Not to diminish the superhuman efforts of nurses, doctors and healthcare workers worldwide, but sometimes, no matter how hard one tries, and no matter how selflessly one sacrifices, one stands no chance against a more powerful enemy.
The new coronavirus, COVID-19, has proved to be such a foe. Were it not for technology, the battle against it would have been lost by now.
Math and technology, to be more precise. I say math, because understanding a concept as basic as “exponential growth” proved crucial for attacking the enemy head-on.
The successful containment of the epidemic in China, South Korea and Japan has been attributed to strong governments, and cultures that put society’s good ahead of private convenience.
I would add that these countries also stand out for their students’ high math literacy. In last year’s PISA rankings, produced by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, China ranked first in math with a score of 591 out of 600, Japan ranked sixth and South Korea was seventh.
By contrast, Italy was in 31st place, Spain placed 34th and the US ranked 37th.
PISA scores might have their shortcomings, but they do provide a rough idea of the math literacy of the average citizen in the countries that take part. That the countries with the highest rankings seem to have adopted the most effective containment strategies serves as a reminder that, ultimately, the reason we want better training in math and logic is not to land more lucrative jobs, but to make better decisions regarding our lives.
Technology has been the true champion in the fight against the spread of COVID-19. Here, I do not mean the intensive care units and respirators, without which severely ill patients would not stand a chance. I mean the new data-driven technologies that enabled responsible governments to track the infected, contact them and quarantine them early.
These technologies have been the target of much criticism in the past few years. Now, when they are helping us save lives, they deserve our praise.
South Korea’s achievement is truly impressive. As of Tuesday last week, the country has had 8,320 cases and 81 deaths, despite an early bad start. Contrast this with Italy, which at the same time reported 27,980 cases and 2,158 deaths.
Technology’s contribution to pandemic management goes beyond tracking and quarantines. As the US and countries in Europe move toward near-complete lockdown, with potentially disastrous consequences for the world economy, technology offers a glimmer of hope.
Many firms, especially in tech, have closed their offices, mandated that employees telecommute, and provided them with computing and video technology to work remotely.
Not only does this keep an important part of the economy going, but it also has had unintended positive consequences. Vehicle congestion, for example, has vanished. The hours harried commuters previously lost in traffic can now be dedicated to work and family. Corporate travel is disappearing, and video conferences are the new norm, with associated reductions in airplane pollution and huge savings in time.
Likewise, educators at nearly every level are scrambling to find online alternatives to in-classroom instruction. Whereas in earlier times, school closings would have implied loss of instruction time, technology is allowing students to continue learning. The current crisis would advance that process, as a relatively modest group of early adopters in producing online courses is joined by whole universities that have been forced to move to the Web.
Obviously, there are challenges to adapting a curriculum intended to be taught in person to the online setting.
However, with entire faculties experimenting, we are certain to see innovation and rapid improvement in the effectiveness of distance learning.
Once students finally return to the classroom, we should continue to leverage these innovations, not only in the developed world, where necessity has forced our hand, but also in developing countries hungry for cost-effective education.
In the retail sector, digital platforms can fill the gap when supermarket shelves empty or self-quarantine makes in-person shopping impossible. Film and music streaming, video chats and social media have offered avenues to reduce isolation, stay connected, and preserve mental health while locked down.
In these and other ways, the pandemic is accelerating existing technological trends and revealing important benefits, which we should embrace, both now and after the crisis abates.
However, when normalcy returns, we are also likely to confront once again some tough questions about technological innovation.
The COVID-19 crisis has revived the tension between privacy and effective targeting. In the past few years, we often encountered this debate with respect to major tech platforms using granular information about users to deliver micro-targeted news and advertising.
However, the same kinds of technology have been used to identify those infected by or most vulnerable to the coronavirus.
Of course, the tension between privacy and health outcomes is not new: The desire to protect individual histories prevents medical researchers and clinicians from mining the full set of health data to achieve better outcomes. COVID-19 reminds us that we might want to think carefully about the relative benefits of data sharing, as they might sometimes dominate the value of preserving privacy.
Absent intervention, technological trends would inevitably generate winners and losers. Brick-and-mortar stores that were already losing market share to digital platforms are likely to be decimated wherever self-quarantine and mandatory lockdowns are in effect.
Although increased telecommuting, reduced business travel and distance learning would increase productivity for some, they are significantly disrupting the livelihoods of others, and that disruption would accelerate in the next few months.
So, more than ever, it would be imperative to provide support and adjustment assistance to individuals, firms, or entire communities hit by the crisis.
However, we should resist the urge to resume our relentless, if fashionable, tech bashing. If there is a silver lining in the current crisis, it is the realization that knowledge — primarily math, science and technology in this case — is our best weapon.
Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg, a former World Bank Group chief economist and editor-in-chief of the American Economic Review, is a professor of economics at Yale University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Swirling within the cybersphere’s vast ocean of reports, statistics and graphs about the international coronavirus pandemic, there is a short sentence out there in the worldwide web, which the Chinese government doesn’t want people to notice. It is on the Johns Hopkins University website “https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html” which houses the popular “live map” of Wuhan coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) data from individual countries. That sentence reads: “The map’s names of locations correspond with the official designations used by the US State Department, including for Taiwan.” Most readers may think this merely is an unremarkable footnote, akin to other source data on the site. But
On March 6, China announced through Hong Kong’s Chinese-language Ming Pao that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) would visit Wuhan “soon.” On the same day, US-based Chinese-language IPK Media published an article by Chinese tycoon Ren Zhiqiang (任志強), with the headline: “An official call to arms against Xi: The clown who insists on wearing the emperor’s new clothes.” Will the truth about the struggles inside the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak finally be revealed? Ren’s article is reminiscent of Tang Dynasty poet Luo Binwang’s (駱賓王) “An official call to arms against Empress Wu Zetian (武則天)
Recent global media coverage of Taiwan has at times reduced the nation’s success in containing the spread of COVID-19 to some East Asian values such as cooperation with social control or Confucianism. An article in Wired magazine debunks this myth, crediting the nation’s success to democracy and transparency. It is appalling to learn that this misconception still exists. Here is one thing that world citizens should keep in mind: Taiwan is the first and only country in Asia that has legalized same-sex marriage. There is nothing Confucian about that. If anything, the Confucian legacy is a major obstacle that Taiwanese
The novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 — or the Wuhan virus, after the Chinese city from which it emerged — could not have come at a more advantageous time for China’s communist government. Not for the Chinese people, of course, thousands of whom have perished because of Beijing’s lack of transparency, disinformation and cruel refusal to cooperate with international public health organizations. No, the advantage goes exclusively to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), whose deceptive practices unleashed the deadly virus to the world. To understand how Beijing benefits from the pandemic, it is necessary