The COVID-19 outbreak in China has renewed the debate over whether Chinese should be allowed to use the National Health Insurance (NHI) system.
Much of the controversy centers on a Taiwanese teenager who has hemophilia and lives in Wuhan, China, the epicenter of the outbreak, with his mother, a Chinese who obtained Republic of China (ROC) citizenship through a previous marriage.
Just as the teenager ran out of medication for the disease, the Taiwanese government sent a flight to Chengdu, China, to bring the mother and son to Taiwan, where he has since been on steady medication.
The source of controversy was a decision made by the administration of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in 2015 that relaxed the rules on Chinese citizens’ eligibility for the NHI system by broadening the scope of resident certificates to include entry permits awarded to Chinese who are married to Taiwanese or are in the nation “visiting a relative.” The move was a clear violation of due legislative procedure and widely panned as overstepping the National Health Insurance Act (全民健康保險法). It also means that Chinese enjoy the same healthcare benefits as Taiwanese as long as they are given a residency certificate for visiting their Taiwanese step-parent.
According to statistics compiled by the National Health Insurance Administration, about 63,000 Chinese benefited from the rule change in 2015, which in turn increased NHI expenditure by NT$31.5 million (US$1.05 million at the current exchange rate).
In the wake of the controversy, lawmakers in the pan-green camp have issued calls for the rule to be abolished or amended, with Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) and Taiwan Statebuilding Party Legislator Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟) vowing to close the loophole in the NHI system created by Ma’s administration.
Meanwhile, DPP Legislator Lin Chun-hsien (林俊憲) recommended amending the act to raise the NHI premiums for those who do not live in the nation for at least 183 days annually.
He proposed that the NHI rates for these people be set in proportion to their annual income overseas, which could see the monthly premiums of high-income earners raised from NT$749 to NT$12,000 — the highest possible rate under the insurance system in the absence of premium allocations from a local employer or the government.
The proposals to rectify the problem deserve praise, but with the DPP having been the ruling party for almost four years, such calls are long overdue.
Any government would adopt a hardline stance if a lobbyist called for a person of another nationality to enjoy the same social welfare as its citizens, so it makes no sense for Chinese to use the NHI just because they are visiting a relative and need an extended stay in the nation.
It defies the logic of any sensible government, and if any Chinese had thought about exploiting this rule, they would have succeeded if Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) last month had not overturned a Mainland Affairs Council policy that would allow the Chinese children of Taiwanese and Chinese couples to return from China.
The Mainland Affairs Council in the frequently asked questions section of its Web site states that any Chinese spouse who has not renounced their People’s Republic of China citizenship will have their ROC citizenship rescinded, so the debate of whether Chinese should be allowed to use the NHI is a non-starter, and should be responded to with a resounding “no.”
With Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) and DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) having clarified their stance for amending the rule, it is down to President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to give the legislative effort the go-ahead.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
RSS