Earl Kerr, a 57-year-old electrical contractor in Jacksonville, Florida, said that he fears for his 80-year-old mother, who entered an assisted living facility just before the COVID-19 pandemic hit the US.
He also said he worries that the tanking economy could sink his small business.
Yet he has faith in US President Donald Trump to handle the crisis. He has heard the widespread criticism that Trump initially did not take the pandemic seriously, that his administration failed to procure vital medical supplies and left overwhelmed states to fend for themselves.
Illustration: Louise Ting
Kerr has a different take.
“He’s not God. He can’t foresee the future or see that the virus can do this or that,” said Kerr, who voted for Trump in 2016 and plans to again in November. “He’s doing the best he can with the information that he gets.”
Continued support from voters such as Kerr could prove critical to Trump’s re-election bid — especially because the regions where the president has drawn support often overlap with those most vulnerable to the pandemic, a Reuters analysis showed.
The analysis found that one in five of Trump’s 2016 voters live in areas where health and economic factors heighten their risks from the coronavirus.
Kerr is among 30 voters interviewed who live in such at-risk metropolitan areas in Florida, Ohio and West Virginia, and who voted for Trump in 2016 or support him now.
The interviews, along with Reuters/Ipsos polling data, show stalwart support among Trump’s political base amid the worst public health crisis in a century, with a rising US death toll, predictions of an economic depression and the US stock market’s biggest first-quarter loss in history.
Yet neither has Trump enjoyed the dramatic gains in popularity that past presidents have sometimes seen during crises, when patriotism often runs high — illustrating a hardening of the bitter partisanship that has been the hallmark of his administration.
Before the pandemic, Trump had trumpeted a soaring economy and record-low unemployment to woo the moderate and independent voters he needs to win the election — especially in key battleground states such as Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Florida.
That pitch evaporated in the pandemic, making perceptions of his emergency response all the more crucial.
Recent polls in Florida and Wisconsin showed Trump trailing former US vice president Joe Biden by between three and six points.
Perceptions of crisis response have had a pivotal effect on the popularity of past presidents. The experience of former US president George W. Bush — the last Republican president, also a polarizing figure — provides a vivid example of partisanship breaking down in some of the nation’s darkest times.
Bush’s approval rating soared to more than 90 percent after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, according to Gallup polling, but that figure fell below 40 percent after Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and bottomed out at 25 percent during the 2008 financial crisis, helping then-Democratic US senator Barack Obama beat the Republican challenger, then-US senator John McCain, in that year’s election.
Trump’s approval rating, by contrast, has remained steady throughout his presidency and has ranged between 40 percent and 44 percent since the onset of the US coronavirus crisis early last month, buoyed by the support of 85 percent of Republicans, a Reuters/Ipsos poll taken on Monday and Tuesday showed.
That job rating makes November’s election highly competitive, experts say, although the political landscape could shift as the pandemic continues to claim lives and jobs.
Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh said that voters have continued to support the president in part because he acted early, in late January, to restrict travel from China and appoint a coronavirus task force.
“He also has an optimistic view of America and wants to get us moving as soon as it is safe, while also listening to the medical experts,” Murtaugh said.
The condemnation of Trump’s response is just as overwhelming among Democrats, nearly 89 percent of whom disapproved of his job performance, little changed from pre-crisis levels, the poll showed.
Independents remained split, with 53 percent disapproving of the president’s performance and 42 percent approving.
Trump trails Biden, the Democratic front-runner, even with the publicity advantage the president now enjoys as he appears in daily briefings, while Biden has isolated himself from the disease in his Delaware home, issuing little-noticed commentary.
Registered voters supported Biden by 43 percent to 37 percent, the poll showed.
Kyle Kondik, a political analyst at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, said that the hyper-partisan divide over Trump limits his political upside and his downside in the crisis.
“People who predict this president will suffer long-term approval dips have been wrong throughout his presidency,” he said.
Nearly all the Trump supporters interviewed said that the media and Democrats are unfairly blaming him for a problem that no one could have predicted.
