Some Chinese companies that are closed due to the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak are expected to resume operations as early as this week.
However, the move has caused concern over likely person-to-person transmissions, fanning fears that the virus would spread even further, as it has not been effectively contained.
Local governments and businesses in China should decide carefully when to resume operations, and evaluate whether they have the facilities to test suspected cases and sufficient protective gear for employees.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, the biggest assembler of Apple Inc’s iPhones, on Friday told its employees in Shenzhen, China, not to return to work today as planned and await further instructions, Bloomberg reported, citing a text message it saw.
Amid a shortage of medical equipment in China, the company on Thursday began trial production of protective masks and medical clothing to be used at its Shenzhen plant, Reuters reported.
However, not all companies have the resources to take such measures.
The reopening of Chinese businesses — which are crucial to the global supply chain and markets — might lead to logistics disruptions and higher operational costs, as suppliers in a dozen cities are under lockdown while mandatory quarantine rules are implemented in more cities.
A shortage of personnel and raw materials is likely to be the biggest problem affecting the supply chain after the resumption of work.
Even though some Taiwanese businesses had relocated part of their operations to Vietnam or elsewhere before the outbreak, they would still face supply chain disruptions, as many of their components, materials and even personnel come from China.
China is also facing growing suspicion over its pledge to buy more US goods under the “phase one” trade deal it signed with Washington early last month, as well as whether Chinese companies would declare force majeure to get out of long-term contracts with their overseas partners.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) assured US President Donald Trump during a telephone call on Thursday that China would meet its pledge to buy US$200 billion of US goods over the next two years, although there might be some initial delays, US National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow told the Wall Street Journal on Friday.
However, it is not known whether Beijing would request exceptions from the trade agreement, depending on how its efforts to contain the virus pan out.
French oil company Total on Thursday became the first global energy supplier to reject a force majeure notice from a liquefied natural gas buyer in China, which wanted to back out of a contract amid the outbreak, Reuters reported.
More Chinese companies making similar declarations to avoid their contractual obligations could have an adverse affect on global energy and commodity prices.
The outbreak is causing problems that are beyond companies’ control. Economists have warned that it presents a risk to business operations, manufacturing supply chains and the outlook of global markets.
However, it also tests Beijing’s crisis management capabilities and draws global attention to its public governance, and if China acts irresponsibly or inappropriately, its behavior might have an even greater negative effect on the international marketplace and the global outlook than the disease itself.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It