans. “People are going to hold companies accountable, not just for what they say but for what they do.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry