The wave of anger and indignation sweeping the US in response to George Floyd’s death at the hands of a Minneapolis policeman exposes the myriad contradictions of US society.
With a presidential election less than six months away, the nation is gripped by despair and violent polarization. Yet, through the triple crisis of COVID-19, economic depression, mass protests and rioting there are enormous potential opportunities.
Since the US ceased to be a middle-class society, starting in the early 1980s, it has been incapable of thriving. Without a full-fledged welfare state, it has consistently failed to adapt to a fundamental shift in its founding paradigm.
Its Athenian-inspired political system was built for a society that treated everyone within the circle of enfranchisement as roughly equal, while excluding many others whom it deemed “less equal” (to borrow from George Orwell’s biting description of Bolshevism). The out-groups included women, Native Americans, African Americans, Hispanics, Asian Americans and many others.
As a result of these founding conditions, the US political system has long proved ill-equipped to retool its safety net, let alone its broader social contract.
To take the most recent example, consider then-US president Barack Obama’s attempts to fix the country’s deeply flawed and dysfunctional healthcare system.
Although the Affordable Care Act was signed into law in 2010, it contained many loopholes and half-measures, and has since been systematically undermined by US President Donald Trump’s administration.
Race is a central flashpoint in the US’ political evolution. Racial disparities have always underscored why the social contract needs to be expanded to beyond the fully employed white males of yesteryear.
However, the persistence of these disparities indicates that there are immense hurdles standing in the way of change.
Trump’s cynical effort to stoke racial resentment in response to the current protests is emblematic of the deeper problem. So, too, was the Democratic Party’s primary, which quickly winnowed out all candidates of color.
Race is a key factor not just in demands for reparations for slavery, but also in debates about universal health insurance and childcare, tuition-free public higher education, the minimum wage, immigration, gun control and Electoral College reform.
All of these issues touch on the fundamental question at the heart of the US’ political identity: Can the country’s original sin (slavery, followed by Jim Crow) be expiated without a proper welfare state?
The outpouring of frustration and anger following Floyd’s death has once again brought these questions into sharper focus.
Over the past year, polls have consistently shown that Americans support proposals to expand the safety net, tighten gun control and provide tuition-free college. They also increasingly accept that African Americans continue to bear the costs of systemic racism, from red-lining of neighborhoods and workplace discrimination to mass incarceration and abuse at the hands of police.
The current explosion of rage would solidify these shifts in sentiment, whatever the electoral consequences.
The same is true of the COVID-19 pandemic and the broader economic collapse. The racial and socioeconomic disparities revealed by both crises have led political leaders, experts and commentators from left to moderate right to agree that the US’ safety net is in tatters.
From insufficient testing and inadequate supplies of personal protective equipment to the disproportionately higher mortality rate among African Americans, the pandemic has laid bare the weaknesses of the US healthcare system.
At the same time, the economic debacle has highlighted the shortcomings of US unemployment insurance and other social programs, as well as a lack of coordination between federal, state and local governments.
Just as the pandemic has demonstrated the efficiency of the German, Scandinavian and even French safety nets, it has exposed the gaping holes in the US system.
Owing to the triple crisis posed by the pandemic, depression and civil unrest, there is a growing awareness among Democrats that beating Trump in November will not be enough.
The focus groups that Joe Biden, the party’s presumptive nominee, has set up, and his campaign’s ongoing discussions with potential running mates, all point to a realization that the crisis is even deeper than originally anticipated, and would require radical change.
Biden might not be the ideal candidate to mobilize and excite young black and Hispanic voters, but he is certainly capable of leading the kind of coalition needed to defeat Trump and launch a New Deal-like overhaul of US social, economic and political structures.
Americans might not want “socialism,” but they will no longer be content with a “return to normalcy” (Biden’s primary-season slogan, which he would have to discard).
Former British prime minister Winston Churchill’s aphorism about not letting a good crisis go to waste is relevant once again. With the COVID-19 death toll above 100,000, 40 million unemployed and another black man killed by a white cop, the US’ crises are multiplying.
For now, the country is beset not just by protests and rioting over police abuses, but also by a resurgent white supremacist “alt-right.” The underlying crises would come to a head politically on election day.
Not since 1932 has the US been more in need of radical change and sound leadership.
Jorge Castaneda, a former foreign minister of Mexico, is a professor at New York University and author of the forthcoming America Through Foreign Eyes.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Lockheed Martin on Tuesday responded to concerns over delayed shipments of F-16V Block 70 jets, saying it had added extra shifts on its production lines to accelerate progress. The Ministry of National Defense on Monday said that delivery of all 66 F-16V Block 70 jets — originally expected by the end of next year — would be pushed back due to production line relocations and global supply chain disruptions. Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that Taiwan and the US are working to resolve the delays, adding that 50 of the aircraft are in production, with 10 scheduled for flight
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
RSS