The news is awash with stories of regional tensions, with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) conducting military drills targeted at taking the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea, the regular passage of US Navy vessels through the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea, China passing new national security legislation throwing Hong Kong into turmoil and the COVID-19 pandemic sending the global economy into a tailspin, among others.
Meanwhile, Taiwan is dealing with incidents related to military discipline that have led to concerns over the preparedness of the military.
In her inaugural address, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on May 20 mentioned the importance of education and training within the military, and how her administration would focus on ensuring that leaders “foster a modern management system that emphasizes professionalism” so that the military would regain the respect of Taiwanese.
In terms of military education and training, it is no small matter.
The military has tended to gloss over the importance of education. Senior leaders at military academies generally only have their experience in the ranks to recommend them, with only a scant few having done any academic research or published any papers on military matters throughout their careers in the armed forces. The majority are strangers to academia.
If the leaders within the hallowed halls of military academies have precious little academic background, there are bound to be problems with leadership principles and capability.
This is different in Japan. The president of Japan’s National Defense Academy has a doctorate under his belt. As a professor, he is suitable to head an academic institution. If Japan can do this, surely Taiwan can do it, too.
Another issue is the deeply subjective decisionmaking on which promotions within the armed forces are frequently based. Military personnel are often promoted for who they are rather than for what they can do, and this leads to resentment and low morale within the military.
An officer with more than 20 years of service experience said that many personnel decisions were based on subjective factors, with legal requirements playing but a token role.
This causes military personnel to lose incentive and motivation, and it of course adversely affects their work attitude. However, this is not merely a loss for individuals, it is a loss for the armed forces as a whole.
The military is facing more scrutiny and higher expectations than it used to, and in a rapidly changing environment, it is important that it is seen to be fit for purpose. This is the only way that the military is going to be able to win back public trust.
The military is only able to make improvements if it manages to reform the way education and training of its leadership is conducted.
Education and training are going to be important sources of military capability in future conflicts, and personnel must be the backbone of this. Given the rapid expansion of the PLA’s might, it is of major importance that Taiwan’s military keeps pace.
Chang Yan-ting is an adjunct professor at National Defense University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under