In Hong Kong, bankers have learned to win stock offerings by video chat, and Morgan Stanley is hosting a virtual meeting for 1,000-plus attendees. At Swiss giant UBS Group, wealth management executives have realized trips to see clients were not as crucial as thought. In California, an investor in hedge funds said he was pleasantly surprised by how much faster he can confer with them remotely.
Virtual finance might far outlast the coronavirus.
Around the world, there are early signs that some of the emergency measures Wall Street is rolling out to keep employees safe in a pandemic would become a lasting practice in an industry that has long mythologized the handshake. That is likely to hearten working parents who have struggled to persuade managers to let them log in from home, as well as many younger recruits at ease doing things digitally.
Much of the positive reception comes from Asia, where the virus began wreaking havoc months ago, forcing bankers indoors. They predict colleagues in other countries will embrace the changes too, starting with sales and trading, as the disease spreads, and the industry gets more comfortable with using video chats and related technology.
“The outbreak has created the urgency to try out new ideas,” Morgan Stanley’s head of Asia institutional equity distribution Mehdee Reza said.
He oversees the firm’s annual investor summit in Hong Kong this week. Registrations jumped 50 percent from last year after the event moved online, with the number of participating companies topping initial estimates fourfold.
The New York-based bank has moved other events focused on European and Indian financial companies online, too. The latter also saw registrants surge.
The Hong Kong summit has now attracted a number of registrants from outside Asia for the first time, including several from Qatar, Canada and France, Reza said.
UBS’ travel costs for Asia last month plunged 90 percent after the outbreak restricted movement, one person familiar with the matter said.
Now, local executives are discussing whether a long-term shift toward remote meetings is viable for bankers who cover the sprawling region, they said.
The firm’s dealmakers have completed at least five pitch meetings on about US$2 billion of stock sales with corporate clients via Skype and Zoom as they dialed in from home or from separate rooms, the people said.
Citigroup bankers have been pitching via video conference on five to 10 transactions a week this year across mergers and acquisitions, equity and debt issuance, said Jan Metzger, head of Asia-Pacific banking, capital markets and advisory.
“With today’s technology you can interact quicker with a client than ever before and this could be a model for the future even when this situation resolves itself,” Metzger said.
Back at UBS’ headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland, wealth management leaders are considering eliminating a lot of travel they were doing too, according to a person with knowledge of their thinking.
Yet in both regions, executives are still willing to fly to clients who prefer it, or for certain business that must be conducted in person.
In New York and London, traders and salespeople are just getting set up in dens or at dining tables for the long haul. Behind the scenes, some already are grumbling about piecemeal access to the resources in the office.
However, among them are also parents and others who have been arguing for years that it is possible to handle transactions remotely. This might be their chance to prove it can be done.
Michael Rosen, a Los Angeles-based investor in hedge funds, said that he is enjoying the efficiency. Instead of spending time traveling to meetings, he is using it for more conversations via video conferencing programs such as Zoom.
To be sure, there are times when seeing someone face-to-face is critical, such as when making gut checks before allocating millions of US dollars to a fund manager, he said.
“We will return, one day, to in-person meetings, but video technology is here to stay and will only grow in importance,” he said. “I suspect it is now a core feature of how we will work in the future.”
It is not just small gatherings. Manulife Financial organized a virtual town hall for 800 staff in Hong Kong and has been sharing its experience with its offices in the US and Canada.
Vanguard Group’s chief economist for the Asia-Pacific region has been holding Webcasts for clients to discuss the outlook for the economy and markets.
Even the crucially face-to-face world of recruiting has temporarily moved virtual, said Ilana Weinstein, the founder and chief executive officer of Wall Street headhunter IDW Group, which counts some of the world’s biggest hedge funds as clients.
The market’s swings are stirring up demand for hedge fund managers who can make money in times like these, said Weinstein, who instituted a 3m distance policy before taking her meetings virtual with Skype.
“As this proves efficient, it may be utilized more frequently,” she said. Still, “there’s nothing better than in-person when convincing someone to make a move. It’s about comfort with the unknown, and a layer of distance does not help.”
Some corporate clients have shown a willingness to go virtual on even their most important transactions.
InnoCare Pharma, a biotech firm that priced a US$288 million initial public offering in Hong Kong this month, originally planned to meet investors after the Lunar New Year.
However, after the virus erupted, executives decided to conduct the roadshow online, bankers involved have said.
Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group arranged the deal.
The degree to which virtual dealmaking continues will depend on the wants of clients, bankers said.
However, for now, the industry is showing an unusual openness to do things differently.
The phenomenon of going virtual is likely to spread to rest of the world and can have a “significant” impact on reaching clients and productivity, Gokul Laroia, Morgan Stanley’s co-chief executive officer of Asia-Pacific and co-head of global equities, said in an interview.
“There will be a change, there’s no question,” he said. “I don’t know that we’re going to go all the way back to where we were. I think we will end up somewhere in the middle.”
Since COVID-19 broke out in Taiwan, there has been a fair amount of news regarding discrimination and “witch hunts” against medical personnel, people under self-quarantine and other targets, such as the students of a school where an infection was discovered. Quarantine breakers are almost certainly on the loose and it is only natural for people to be vigilant. One in Chiayi was found by accident at a traffic stop because his helmet was not fastened. However, those who follow the rules by quarantining themselves should be encouraged to keep up the good work in a difficult situation, instead of being
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) has said that there is a huge difference between Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan along the edges of its airspace and invading Taiwan’s airspace. He also said that whether it is US or Chinese aircraft flying along or encircling Taiwan’s airspace, there is no legal basis to say that such actions imply a clear provocation of Taiwan, and asked the Ministry of National Defense not to mislead the public. People who hear this might think that it is not a very Taiwanese thing to say. US military activity in the vicinity of Taiwan
As the nation welcomes home Taiwanese who had been stranded in China’s Hubei Province — arguably one of the most dangerous places on Earth since the novel coronavirus outbreak began in its capital, Wuhan, late last year — problems surrounding the “quasi-charter flights” that brought them back have been largely overlooked. The media used the term to describe the two flights dispatched by Taiwan’s state-run China Airlines because they do not count as charter flights. Taiwanese wanting to board those flights had to travel — most likely by train — more than 1,000km from Hubei to Shanghai Pudong International Airport
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist