As Serbia’s EU neighbors closed their borders and halted many medical exports, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic made an appeal.
“Serbia now turns its eyes to China,” he said. “All my personal hopes are focused and directed toward China and its president.”
As the world heads into uncharted territory amid the COVID-19 outbreak, it is undergoing stark and dramatic geopolitical shifts.
Assumptions over globalization and free movement have been torn up overnight. In their haste to address the outbreak, the vast majority of nations have been focused heavily within their borders. Structures such as the EU and UN that had been expected to be at the center of response to crises have been largely ignored.
Having managed to get much of its domestic outbreak under control, Beijing is now unambiguously positioning itself to build new friends and influence. That has included the shipment of medical supplies and small numbers of experts to affected European states, including Italy, France and Spain.
Russia, meanwhile, is also clearly watching closely, its media outlets vigorously broadcasting details of what it claims is a flawed and sometimes chaotic Western response.
Some international cooperation is clearly taking place — for example, to keep limited goods flowing across the EU, despite the lockdown.
However, even the battle for a vaccine is increasingly portrayed in terms of national competition rather than cooperation.
If headlines from major English-language outlets in both countries are any guide, the crisis has further damaged already difficult relations between China and the US. US President Donald Trump has clearly infuriated Beijing with his repeated references to the disease as a “Chinese virus,” comments he has said were a response to suggestions from a Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman earlier this month that the disease had in fact originated in the US.
Beijing has largely avoided repeating that comment since, but if anything Trump has continued to double down on his rhetoric.
These multiple geopolitical battlefronts have many strands, few receiving much attention against the backdrop to the wider crisis.
Iran, among the most-affected countries, finds itself in a particularly complex position. It is lobbying furiously — albeit unsuccessfully — for the US to soften its sanctions to help it tackle the outbreak, even as its proxy forces gain influence against the US’ allies in Iraq, Yemen and elsewhere.
Relations with China and Russia remain extremely hard to predict. Last week, China’s Global Times reported that Chinese fighter jets had made a show of force near Taiwan, while threatening potential electronic warfare or other unconventional attacks against US ships if they continued to probe waters the Chinese have claimed in the South China Sea.
Such rhetoric seems to have been scaled back, for now at least — but aggressive nationalism in multiple locations is at least one potential outcome of the crisis.
What is clear across the board is that almost every nation has looked to seal its borders against population moves from the outside world — and that in many cases, the virus has also exacerbated pre-existing racism and xenophobia.
Simultaneously, and paradoxically, nations such as Serbia have also become more aware of their dependence on the outside world, for economic and basic human needs.
That points to a much larger paradox from this crisis. In some respects, the global system has proved much more vulnerable than many anticipated.
However, in other ways, it is demonstrating impressive levels of resilience. For all the economic shock of hundreds of millions of people ceasing travel and working from home, food supplies and particularly communications are broadly holding up.
Huge swathes of the planet are locked down, but people are still talking to each other with relative ease.
What is happening is a challenge for globalization on a scale not previously seen — as well as an experience being simultaneously shared across the planet in ways that are at least equally unusual.
Who wins and loses from that is a very open question, but what is clear is that those contests are already under way.
Peter Apps, a former Reuters reporter who is now a columnist for the agency, writes on international affairs, globalization, conflict and other issues. He is founder and executive director of the Project for Study of the 21st Century, a non-national, non-partisan, non-ideological think tank. The opinions expressed here are those of the author.
Since COVID-19 broke out in Taiwan, there has been a fair amount of news regarding discrimination and “witch hunts” against medical personnel, people under self-quarantine and other targets, such as the students of a school where an infection was discovered. Quarantine breakers are almost certainly on the loose and it is only natural for people to be vigilant. One in Chiayi was found by accident at a traffic stop because his helmet was not fastened. However, those who follow the rules by quarantining themselves should be encouraged to keep up the good work in a difficult situation, instead of being
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) has said that there is a huge difference between Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan along the edges of its airspace and invading Taiwan’s airspace. He also said that whether it is US or Chinese aircraft flying along or encircling Taiwan’s airspace, there is no legal basis to say that such actions imply a clear provocation of Taiwan, and asked the Ministry of National Defense not to mislead the public. People who hear this might think that it is not a very Taiwanese thing to say. US military activity in the vicinity of Taiwan
As the nation welcomes home Taiwanese who had been stranded in China’s Hubei Province — arguably one of the most dangerous places on Earth since the novel coronavirus outbreak began in its capital, Wuhan, late last year — problems surrounding the “quasi-charter flights” that brought them back have been largely overlooked. The media used the term to describe the two flights dispatched by Taiwan’s state-run China Airlines because they do not count as charter flights. Taiwanese wanting to board those flights had to travel — most likely by train — more than 1,000km from Hubei to Shanghai Pudong International Airport
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist