News reports out of Taipei suggest my long-time friend President Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) is ailing. So I want to take this opportunity to share some personal thoughts on the role of this great Taiwan figure of the past century.
First, some basic facts. Lee was born in Taiwan in January, 1923, grew up during the Japanese occupation, and studied at Kyoto University during the war years. I would characterize him as a Japanophile, based on many discussions we had over the years. President Lee felt he had gotten the opportunity to get a first-class education in Kyoto. Even though he lost a brother in the war, I never detected animosity toward the former colonial power. In fact, when I visited him in Wai Shuang Hsi (外雙溪) during his retirement, he would proudly give me a tour of his extensive library. Lee boasted of his huge collection of Japanese books, covering the spectrum from economics and politics to literature and culture. It is said that Japanese rivaled Taiwanese as his first language, and well ahead of Mandarin. That alone could account for the mainland’s longstanding animosity toward President Lee.
Lee was a polyglot before that word became popular. He studied agricultural economics at Cornell University in the US, earning a PhD from that prestigious Ivy League University. He was an astute economist and made many contributions to Taiwan’s agricultural and economic development over the years, both as a scholar and a politician.
More significantly, Lee played a pivotal role in the democratization of Taiwan. As Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) successor, he carefully propelled the island nation toward the first free and fair national elections in its history. He also became the first Taiwan leader to voluntarily step down and transfer power to his freely elected successor, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), in 2000. I had the honor, as AIT Deputy Director, to attend the ceremony when Lee stepped down.
Thereafter I made it a point, first as Deputy Director, and again when I returned as Director from 2006-9, of visiting Mr. Lee, either in his suburban Taipei home or sometimes the home he kept south of Taipei. He was always gracious and astute in his commentary. I must admit, by his choice our conversations often shifted uncomfortably from Mandarin to English and back again, occasionally making it difficult to elicit all the nuances of this cultivated man’s thinking.
Among my many interactions with President Lee, I think none was more dramatic than in the summer of 1999, when in an interview with a German newspaper, he spoke of a potential “state-to-state relationship” between Taiwan and the mainland. I was Acting Director of AIT at the time, and the storm this kicked up in China and Washington came as something of a surprise to many observers. Beijing, which had long been hostile to Lee, orchestrated a firestorm, suggesting this was nearly tantamount to an act of war. President Clinton in Washington, already engaged in a gradual post-Tiananmen rapprochement with the mainland, sent me stiff talking points to deliver.
Some of my conversations with then President Lee were conducted one-on-one, without interpreter or notetaker, so I could be blunt without forcing him to lose face before others. But my goal was always to avoid embarrassing or humiliating the elected leader of Taiwan, while at the same time making it clear we needed to work together to ratchet down the cross-strait tension this had kicked up. Looking back, I believe Lee was genuinely surprised by the ruckus this had fomented. With the frequent support of his Secretary General of the National Security Council, Ting Mao-shih (丁懋時), we worked out public statements that over time helped to defuse the situation.
Lee and I shared the Episcopalian faith, and I saw in him a devout and humble Christian who understood his obligation to both the secular and spiritual worlds. He often told me he hoped to preach again when he retired from politics. I suspect he did so, though I cannot document this assumption.
I believe it is accurate to term Mr. Lee one of the leading founders of modern Taiwan. Taking his cue from his mentor, President Chiang Ching-kuo, Lee skillfully led Taiwan into the community of democratic nations. Taiwan’s successful democratization represented one of the earliest such transitions in the East Asian region. His unparalleled example of stepping down from the Presidency ended decades of “authoritarian rule until death” that had preceded him.
Though perhaps he was occasionally a bit clumsy in his execution, Lee shepherded Taiwan’s transition into the modern free and open democratic society we all know today. This involved leading his own party, the Kuomintang, despite intense internal opposition. Lee later broke with the KMT and created his own party, but by then he was in retirement and less of a player than he had been during his twelve years as the island’s President.
We have now witnessed three successive heirs to the Lee tradition in Taiwan politics, from both major political parties. Chen Shui-bian, Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) all owe a debt to President Lee for the high example he set for democratic leadership in Taiwan.
In sum, Lee Teng-hui is one of the key founders of today’s prosperous and democratic Taiwan, a country that is the marvel of observers throughout Asia and the world. I salute him for his unparalleled contributions to the modern and self-confident Taiwan of today!
Ambassador Stephen M. Young (ret.) lived in Kaohsiung as a boy over 50 years ago, and served in AIT four times: as a young consular officer (1981-’82), as a language student (1989-’90), as Deputy Director (1998-2001) and as Director (2006-’9). He visits often and writes regularly about Taiwan matters. Young was also US Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan and Consul General to Hong Kong during his 33-year career as a foreign service officer. He has a BA from Wesleyan University and a PhD from the University of Chicago.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry