The US’ entrenched political divide is now playing out over matters of life and death.
Republican governors, urged on by US President Donald Trump, are taking the first steps toward reopening parts of their states’ economies in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, and without adhering to the president’s own guidelines.
Democratic governors are largely keeping strict stay-at-home orders and nonessential business closures in place, resisting small pockets of Trump-aligned protesters and public pressure from the president.
The fault lines are familiar, exposing many of the same regional and demographic divisions that have increasingly come to define US politics, as well as the stark differences in the ways the parties view the role of government in American life.
Yet the stakes go far beyond the normal risks and rewards of an election cycle, instead putting the health and well-being of millions of Americans in the balance.
“We do imagine that in times of crisis, that will alleviate some of the political divisions we see in normal times, but every time we go through a crisis, small ones and severe ones, the political divisions re-emerge right away,” said Julian Zelizer, a professor of political history at Princeton University.
DIFFERENT APPROACHES
It could be months before the ultimate consequences of the various shutdown and reopen orders are known.
Public health officials concede that no one-size-fits all approach exists, and the decisions being made by states are dependent on factors such as the density of major population areas, the capacity of medical resources and the availability of testing.
Yet there is also an undeniable political tenor to the debate over when and how states should begin easing restrictions. Much of that has been shaped by Trump, who began agitating to reopen businesses almost as soon as they were shuttered, well aware that his re-election prospects in November likely hinge on the strength of the economy.
Democrats say they, too, care about the nation’s economic health and getting millions of Americans back on the job, but most are hewing closely to the warnings of top public health officials, who argue that sending people back to work and into their communities prematurely would lead to more outbreaks of the virus and many more deaths.
“The worst thing would be for us to spike the football and think we are outside of the danger zone and to re-engage and find another peak of COVID-19,” Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer said on Tuesday.
Whitmer’s comments came a day after Republican governors in Georgia, South Carolina and Tennessee — all staunch Trump allies — outlined steps to begin opening businesses within a matter of days.
They are a few steps ahead of other Republican governors who also have moved toward reopening businesses. One exception is Colorado, where Governor Jared Polis, a Democrat, plans to let shelter-in-place orders across the state expire today.
“Every business is essential. Everything people do is essential,” Polis said. “That’s what’s so frustrating, to try to put things in essential and nonessential buckets. Nobody thinks like that and the world doesn’t work like that.”
An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll this month showed that 78 percent of Americans support stay-at-home restrictions to ease the pandemic.
However, politicians in both parties recognize that the public’s patience might wane in the coming weeks and months as more job losses and other economic hardships take hold.
PRESIDENT’S EFFECT
Officially, Trump is leaving the decisions on easing restrictions in the hands of the nation’s governors.
Last week, he unveiled a series of guidelines for the states that recommend reopening sectors of the economy in waves that are correlated with infection rates, as well as robust testing and tracking systems that would allow states to quickly pull back if new outbreaks occur.
However, the president almost immediately undercut his own guidance, exhorting supporters on Twitter to “LIBERATE” some states that do not yet meet conditions for a phased reopening.
All of the states Trump singled out are led by Democratic governors: Michigan, Minnesota and Virginia, where he also linked the issue to gun rights.
None has so far acquiesced to his demands.
The ways Americans are experiencing the pandemic have already been shaped by where they live. Many of the hardest-hit areas, where stay-at-home restrictions have been the tightest, are in dense cities in liberal states, including New York and California. Many less populous states, which tilt conservative, have so far seen lower rates of infection and have often had fewer restrictions.
Yet the virus has not spread along perfectly partisan lines.
Data compiled by Johns Hopkins University showed that the top 15 states by infection and death rate include Democratic-leaning states, Republican-leaning states and states that swing between the two parties in presidential and statewide elections.
Among them: Georgia, which has recorded nearly 20,000 infections and more than 770 deaths.
On Monday, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, a Republican, announced that gyms, hair salons, bowling alleys and other businesses could start opening at the end of this week, with more restrictions to be lifted in coming days.
The decision by Kemp, a stalwart Trump supporter in a state that is moving increasingly to the center, was met with anger by Democrats in the state.
Stacey Abrams, who narrowly lost to Kemp in 2018 and is considered a possible vice presidential pick for presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden, said of the governor’s decision: “Nothing about this makes sense.”
In announcing his decision, Kemp said that Georgia is likely to see an increase in coronavirus infections and deaths as businesses start opening.
The risk, he decided, is worth it.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.