Several still likened the new coronavirus to a seasonal flu — echoing Trump comments early in the crisis — even after the president’s own characterization of the outbreak had changed and his advisers said that this virus is 10 times more fatal.
The voters interviewed lauded Trump for the US$2.2 trillion rescue package passed by the US Congress. They believe the pandemic’s economic fallout means that the country needs Trump — a businessman — more than ever to steer it out of doldrums.
Many said that he is doing the best possible job in an impossible situation.
“It’s not his fault that this happened,” said Barbara Raccina, 76, of Jacksonville Beach, Florida, who voted for Trump in 2016 and said she will do so again in November. “I think he’s trying to help as much as he can. The rest is up to us to stay indoors.”
Raccina and the other voters interviewed live in areas that supported Trump in 2016 and are especially vulnerable to the pandemic.
The Reuters analysis identified the areas through data from the US Census Bureau, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Reuters examined the percentage of people who smoke, have asthma or other conditions that can raise the risk of dying from COVID-19.
The analysis also factored in economic data including unemployment and the percentage of the local workers in retail who are likely to lose their paychecks in the pandemic as stores close.
John O’Neill, 61, lives in one of those vulnerable regions — Middletown, Ohio, a metropolitan area Trump won with 56 percent of the vote in 2016. Middletown has among the nation’s highest percentage of people who smoke, have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease — a lung disease — or have heart conditions, which are all thought to make COVID-19 more dangerous.
Unemployed, O’Neill hopes to find work in a warehouse — a setting with potentially high virus exposure — and has been diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
He said that he is not concerned about the virus.
“We have 10,000 people die each year of the flu, and they don’t shut businesses down,” he said.
O’Neill said that he takes comfort from the medical experts advising Trump, such as US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease official, who appears alongside the president at televised briefings.
Fauci has become something of a cult hero — often praised by commentators with media outlets the president blasts as liberal-leaning because he has publicly contradicted Trump’s assurances that the pandemic is under control.
O’Neill views Fauci as one of the president’s trusted advisers.
“If Fauci and them are telling him: ‘No, we shouldn’t be doing this,’ I’m sure Trump will listen to them,” he said.
With the crisis still in its early days, Trump’s supporters are mindful of the risk that supporters’ confidence in his crisis response could fade if death tolls mount and stocks continue to tumble.
None of the voters who spoke to Reuters have yet lost a family member to the virus. Compared with other parts of the US, there have been few confirmed cases in the parts of Florida, Ohio, and West Virginia that Reuters examined, in part because fewer tests are being taken in those areas.
Out of the 30 Trump voters, only one said that their support has been shaken by the president’s pandemic response — a registered Republican in Cincinnati in his 30s, who asked not to be named.
After the first US case was reported in January, Trump repeatedly insisted it was nothing to worry about and would disappear “like a miracle,” he said, adding that he is considering voting for Biden.
As recently as late last month, Trump suggested scaling back coronavirus restrictions by Easter to revive the economy, before eventually extending social distancing guidelines through this month.
Another voter who supported the 2016 Democratic presidential candidate, former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton, said she plans to back Trump this time.
Amy Frasure, 32, of southern Ohio’s Lawrence County, runs an advertising agency across the border in West Virginia.
It makes sense that Trump has provided a more upbeat assessment than state governors, who have to raise the alarm to effectively deal with public health and economic disasters on the front lines, she said.
Trump’s job is “to make us more comfortable with the fact that there’s something crazy going on,” she said.
Some of those who continue to support Trump said that the president could have taken a more serious tone on the pandemic.
“It bothers me a little when [Trump] says everyone should be back to work by Easter, business booming, things like that, but then ... I think he is probably just trying to give our nation hope,” said Mary Cogan, 52, vice chairperson of the Republican Party in Lawrence County.
Cogan, who called Trump’s overall crisis response “awesome,” said that every local Republican she knows remains steadfast in their support for him.
She expects the county, where 70 percent of people supported Trump in 2016, to back him again.
“He will reign here in Lawrence County,” she said.
Additional reporting by Simon Lewis and Elizabeth Culliford
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
RSS