The debate over whether the Legislative Yuan should continue to hold the national policy forum has dragged on for years. Early in this legislative session, the New Power Party caucus proposed abolishing it to improve parliamentary efficiency.
The Democratic Progressive Party caucus said that it would not rule out supporting the proposal, while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus wanted to focus on the legislative committees, and the Taiwan People’s Party caucus said that it had yet to discuss the issue.
The national policy forum was established 16 years ago as a platform for minority parties to promptly respond to public opinion. Hasty abolishment without preparing an alternative might cause smaller parties to be ignored, which is not beneficial to improving parliamentary efficiency.
Whether it is a matter of interpellation, bill deliberation, hearings or investigations, all issues should be debated by legislators, as “debate” should be at the core of the legislature’s business. Legislators should establish two-way communication by convincing each other through logical arguments, not by hurling insults or launching personal attacks.
To establish an equal dialogue based on free and rational debate, improve the scientific and democratic nature of decisionmaking and minimize the negative effects of checks and balances on power, both the British Parliament and the US Congress have set debating rules.
For instance, a member should not deviate from the topic, nor use profane or vulgar language to address other members, and they should refer to them by constituency rather than personal name. These regulations program legislators to conduct rational discussion.
The Legislative Yuan has followed outdated rules since its establishment. Picking up bad habits from predecessors, most newly elected lawmakers often use loud and strong language, and few rely on rational reasoning.
Following the nation’s first direct legislative election in 1992, lawmakers often scrambled to express their opinions on current affairs by asking for the floor to speak for three minutes using their right to raise a question of privilege, raise a point of order or make a parliamentary inquiry.
Such conduct not only posed a great challenge to the legislative speaker, it also interrupted the predetermined session agenda.
In September 1994, a consensus was reached through cross-caucus negotiations to implement the national policy forum to prevent the legislative agenda from being interrupted by lawmakers asking for the floor.
Lawmakers who want to express their opinion can register and draw lots to speak for three minutes during the hour-long forum before the legislative session starts.
However, in practice these addresses are influenced by TV broadcasts. When the cameras are directed toward the legislative floor, the spotlight is on the lawmaker’s performance.
Protected by legislative immunity, lawmakers have gradually turned the forum into a stage for political posturing and all kinds of peculiar performances, such as wearing bizarre costumes, bringing props and banners, playing music, making sarcastic remarks or hurling insults, calling the forum’s appropriateness into question.
Debating the problems currently facing the nation and the measures to be adopted by the government is more beneficial to formulating feasible policies and in line with international trends than a legislator delivering a soliloquy in the forum.
Lawmakers across party lines should seize this opportunity to establish debating rules to replace the forum.
Lo Chuan-hsien is a former director-general of the Legislative Yuan’s Organic Laws and Statutes Bureau.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
China has started to call Tibet “Xizang” instead of Tibet for several reasons. First, China wants to assert its sovereignty and legitimacy over Tibet, which it claims as an integral part of its territory and history. China argues that the term Xizang, which means “western Tsang” in Chinese, reflects the historical and administrative reality of the region, which was divided into U-Tsang, Amdo and Kham by the Tibetans themselves. China also contends that the term Tibet, which derives from the Mongolian word Tubet, is a foreign imposition that does not represent the diversity and complexity of the region. Second, China wants to
Taiwan has a very important decision to make in the upcoming presidential election. One party stands for protecting the integrity of Taiwanese self-rule, the other two main parties who stand a chance at winning both cater to China and, if elected, would risk locking Taiwan into a position of being annexed by China against the will of a vast majority of the population. Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, and the KMT all need a history lesson. Taiwan was never ceded to the Republic of China (ROC). The
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) had engaged in weeks of political horse-trading between high-ranking officials, hoping to form a joint ticket to win January’s presidential election, but it all ended in a dramatic public falling out on live television on Thursday. The farcical performance involving mudslinging and quarrels among three men — the TPP’s candidate and Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), the KMT’s candidate, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), an independent — and their aides in the evening before the official candidate registration deadline
Due in large part to the US-China trade war, Taiwanese supply chains continue to relocate from China and some manufacturers have increased the rate at which they have invested in Mexico to align their operations with the needs of customers and to comply with US policy. However, setting up manufacturing plants in Mexico is not without its complications, including the language barrier, different cultures, local regulations and finding qualified staff. Accumulating talent with proficiency in Spanish is the first step to developing the market in Mexico, and indeed Latin America as a whole. WHY MEXICO Mexico is a good location for three
RSS