On Jan. 15, it seemed like the US and China had avoided a quick descent into a new Cold War.
In Washington, US President Donald Trump declared that “our relationship with China is the best it’s ever been” while signing a preliminary trade deal that “unifies the countries.”
The pact between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) raised hopes that the world’s predominant superpower could peacefully resolve differences with a rising China.
Illustration: Mountain People
That same day, health officials in the central Chinese city of Wuhan acknowledged that they could not rule out human-to-human transmission of a mysterious new pneumonia that had already sickened 41 people.
A man who had visited Wuhan also arrived home in Washington state carrying the deadly pathogen — the first confirmed US case of the disease that would become known as COVID-19.
Four months later, the virus has prompted the worst global health crisis in at least a century, killing more than 300,000 people and plunging the global economy into a deep recession. The pandemic has also revived all the worst-case scenarios about US-China ties, edging them closer to confrontation than at any point since the two sides established relations four decades ago.
From supply chains and visas to cyberspace and Taiwan, the world’s two largest economies are escalating disputes across several fronts that never really fell silent.
Trump is even expressing frustration with the trade pact, one of few commitments preventing the rhetorical fights from spilling into the real world.
On May 7, Trump said he does not want to speak with Xi and the US would “save US$500 billion” if it cut off ties with China.
In response, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs urged the US to drop “the Cold War mentality” and cooperate in the fight against the virus.
“The stable development of relations between China and the United States is in the fundamental interests of the people of the two countries and is also conducive to world peace and stability,” ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian (趙立堅) told a regular news briefing in Beijing.
The feud is likely to get noisier before the US election in November: Trump is increasingly blaming China for the virus turmoil as it undermines his chances at victory, while the presumptive Democratic nominee, former US vice president Joe Biden, the US Congress and several states also join in.
Meanwhile, Xi’s government has unleashed nationalist forces against the US as slowing exports and rising joblessness push the country toward its worst downturn in generations.
“The COVID-19 attacks on both China and the US seem to have pushed the deterioration of bilateral relations to the breaking point,” said Gao Zhikai (高志凱), a onetime interpreter for China’s former paramount leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平). “Never since the normalization of relations in 1979 have China-US relations been as dangerous and as confrontational as today.”
While the trade pact for now lowers the risk of new tariffs, most other disputes between the two sides are the same as or worse than during the depths of the conflict a year ago.
Trump and his top aides have infuriated China with a daily barrage of criticism, including unsubstantiated claims that the virus escaped from a Wuhan lab, that Beijing is hording medical supplies and that the country’s hackers are probing US organizations for vaccine research.
At the same time, Chinese diplomats and state media have promoted conspiracy theories that US Army athletes introduced the virus to Wuhan and accused “certain US politicians” of trying to shift the blame for the world’s biggest coronavirus case tally.
They have denounced Trump administration officials as liars, even calling US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo “evil” on an evening news program.
The crisis has prompted hawks on both sides to throw around threats that would have rarely been taken seriously during the decades when most in Washington advocated engagement with Beijing.
‘ACT OF WAR’
Key Republican lawmakers have proposed canceling more than US$1 trillion in US debt held by China — a move Gao compared to an “act of war” — while the chief editor of the Chinese Communist Party’s Global Times newspaper suggested more than tripling the country’s relatively small stockpile of about 300 nuclear warheads.
The pandemic has also revived tensions in old disputes, such as the status of Taiwan, which China has blocked from participating in WHO events.
Last month, the top US health official held a rare telephone call with his Taiwanese counterpart, and two weeks ago the US Senate passed legislation seeking Taiwan’s inclusion in WHO meetings while a US destroyer sailed through the Taiwan Strait.
The flow of information between the two countries has perhaps suffered the most immediate impact, with dozens of journalists expelled from both countries in recent months.
Beijing last week warned of further retaliation after the US reduced visas for Chinese media staff to 90 days.
The conflict has led some Chinese insiders to play down the prospects of another deal with Trump, who many in Beijing once viewed with relief as a pragmatist who would not be too concerned about human rights.
Shi Yinhong (時殷弘), an adviser to China’s Cabinet and an international relations professor at Renmin University in Beijing, argued in a recent speech that the country should tone down the rhetoric in the hopes of preserving a post-election relationship with the Democrats, who are emphasizing Trump’s responsibility for the outbreak.
“A Biden presidency will be less ideological and more practical,” said Susan Shirk, the chair of the University of California San Diego’s 21st Century China Center and author of China: Fragile Superpower. “Instead of confronting China across the board with the goal being unclear, a Biden administration will impose pressure in some areas, and remain tough in others — like national security and technology — with the goal being to negotiate changes in Chinese policies.”
Much depends on whether Trump’s “phase one” trade deal with Xi holds through election day.
The president has shown increasing impatience with China, with S&P Global Ratings predicting that the country was unlikely to meet pledges to buy an additional US$200 billion of US products this year and next year.
Trump and Xi probably have less appetite for a tariff war as the pandemic pushes their economies into historic crises.
Among the biggest threat to both leaders is a sustained rise in joblessness that could prompt political unrest. More than 84,000 people have died from the coronavirus in the US, making it the worst-hit country in the world.
James Green, a senior adviser for geopolitical consulting firm McLarty Associates, pointed to a phone call earlier this month between top US and Chinese trade negotiators as evidence that both sides want to preserve the deal.
China on May 8 started allowing imports of US farm products from barley to blueberries under the phase-one deal.
“You will see increased volatility in US-China relations, with both sides playing to domestic audiences,” said Green, who was previously a US trade official in Beijing. “That said, in my view there are signs that a working relationship can be maintained.”
‘WORST STATE IN DECADES’
Still, each new battle only deepens the suspicion between the two powers. The US has used the supply chain disruptions caused by the virus to accelerate the push to move US production out for the country.
In Washington, calls are rising to rescind Hong Kong’s special trading status as Beijing seeks to suppress calls for greater democracy.
On the morning of May 7, Trump said he was “looking at” Chinese companies that trade on the NYSE and NASDAQ exchanges but do not follow US accounting rules.
The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, which oversees a retirement-savings plan for federal workers, delayed a move that would have allocated billions of dollars to invest in Chinese companies.
Later on that day, the US Senate gave unanimous consent to legislation that would impose sanctions on Chinese officials over human rights abuses against Muslim minorities.
The Global Times on May 8 said that China was “considering punitive countermeasures” against US officials such as Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, who is suing China for compensation, and Republican US senators Tom Cotton and Josh Hawley.
The paper, citing people close to the matter, said business between China and states taking such action could suffer.
Shi said that efforts to decouple the world’s two largest economies appeared “much broader and much less selective” than before, with both sides “prioritizing their domestic issues.”
“China-US relations have descended to the worst state in decades and will only get more tense,” he told Bloomberg News. “So the strategic confrontation will retrench, but the political and ideological tensions are being deliberately heated up.”
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented