Fri, Mar 13, 2020 page9

• Climate change action taking back seat as COVID-19 spreads

  • By Marlowe Hood / AFP, PARIS
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Economic shock waves from the COVID-19 outbreak have curbed carbon pollution from China and beyond, but hopes for climate benefits from the slowdown are likely to be dashed quickly, experts say.

  As governments prepare to spend their way out of the crisis, including with large infrastructure projects, global warming concerns will be little more than an afterthought, dwarfed by a drive to prop up a stuttering world economy, experts say.

  Preparations for a make-or-break climate summit in November are already off track, with host Britain focused on its Brexit transition and the challenge to its health system of the global pandemic.

  Like an unintended lab experiment, the global health emergency demonstrates the cause-and-effect relationship that drives global warming. In the four weeks to March 1, China’s discharge of carbon dioxide fell 200 million tonnes, or 25 percent, compared with the same period last year, according to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) — equivalent to annual carbon dioxide emissions from Argentina, Egypt or Vietnam.

  As China’s economy slowed to a crawl, coal consumption at power plants there declined by 36 percent and the use of oil at refineries by nearly as much.

  Other major economies are bound to sputter, too. The outbreak has already drained stock markets of US$9 trillion in value and could end up costing the global economy up to US$2.7 trillion, according to Bloomberg Economics.

  “When you turn off the global fossil fuel economy, greenhouse gas emissions go down, air quality improves,” said Jon Erickson, a professor of sustainability science and policy at the University of Vermont.

  However, any climate silver lining will be short-lived, experts warn.

  “The emissions reductions we see now because of the epidemic are temporary, not structural,” said Joeri Rogelj from Imperial College London, a lead scientist on the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. “If anything, it makes mitigation efforts harder, because it reduces our resources to invest in the transformations needed for climate change protection.”

  There are already signs that Beijing — impatient to reboot China’s economy — will rain down cash on carbon-intensive infrastructure projects, as happened after the global recession in 2008 and again in 2015.

  “Initial announcements of stimulus have had no environmental emphasis whatsoever,” CREA lead analyst Lauri Myllyvirta said.

  Proposals to further loosen controls on new coal power plants show that concerns about debt and emissions are being brushed aside, Myllyvirta said.

  “A round of cheap credits and a blind eye to inefficient polluting industries will lead to ‘retaliatory emissions,’ setting China back on the goal of enhancing its climate targets,” Greenpeace East Asia climate policy analyst Li Shuo (李碩) said.

  A surge in state-directed capital spending a decade ago slowed China’s clean-energy transition and amplified the horrendous pollution episodes in the winter of 2012-2013.

  Globally, carbon dioxide emissions in 2010 from fossil fuel combustion grew nearly 6 percent, more than offsetting the modest decrease the year before, said Glen Peters, a scientist at the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research.

  The coronavirus fallout highlights how hard it will be to reach the Paris Agreement temperature targets of capping global warming at less than 2°C from preindustrial levels, and 1.5°C if feasible. The Earth’s surface has already warmed more than 1°C.

  To turn a corner, the world needs a combination of growing GDP and falling carbon dioxide emissions, but historically, growth and emissions have moved in lock-step.

  IMF managing director Kristalina Georgieva predicts that COVID-19 will knock at least 0.5 percentage points off projected global GDP growth this year from an initial forecast of 3.3 percent.

  The UN has said that carbon dioxide emissions must drop 8 percent annually over the next decade to meet the 1.5°C Paris goal, and by about 3 percent per year to hold the line at 2°C.

  Experts say only a sustained global economic meltdown — or an internationally coordinated, war-footing transition to a carbon-neutral economy — could come close to slashing carbon pollution that quickly. One is as unpalatable as the other is unlikely.

  So far only the electricity sector has seen a — very modest — decoupling of emissions and economic growth.

  “I’m sure the global economy will get back on the fossil-fuel train as soon as it possibly can,” Erickson said.

  As for the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland, in November, the kind of non-stop shuttle diplomacy carried out by France for nearly two years ahead of the successful 2015 Paris talks is not happening, analysts say.

  China — the world’s largest carbon polluter with 29 percent of global emissions — also has a crucial role to play, but is likely to be distracted.

  “There is a risk that the main objective for Beijing will be the resolution of its health crisis,” said Sebastien Treyer, director of the Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations in Paris.

  Last week preliminary UN climate meetings in Bonn, Germany, and Kampala were canceled or postponed.

  Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    German warships to pass through Strait

  • 2

    Sino-Russian air patrol designed to counter US

  • 3

    Court orders Ko Wen-je’s detention

  • 4

    US House passes Taiwan conflict act

  • 5

    Travel warning issued over CCP Xinjiang efforts