Even as the COVID-19 pandemic rages across the world, it has developed its own geopolitics, with all sorts of conspiracy theories circulating.
China, where the virus struck in Wuhan, a city of 11 million people, took its time to acknowledge its reality.
Indeed when a young Chinese doctor at a Wuhan hospital raised the alert about a new virus circulating, the local authorities forced him to deny it and put him in home detention of sorts. The tragedy of it all is that the doctor himself contracted the virus while working at his hospital and he became a martyr of sorts, paying with his life.
The virus spread fast and the authorities realized the gravity of the situation, and locked down the city, and then extended restrictions to the entire Hubei Province, and between regions. China managed to bring the situation under control after more than 3,000 fatalities and more than 80,000 people infected.
However, the outbreak in China is by no means over. New cases of coronavirus are emerging all the time in China, mainly from those returning from abroad and from asymptomatic patients. However, the situation is not as dire as before.
Even as COVID-19 was raging in China, the Internet was swarming with conspiracy theories. One was that it was a population control scheme, as humans have become too numerous. It was not clear who was actually behind this “population control.” That is the “beauty” of conspiracy theories — they just seem to float on their own. Another one traced the virus to a Chinese biosecurity laboratory, not far from Wuhan, as part of some bioweapon under development. Yet another conspiracy theory, although debunked by the British authorities, attributed it to China’s 5G rollout in the UK.
As far as people know, the virus jumped from wild animals to humans, likely late last year, in the popular Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market of Wuhan.
Chinese sources allege that the virus was brought to Wuhan by the US military. It is not clear how this was done.
However, in the world of conspiracy theorists, one outlandish theory is as good as another.
In the world of US President Donald Trump, when he finally realized the enormity of COVID-19, with the US becoming a major pandemic epicenter, overtaking China, it simply became the “Chinese virus.” When pointed out its racist connotation, he simply said that it came from China, stating it as a simple fact.
In the meantime, having managed the crisis, China is feeling confident enough to use it as a tool for soft power diplomacy. It has sent masks, protective gear and other equipment to seriously affected countries such as Italy.
Its significance should not be lost, because it is the US and Western countries, with huge resources, that used to help in times of epidemics in poorer countries.
With the US now seemingly in a huge health crisis and needing help from others, China would appear to have overtaken the US, at least with regard to the coronavirus crisis.
It is reportedly delivering medical equipment, such as masks, protective equipment and coronavirus test kits, to many countries, although some of the test kits have been found to be defective.
However, no matter how much China might want the world to forget that the coronavirus started there, it might not be that easy, because, elements in the West would not let it be forgotten. It will be another exercise in power politics with the US and its allies putting China on the spot.
At the same time, on the Chinese side, the US would continue to be blamed for starting the pandemic in the first place. And the partisans on both sides would keep pushing their respective narratives.
For instance, conservative London think tank the Henry Jackson Society believes that China should be sued under international law for at least £3.2 trillion (US$4 trillion) for initially trying to cover up the pandemic, causing so many deaths and damaging the economies of the affected countries.
China is projecting its relative success in containing the virus as an example of the effectiveness of its system to deal with emergencies and following it up with an efficient delivery of medical equipment to affected countries.
The respective narratives on both sides would continue to be pursued with vigor, thus preventing cooperative action to deal with the tremendous problems in the health sector and economies, which might sink into recession, and even depression.
Sushil Seth is a commentator based in Australia.
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
During an impromptu Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) rally on Tuesday last week to protest what the party called the unfairness of the judicial system, a young TPP supporter said that if Taiwan goes to war, he would “surrender to the [Chinese] People’s Liberation Army [PLA] with unyielding determination.” The rally was held after former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng’s (彭振聲) wife took her life prior to Pong’s appearance in court to testify in the Core Pacific corruption case involving former Taipei mayor and TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). The TPP supporter said President William Lai (賴清德) was leading them to die on